Rant about NATs' Sponsors

[xxxjay]

Originally Posted by Wazza

Sponsors should think very carefully before going to NATS... CCbill pays on time every week...

How many ppl using NATS actually use a cascade? Looking around - I've seen plenty that don't...

I understand that it's whizz bang and looks good... I just wish NATS would become a payment aggregator too...

1. True. CCBill declines up to 40% of transactions, as well.

2. I wouldn't promote a program that did this either -- we've got Paycom, CCBill, WTS, and Password by phone -- one way or another -- if you want to pay -- we will get the money.

3. I would love that too, but that is way beyond their realm of duties as a software maker.

[Wazza]

Originally Posted by xxxjay

1. True. CCBill declines up to 40% of transactions, as well.

Which they do with good reason... thousands of transactions later and I could count on a little over one hand my refunds and CBs with them...

Paycom scrubs just as hard if not harder... They piss me off full stop to be truthful... no account merging means I've got piddling little amounts of money sitting in their bank a/c that I'll never see...

And only one of them came very close to going tits up... something we as a group seem to have miraculously forgotten...

Originally Posted by xxxjay

3. I would love that too, but that is way beyond their realm of duties as a software maker.

I fully appreciate that this is a pipe dream and I do agree - it's above and beyond the call of duty... it would make me (and I believe many others) happier to take up proggies that use NATS... it's something for them to at least consider imo...