Rant about NATs' Sponsors

[SmithsMedia]

Originally Posted by Chop Smith

Like a dog chases a bitch in heat, I chase host free sites. So I find a sponsor that say that they have hfs', so I run over and sign up. I then go look at what they have and to grab the link codes to discover that I can not use them because they have NATs encoded id's.

1. Why would a NATS' user not include NATS' encodes/unencoded option?
2. Why would a sponsor start a thread bitching about his dislike of his codes being encoded and months after NATS gives the option for unencoded he does have the option on his site.

Long time no speak chop merry xmas mate -

Thats nothing I pushed a site which was on CCBill then moved via some other system to Nats. - sorry my Nats rant

Since the move they have added sms as a payment option because they said Nats supported it, now I make like 3 US cents per sale instead of $14.99!

For one month now I have asked when it will be fixed and nothing has been done, to top all this off they also LOST my sales - on the friday night they were there, me and the sponsor saw them the next morning they were gone, about 400 USD.

To this day no one has explained what happened, I got paid the missing money not before the sponor offered to pay half as a good gesture.

I have two other Nats one I had started to build up though after getting the above issues I am not doing anything till I get paid and told what happened to the figures.