|
|
|
|
|
|
|
View Poll Results: What internet content label do you think should be the standard and promoted as such? | |||
ICRA label (or another existing system) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 10.67% |
A simple <content="adult"> meta tag |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
45 | 60.00% |
A more complex tag with varying content levels but still one that is just inserted in the html (much like current TV or MPA ratings) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
11 | 14.67% |
A meta label combined with V-chip type system |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 6.67% |
No label |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 8.00% |
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#13 |
Jim? I heard he's a dirty pornographer.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,706
|
If AVS will actually keep minors out is not really the issue at hand.
The FSC has members that are pushing for an AVS. They made comments to the Senate about AVS. A very well respected free speech law firm is patenting an AVS technology. http://birthdateverifier.com/ http://www.firstamendment.com/protecting_banner.php3 Currently only 2 technologies exist to keep minors away from porn. Labeling and AVS. We know that AVS will never work but we know that there's a huge amount of money in technology patents. DJilla posted some concern about labeling. I was expressing that I'm OK with labeling and if we don't purpose something soon we may end up with an AVS because there will be big bucks in it. We can argue about the issues with AVS all day long. While we're doing that we're not pushing a labeling system that will work and others are pushing forward with their AVS proposals. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|