Define a quality post

[Chimera]

Originally Posted by walrus

I'd like to hear what others think would make up a quality post. We all feel that sponsors feeds suck for the most part but I would counter that most bloggers suck.

As a group, if we can't define what it is we're looking for then sponsors that do want to provide quality feeds are left with a moving target to try and shoot at because I can tell you, what I am really looking for in a blog or a feed is going to be different than the next guy.

I can tell already the opinions here will vary widely. If you are a splogger (nothing at all wrong with that) then I bet Tpat's would fit perfectly.
If on the other hand you blog then your needs might vary wildly. I will tell you what I do find unusable, however.
Solo girl personality sites with long descriptions of sexual escapades, or fashion descriptions, with no personality in it. I don't care that the girl just took on a 20 man train, because I don't have anything personal about her. Just the sex, and there are 1000 of them out there just like her. How can I write a post on her if I have nothing to work with, besides the 250 word description of how she took on a 20 guy train, or double anal, or whatever, and a huge pic that I must resize?
I mean..."Ooo! I had to put cute little bootsy the cat out on the patio because she really hates it when I have these orgies. Last orgy she ate my gerbils out of spite". Would be something to work with!
So if you are selling a personality feed, a personality would be nice. I always lean toward anything that has a personality, even an abrasive one.
I would like to see feeds that had material I could work with to give the site or the girl a distinctive feel. Right now I am scouring tours for any hint of distinctiveness to blog on, and to use as sidebar features.
In conclusion I would like to emphasize, I am prepared to do my own writing. I just need the raw material.
Sorry Walrus, that I could not give you exact requirements, but my voice is only one among many.