Are we asking for trouble?

RawAlex · 2003-09-04, 12:17 PM

Ramster: I get the same thing... lost posts, not found, etc... wierd stuff!

Boy/Girl: The Boy and Mature Women ones are a godo example of using "positioning" to make the boys look younger, and the girls to look older. I suspect all the boys are over 18, but they seem to have gone far out of their way to select the skinniest, most under-developed little boys they could find.

It may not be CP directly, but it is pandering, and I won't be a part of pandering.

Beyond that, I notice that most of those "sites" depend on either the boy or the MINF (mother's I'd never fuck) being or playing "drunk". That adds an adiditonal level of "non consentual" to the situation, which just ain't good.

I don't allow many uses of "boy" any more in sites I list, unless I feel the sites are not trying to play the "younger than young" card.

Alex

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

2003-09-04, 12:17 PM	#7
RawAlex Took the hint. Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,597	Ramster: I get the same thing... lost posts, not found, etc... wierd stuff! Boy/Girl: The Boy and Mature Women ones are a godo example of using "positioning" to make the boys look younger, and the girls to look older. I suspect all the boys are over 18, but they seem to have gone far out of their way to select the skinniest, most under-developed little boys they could find. It may not be CP directly, but it is pandering, and I won't be a part of pandering. Beyond that, I notice that most of those "sites" depend on either the boy or the MINF (mother's I'd never fuck) being or playing "drunk". That adds an adiditonal level of "non consentual" to the situation, which just ain't good. I don't allow many uses of "boy" any more in sites I list, unless I feel the sites are not trying to play the "younger than young" card. Alex