Would these sites be accepted?

[gaydemon]

Thanks for the tips, I've got someone reviewing the link texts.

The thing is, I'm getting very confused. I hear one thing (and read on the rules) and see another.

I for exampled looked through several sites listed on Link-o-rama, and they are messy, have more then 5 reciprocal links on the warning page (against the rules), the content is rubbish (same over used content over and over again). They have misleading links, one advertises Pridemovies with banners, but have text link below it is for another site (randyblue), the images are definitly nowhere near 1200px in total..

So I'm not sure what to believe, or to do. Some rules also seems to be contradicting themselves..

Should I just try and submit sites or?

Originally Posted by Bill

Well, I think you'll get some reviewers getting cranky because the templates all look very much alike. Write a selection of new stylesheets and rotate them and you will avoid this. Mostly - straght linklist builders have learned that it's best to create more 'different looking' sites, to keep the reviewers happy.

And some reviewers will say these are blind links - http://www.pornisation.com/sites/twi..._tbd/main.html

If you had the link text say "Click Here to watch the Boy Fun Collection Now!" - that wouldn't be blind.