Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > General Business Knowledge
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2005-12-08, 10:49 PM   #1
Surfn
If you don’t take a chance the Angels won’t dance
 
Surfn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Earth on occasion
Posts: 8,812
Send a message via ICQ to Surfn
Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
I think that the world got the internet backwards. The internet is like normal every day life.

In the real world, parents are responsible (in theory) not to have their children out late, going to bars, strip clubs, and picking up hookers. The internet is no different. Attempting to apply a "broadcast regulation" to the internet is not going to work.

For my money, the assumption should be made that the internet as a whole is 18+ environment. ADULTS ONLY. Sites that want to be child safe can register, get checked, and become child safe.

Think about it. Every blog, every news site, every... well, almost whatever except disney MIGHT have material not suitable for minors of one sort or another. Attempting to register and block off 95% of the sites is a pointless exercise when the burden could be put on the few child safe sites to work out a way to make themselves flagged as "acceptable".

The internet would be a much better place if the collective governments would just leave us the fuck alone.

Alex
Amen!!!
__________________

Surfn's Links Are you a partner?

Surfn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-12-09, 01:05 PM   #2
Hammer
Are you sure you're an accredited and honored pornographer?
 
Hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 62
Even Disney has things that are unsuitable for some kids. Captain Hook scared the shit out of me when I was little and the Wicked Witch in Snow White gave me nightmares.
__________________
Hammer
Porn Site Pros - Complete free and paysite packages
$500 off our gay pay sites for the holidays
Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-12-13, 03:25 PM   #3
MeatPounder
Women might be able to fake orgasms But men can fake whole relationships
 
MeatPounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 2,408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammer
Even Disney has things that are unsuitable for some kids. Captain Hook scared the shit out of me when I was little and the Wicked Witch in Snow White gave me nightmares.

LOL
I'll never forget taking my 3 yr old to disney world back in 92 on a trip down here to Fl.
Some of the attractions were off limit cause of her age and height of course, but as Snow White and the 7 Dwarfs was one of her favorite Disney movies she just had to see that attraction. Seemed like an enjoyable ride for a lil one.

Well turns out the Seven Dwarfs ride was through their mine, dark and gloomy with the Wicked Witch cackling in the shadows then popping up everywheres causing cave ins on us and flames flaring up around us...timbers creaking, walls shifting...hell that ride even scared me a lil

Well Little Jackie spent 90% of the ride on the cowering floor of the car between my feet. Hell when we got back up to Ma she made me throw out the Snow White video in the trash and as far as I know she has never watched anything to do with Snow White or the 7 Dwarves again...lol

We also still have a pic of our lil munchkin next to a Captain Hook 4 times her height with a terrified look of apprehension on her face.

Last edited by MeatPounder; 2005-12-13 at 03:29 PM..
MeatPounder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-12-17, 09:30 AM   #4
susanna
Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip!
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Send a message via ICQ to susanna
Quote:
Originally Posted by MeatPounder
LOL
I'll never forget taking my 3 yr old to disney world back in 92 on a trip down here to Fl.
Some of the attractions were off limit cause of her age and height of course, but as Snow White and the 7 Dwarfs was one of her favorite Disney movies she just had to see that attraction. Seemed like an enjoyable ride for a lil one.

Well turns out the Seven Dwarfs ride was through their mine, dark and gloomy with the Wicked Witch cackling in the shadows then popping up everywheres causing cave ins on us and flames flaring up around us...timbers creaking, walls shifting...hell that ride even scared me a lil

Well Little Jackie spent 90% of the ride on the cowering floor of the car between my feet. Hell when we got back up to Ma she made me throw out the Snow White video in the trash and as far as I know she has never watched anything to do with Snow White or the 7 Dwarves again...lol

We also still have a pic of our lil munchkin next to a Captain Hook 4 times her height with a terrified look of apprehension on her face.

Have you watched Shrek 2 ?? I was astonished at the inuendo and blatant mention of sexual topics. My daughter was 10 at the time and I had to constantly talk to her about the things mentioned because she WAS old enough to understand what they were talking about. Most everyone says "yeah but kids dont understand what that means" I think that isnt true. They understand the intent of teasing someone and that it was about something "naughty" and if they dont understand now they are getting close by movies pretending to be for kids clueing them in.
__________________
Susanna
susanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-12-13, 08:34 AM   #5
RawAlex
Took the hint.
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,597
Send a message via AIM to RawAlex
Djilla, the problem stems from "label adult" as opposed to "label acceptable to children". The basic assumption is (incorrectly) that the WWW as a whole is safe for children, and only a few sites are "adult" in nature. In reality, most of the web in one form or another is not safe to be viewed by an 8 year old child.

Remember, adult doesn't mean porn, think of things like beer, wine, news, movies, chat rooms, discussions, blogs, video games... I could go on and on. Very very little of the internet is 100% safe for children. It should be for those people who want to make child safe content to register it as such and for browser manufactures to restrict access to those sites that permit children.

Forcing only adult sex sites to label and not requiring 100% of sites to label makes it a pointless exercise.

Alex
RawAlex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2005-12-17, 09:27 AM   #6
susanna
Shut up brain, or I'll stab you with a Q-tip!
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 114
Send a message via ICQ to susanna
Quote:
Originally Posted by RawAlex
Djilla, the problem stems from "label adult" as opposed to "label acceptable to children". The basic assumption is (incorrectly) that the WWW as a whole is safe for children, and only a few sites are "adult" in nature. In reality, most of the web in one form or another is not safe to be viewed by an 8 year old child.

Remember, adult doesn't mean porn, think of things like beer, wine, news, movies, chat rooms, discussions, blogs, video games... I could go on and on. Very very little of the internet is 100% safe for children. It should be for those people who want to make child safe content to register it as such and for browser manufactures to restrict access to those sites that permit children.

Forcing only adult sex sites to label and not requiring 100% of sites to label makes it a pointless exercise.

Alex

I am with you Alex. If the parents want a safe place to let their kids loose on the net then they should make it. Make themselves a browser for kids. Make themselves a gateway and check and monitor all sites in there. There would be absolutely NO reason for anyone to put porn in their gateway unless they are completely stupid or evil as the assumption is that children do not have credit cards.

Preditors would have a reason to find their way in though and I am sure anyone that has proposed such a place knows that it is impossible to keep preditors out. The liability is what keeps anyone from making such a place. How cool would it be if it could be done?

Maybe another idea is to make a browser that facilitates a parents ability to make a kind of accepted sites list for their kids. So kid site webmasters can list themselves with this system. The parents can review the site and approve the site for their kids viewing. Maintenance by the parents (adding new sites all the time) would ensure a great experience for their kids. If a parent wants the net experience to be wide and vast they will put lots of time into their adding of sites. I find it impossible to find educational sites when my young teen kids come asking me to help them find something for their special projects at school. If I could narrow my search to trusted sites I have already included based on their merrit, it would be so much easier.

Infact you could sell "packs" of preapproved sites "educational" "for ages 8 and under" what ever. Little spin off cottage industry ha ha ha

Someone just has to do it. Build it and they will come.
__________________
Susanna
susanna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 AM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc