Hardlinking to free sites

Morph · 2005-08-13, 06:32 AM

So here's the question.
Most of you LL owners do link to free sites directly. Basicly, this should mean that you are giving away your PR to those sites which has no sence.
The reason for maintaining a LL is to get as much SE traffic as possible and then send that traffic to sites you list. So direct links should be kinda wrong thing to do.
No direct links to free sites (i.e. through script or somethg) should mean more IN links then OUT ones and as a result better PR and more traffic to free sites.
So let's discuss this, what do ya think? |cool|

2005-08-13, 06:32 AM	#1
Morph Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22	Hardlinking to free sites So here's the question. Most of you LL owners do link to free sites directly. Basicly, this should mean that you are giving away your PR to those sites which has no sence. The reason for maintaining a LL is to get as much SE traffic as possible and then send that traffic to sites you list. So direct links should be kinda wrong thing to do. No direct links to free sites (i.e. through script or somethg) should mean more IN links then OUT ones and as a result better PR and more traffic to free sites. So let's discuss this, what do ya think? \|cool\|