Flash and free sites.

dandith · 2004-12-31, 12:36 AM

What is the general rule on flash on free site's. It' s plugin but are plugin's allowed etc. I was thinking of putting a site with flash banners headers but wanted to check before I worked it.
Thanks

grzepa · 2004-12-31, 04:29 AM

Im not a LL owner (yet), but I think flash would be a no no on free-sites.

Porneek · 2004-12-31, 06:42 AM

yup i agree... dont put flash on freesites... there are still lot of dialup users and as u know it takes time for the flash to load, and with all the pics on the freesites, it will just drive surfers away.. just an opinion!

Linkster · 2004-12-31, 08:02 AM

Some people use the flash banners - its not really that big a deal but for sales (because of the dialup users) I would stick to standard graphics - of course you can resize the banners to get around the standard ad-blockers these days

Halfdeck · 2004-12-31, 04:27 PM

Flash is iffy like Linkster said because 1) for people on dialup it can take too long to load 2) some people feel uncomfortable about downloading/installing plugins 3) it raises your bandwidth cost a tad.

BUT...Flash *might* improve your sales with surfers on DSL/cable who's used to surfing Flash-enhanced sites. Also keep in mind although alot of people are still on dialup, now there are more people on broadband.

It would be cool if surfers could choose between a flash version and low-bandwidth version of the free site -- for builders that want to go that extra 10 miles to spice up their sites. On the warning page, you'd have: ENTER XXXX (Flash Version) and ENTER HERE (Regular Version).

RivalDiamondz · 2005-01-11, 11:05 AM

As a huge Flash fan, I naturally feel I should say put it up, but that might not be the case. These guys are right with the load time and such, though the plugin for Flash isn't really a huge deal unless you are programming in Flash MX 2004, the actionscript is not backwards compatable. Otherwise, almost every browser comes with the Flash Player 6 or below.

Halfdeck seems to have the right idea with the choice, but if I were to offer that I would make the entire 'Flash Side' to be Flash. It would seem to be a waste to make an entire new page to just add a few Flash banners and such.....if you're going to do it, might as well do it big no? Maybe thats just me |rasta|

May the porn gods smile upon ya!

2004-12-31, 12:36 AM	#1
dandith Internet! Is that thing still around? Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Seattle Posts: 7	Flash and free sites. What is the general rule on flash on free site's. It' s plugin but are plugin's allowed etc. I was thinking of putting a site with flash banners headers but wanted to check before I worked it. Thanks

2004-12-31, 04:29 AM	#2
grzepa You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 980	Im not a LL owner (yet), but I think flash would be a no no on free-sites. __________________ RATIOS SUCK ? - TRY REALITYCASH !

2004-12-31, 06:42 AM	#3
Porneek If something goes wrong at the plant, blame the guy who can't speak English Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: California, USA Posts: 39	yup i agree... dont put flash on freesites... there are still lot of dialup users and as u know it takes time for the flash to load, and with all the pics on the freesites, it will just drive surfers away.. just an opinion! __________________ Submit your freesites and galleries to Porneek XXX Links

2004-12-31, 08:02 AM	#4
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Some people use the flash banners - its not really that big a deal but for sales (because of the dialup users) I would stick to standard graphics - of course you can resize the banners to get around the standard ad-blockers these days __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2005-01-11, 11:05 AM	#6
RivalDiamondz Aw, Dad, you've done a lot of great things, but you're a very old man, and old people are useless Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Denver, CO Posts: 26	As a huge Flash fan, I naturally feel I should say put it up, but that might not be the case. These guys are right with the load time and such, though the plugin for Flash isn't really a huge deal unless you are programming in Flash MX 2004, the actionscript is not backwards compatable. Otherwise, almost every browser comes with the Flash Player 6 or below. Halfdeck seems to have the right idea with the choice, but if I were to offer that I would make the entire 'Flash Side' to be Flash. It would seem to be a waste to make an entire new page to just add a few Flash banners and such.....if you're going to do it, might as well do it big no? Maybe thats just me \|rasta\| May the porn gods smile upon ya! __________________ The world is a Savage Garden ICQ : 213469331 AIM : RivalWebmassa

2004-12-31, 04:27 PM	#5
Halfdeck You can now put whatever you want in this space :) Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: New Haven, CT Posts: 985	Flash is iffy like Linkster said because 1) for people on dialup it can take too long to load 2) some people feel uncomfortable about downloading/installing plugins 3) it raises your bandwidth cost a tad. BUT...Flash might improve your sales with surfers on DSL/cable who's used to surfing Flash-enhanced sites. Also keep in mind although alot of people are still on dialup, now there are more people on broadband. It would be cool if surfers could choose between a flash version and low-bandwidth version of the free site -- for builders that want to go that extra 10 miles to spice up their sites. On the warning page, you'd have: ENTER XXXX (Flash Version) and ENTER HERE (Regular Version).