The Official "Why Didn't My Site Get Accepted To Hoes.com" Thread

[neveremail]

Hi,

I was just trying to submit and got the following error:
"Oops, we had the following problem:
Sorry, your domain has been banned from submitting (http://www.paradisebikinis.com/sexy-panties3/index.htm) "

Have I really been banned - you had been listing my sites previously - could you let me know if I did something wrong.

Thanks

[mezzanine]

Originally Posted by neveremail

Hi,

I was just trying to submit and got the following error:
"Oops, we had the following problem:
Sorry, your domain has been banned from submitting (http://www.paradisebikinis.com/sexy-panties3/index.htm) "

Have I really been banned - you had been listing my sites previously - could you let me know if I did something wrong.

Thanks

Hi neveremail...I blacklisted the domain because of the URL:
http://www.paradisebikinis.com/lingerie-sex3/index.htm
It redirects me to a page that launches several pop-ups.

Chuck

[neveremail]

Originally Posted by mezzanine

Hi neveremail...I blacklisted the domain because of the URL:
http://www.paradisebikinis.com/lingerie-sex3/index.htm
It redirects me to a page that launches several pop-ups.

Chuck

Sorry dude - I dont know why I sent you that url in the first place as it does not exist - it is just my 404 redirect that is sending you to the pop-up pages.

the url should be:
http://www.paradisebikinis.com/lingerie-sex7/index.htm

I think I fucked up somehwere in advanced submitter one day and it counted my urls up from 3 instead of 7 and I did not notice.

Sorry for the inconveinience and hopefully you can un-blacklist me

[mezzanine]

Originally Posted by neveremail

Sorry dude - I dont know why I sent you that url in the first place as it does not exist - it is just my 404 redirect that is sending you to the pop-up pages.

the url should be:
http://www.paradisebikinis.com/lingerie-sex7/index.htm

I think I fucked up somehwere in advanced submitter one day and it counted my urls up from 3 instead of 7 and I did not notice.

Sorry for the inconveinience and hopefully you can un-blacklist me

Thanks for the explanation. I'll forward this info to, marc.

[neveremail]

Originally Posted by mezzanine

Thanks for the explanation. I'll forward this info to, marc.

Thanks dude.

[cybersexhound]

Does Hoes give reject letters?

[mezzanine]

Originally Posted by cybersexhound

Does Hoes give reject letters?

Hi cybersexhound...Yes, we do.

Chuck

[atlant]

Hi Hoes!

This site isn't listed:

http://www.cfnmparty.net/humiliation...et/1/index.htm

[atlant]

Another one:

http://www.dogginginuk.co.uk/uk-dogg...li/1/index.htm

[atlant]

One more:

http://www.freesex-club.com/celebrit...lera/index.htm

[mezzanine]

Hi atlant...The first site you posted is still in our queue. I will most likely get to it tonight. The second one contains content featuring a model that we feel is overused. The third one states that both singers are nude in the galleries when they're not. I also consider the "Paris Hilton sex tape preview" and "Cameron Diaz sex tape preview" links to be blind.

Chuck

[atlant]

Originally Posted by mezzanine

Hi atlant...The first site you posted is still in our queue. I will most likely get to it tonight. The second one contains content featuring a model that we feel is overused. The third one states that both singers are nude in the galleries when they're not. I also consider the "Paris Hilton sex tape preview" and "Cameron Diaz sex tape preview" links to be blind.

Chuck

Thanx for fast reply.
About blind links - I thought those aren't blind, 'cause they lead to preview tours which contain big picture taken from sex tape.
I will change that in future.

[XPorn]

Chuck is a pimp.

[Magnoody]

Hey mb
Firstly Hoes has always been in my top ref for months.

Hi,
http://blacksexfiles.com/black-slut/
We deleted your submission because we prefer there be no more than 16 pic/20 text recips on the warning page.
Please resubmit if you can make this change!
mb

I don't duplicate my site and this is why I use 25 recips. Unduplicated sites always get much much higher serps which is good for both of us. On the other side if I only used 20 recips I won't get any traffic and I'll have to wait for months to get some SE traffic.

I could easily duplicate the site and use less recips/page but that is not good for the long run.
Google hates nothing more than those duplicated sites on the same domain on the same host.

Almost every LL accepted the site.
25 from 20 is not a big deal . Besides your recip is on the best position

[mb]

Originally Posted by Magnoody

Hey mb
Firstly Hoes has always been in my top ref for months.



I don't duplicate my site and this is why I use 25 recips. Unduplicated sites always get much much higher serps which is good for both of us. On the other side if I only used 20 recips I won't get any traffic and I'll have to wait for months to get some SE traffic.

I could easily duplicate the site and use less recips/page but that is not good for the long run.
Google hates nothing more than those duplicated sites on the same domain on the same host.

Almost every LL accepted the site.
25 from 20 is not a big deal . Besides your recip is on the best position

Hi,

We've noticed recip tables getting bigger and bigger. In my opinion, it makes the page look very spammy and google certainly doesn't like recip spam. I think it would be better for you to make one additional mirror of your page and put the very small linklists on that mirror.

Even though your site is clean, we have to enforce our rules to maintain a clean, organized directory.

Additionaly, your use of "CLICK HERE" all over the place before you get to the actual ENTER link would get the site deleted. We are really cracking down on that right now.

marc

[Magnoody]

Thx Marc for the reply

Originally Posted by mb

Hi,

We've noticed recip tables getting bigger and bigger. In my opinion, it makes the page look very spammy

But my tables are not that big.
The page could look spammy even with 15 recips. There are a lot of LL with big recips and image recips that would make a page look very unfriendly and spammy. And there's a lot of sites listed with much bigger recip tables.

Originally Posted by mb

and google certainly doesn't like recip spam.

But this is not spam. A lot of LL have more than 25 link exchange and they are not spamming SE. As long as the text is unique and the page is getting links from big sites, SE won't see that as spamming. Instead SE will see those duplicate site as spamming even if they have only 5-6 recips.
Besides, I only use two links for every LL while some LL have 4-5 links in their recipe code.

Originally Posted by mb

I think it would be better for you to make one additional mirror of your page and put the very small linklists on that mirror.

But there's no small LL on the recip table Those are the biggest 25 LL according to Alexa rankings and Google PR

Originally Posted by mb

Even though your site is clean, we have to enforce our rules to maintain a clean, organized directory.

I do understand this You have such a great site and you have to keep it clean

Originally Posted by mb

Additionaly, your use of "CLICK HERE" all over the place before you get to the actual ENTER link would get the site deleted. We are really cracking down on that right now.

marc

I don't use "CLICK HERE" as a blind link. I alway use "Click Here for....." which is totally different. I always describe for the surfer what he's going to find. Surfers always tend to finish reading the description and then return back and click the link if they are interested. And from my stats I can see that those who were really interested clicked the links

And almost every banner has click here and they are accepted. Would you reject sites with banners that have click here or should I just open ImageReady and save click here in a gif file?
IMO there's always rules and there's a lot of ways to go around them and this is why there are human reviewers

Have a nice day Marc
Magnoody
ICQ : 331-273-525

[mb]

Originally Posted by Magnoody

Thx Marc for the reply


But my tables are not that big.
The page could look spammy even with 15 recips. There are a lot of LL with big recips and image recips that would make a page look very unfriendly and spammy. And there's a lot of sites listed with much bigger recip tables.


But this is not spam. A lot of LL have more than 25 link exchange and they are not spamming SE. As long as the text is unique and the page is getting links from big sites, SE won't see that as spamming. Instead SE will see those duplicate site as spamming even if they have only 5-6 recips.
Besides, I only use two links for every LL while some LL have 4-5 links in their recipe code.


But there's no small LL on the recip table Those are the biggest 25 LL according to Alexa rankings and Google PR


I do understand this You have such a great site and you have to keep it clean


I don't use "CLICK HERE" as a blind link. I alway use "Click Here for....." which is totally different. I always describe for the surfer what he's going to find. Surfers always tend to finish reading the description and then return back and click the link if they are interested. And from my stats I can see that those who were really interested clicked the links

And almost every banner has click here and they are accepted. Would you reject sites with banners that have click here or should I just open ImageReady and save click here in a gif file?
IMO there's always rules and there's a lot of ways to go around them and this is why there are human reviewers

Have a nice day Marc
Magnoody
ICQ : 331-273-525

I'm sorry man, but the two "CLICK HERE" links at the top of this site are definately blind in my opinion:
http://blacksexfiles.com/black-slut/

The reason I say they are blind is because a surfer is visiting your site through a link that refers to something "black", whether it is "black girls", "black pussy", "black sex", etc... So, they click on that link and see your site. Immediately they see "Click Here" to check some black and ebony girls. Well, that surfer is going to click on that because they think that's where they will see the content you said they were going to get when they clicked on your link to visit your site. They might not even see the ENTER link way down the page. It sets them up for failure immediately and I consider it blind.

Banner ads are banner ads... They look like ads and are not misleading. I don't care if the banner has "click here" in the banner somewhere. It's obvious that it's an ad. But I delete sites all the time that have a banner with "Click Here" right below it. Unless it says "Click Here" to visit "nameofsiteinbanner", or some other marketing message, it's considered blind.

I want the surfer to see the ENTER link. If they like the site you are advertising, they will click on it, if not, they will click ENTER and go to the next page that has more banners/ads on it. And on and on. That's the beauty of the free site. You can show ads many times during their process of viewing some free porn. Free sites are more than generous in the amount off advertising space they have available and linklists are more than generous for allowing them to advertise so much. But, linklists have to have rules to control spam or the free sites could turn into downtown Tokyo.

Regarding the number of recips... I'm sorry, our rule is 20 and we have to keep it that way. Trim off 5 tiny linklists and you probably won't notice any difference. Trim off hoes.com and keep those 5 and you will notice a big difference.

marc

[plateman]

hey mb you see my post a few back ?

[Magnoody]

Thx marc for taking the time replying to my questions
I'll build some free sites without click here and see if the CT will drop.
And I'll keep an eye on my ref stats for the next 2 weeks and remove those that sent the least traffic.
But I think there are already fs qeued for review. If you found one breaking the rules reject it, no hard feelings

[Rednax]

I know what happened then, in that case. I submitted the wrong URL to you guys back when I had a 404 popup, and thats what you saw.

I hope that clears it up, was a dumb mistake on my part getting confused and typing the wrong URL into your form.

Thanks for the clarification,

Xander

[mb]

Originally Posted by Rednax

I know what happened then, in that case. I submitted the wrong URL to you guys back when I had a 404 popup, and thats what you saw.

I hope that clears it up, was a dumb mistake on my part getting confused and typing the wrong URL into your form.

Thanks for the clarification,

Xander

I understand and will take you off the blacklist. Please note that you would never get a free site accepted that had a recip to "onlybestsex". They use four links in their recip.

Please try to put hoes.com with the other large linklists.

thanks,

marc

[tjchuck]

Hi mb or mezzanine,

I haven't had much luck lately,

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ing/index.html

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ssy/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/muffdivers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/hornymom/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/bigfunbags/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/ebo...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/but...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/int...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/chubbychick/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/pus...ers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/fuckfest/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/tightteen/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/plu...ssy/index.html

I haven't got acceptance or decline e-mails for these. Any help would be appreciated, thanks
Jay
tjchuck

[mezzanine]

Originally Posted by tjchuck

Hi mb or mezzanine,

I haven't had much luck lately,

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ing/index.html

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ssy/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/muffdivers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/hornymom/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/bigfunbags/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/ebo...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/but...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/int...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/chubbychick/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/pus...ers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/fuckfest/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/tightteen/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/plu...ssy/index.html

I haven't got acceptance or decline e-mails for these. Any help would be appreciated, thanks
Jay
tjchuck

Hi tjchuck...These sites are still in our queue waiting to be reviewed:

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ing/index.html

http://www.plethora-of-porn.com/free...ssy/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/but...ing/index.html

These sites containt content we've already had submitted to us in the past:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/hornymom/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/ebo...ing/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/int...ing/index.html

This one has a broken recip link in the recip table:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/plu...ssy/index.html

These sites were accepted:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/chubbychick/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/pus...ers/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/tightteen/index.html

I don't know why these weren't accepted:

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/bigfunbags/index.html

http://www.chucks-links.com/free/fuckfest/index.html

Feel free to resubmit these and I'll make sure they're accepted.

Chuck

[tjchuck]

Thanks Chuck,
Have a good weekend

[CrazySy]

Marc, Could you please check your pm when you get a chance? I'd really appreciate it