The New 2257 Rulings - What now?

Chop Smith · 2007-04-05, 08:04 PM

Linkster, I agree but that would be speculation. You know the AG was begging to keep his job so he could protect 'the children'.

Speaking of speculation! What happens to LinkForSex when it is required of you to have docs on images on a free site submitted to you? Based on my limited information, you can thank a staffer for getting that removed from the admendent and thus leading to discussion of the age verification requirement for Link Lists, TGPs and free sites.

BTW, this is a good time to book for XBIZ '07. Last year that lawyer siminar was worth the price of the entire trip.

Linkster · 2007-04-06, 01:27 AM

Actually Chop - Im not so sure that the requirement isnt still there - it was removed from the 2257 changes but it wasnt removed from the amendments to the Walsh bill so Im waiting to see the implementing regs which havent reared out yet - but I assume they will right around the 15th or so

As far as the age verification - I wouldnt count that one down yet either - there are many amendments already in committee that may get attached to some budget or supplementary without anyone realizing its there - that require the age verification - I think the latest one is T Stevens bill that would require both that and a statement on every page of a website as well as code labels for filters

Bill · 2007-04-06, 05:35 PM

The FSC contribution phone line number has been constantly busy, I still haven't gotten thru to make a contribution earmarked for 2257 defense.

Phone: 1-818-358-9373

from this page:

http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/ContributeForm.htm

2007-04-05, 08:04 PM	#1
Chop Smith Eighteen 'til I Die Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Mississippi Posts: 2,168	Linkster, I agree but that would be speculation. You know the AG was begging to keep his job so he could protect 'the children'. Speaking of speculation! What happens to LinkForSex when it is required of you to have docs on images on a free site submitted to you? Based on my limited information, you can thank a staffer for getting that removed from the admendent and thus leading to discussion of the age verification requirement for Link Lists, TGPs and free sites. BTW, this is a good time to book for XBIZ '07. Last year that lawyer siminar was worth the price of the entire trip. __________________ Last edited by Chop Smith; 2007-04-05 at 08:07 PM..

2007-04-06, 01:27 AM	#2
Linkster NO! Im not a female - but being a dragon, I do eat them. Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Sex Delta Posts: 5,084	Actually Chop - Im not so sure that the requirement isnt still there - it was removed from the 2257 changes but it wasnt removed from the amendments to the Walsh bill so Im waiting to see the implementing regs which havent reared out yet - but I assume they will right around the 15th or so As far as the age verification - I wouldnt count that one down yet either - there are many amendments already in committee that may get attached to some budget or supplementary without anyone realizing its there - that require the age verification - I think the latest one is T Stevens bill that would require both that and a statement on every page of a website as well as code labels for filters __________________ Pussy Chompers Porn Links NSCash

2007-04-06, 05:35 PM	#3
Bill Selling porn allows me to stay in a constant state of Bliss - ain't that a trip! Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 3,914	The FSC contribution phone line number has been constantly busy, I still haven't gotten thru to make a contribution earmarked for 2257 defense. Phone: 1-818-358-9373 from this page: http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/ContributeForm.htm