Looking for index2.html LL

[mniki]

Hi to all,

Hope someone can help me and suggest 12-16 good LL that accept recip on index2.html. I don't expect 1000 clicks per day to my free site but also would not like to submit to a LL with 10 or less clicks.
Mainly teen 18+ content on my free sites.
thx in advance for help

[virgohippy]

Instead of index2.html, why not drop it into a new dir, and keep it index.html? And if not that, at least name the page something else.

Although, if you're really looking for a way to annoy a LL reviewer submitting an annoyingly obvious mirror is a good way to do it. Some places even threaten to ban for stuff like that.

As for additional sources of traffic, the GG&J traffic resources page is a great place to start:

http://www.greenguysboard.com/resour...fic/index.html

[mniki]

I am not looking for a way to annoy a reviewer, but I am looking for a way to submit my site to as many LL I can. Have virtual hosting account with limited space can't upload same content few times.

[mniki]

Forgot to mention that In the past some of my sites were rejected for reason: content not being in the same directory as site (but same domain)

[SheepGuy]

Originally Posted by mniki

Forgot to mention that In the past some of my sites were rejected for reason: content not being in the same directory as site (but same domain)

Why would you do it that way? Since you're using a freehost, with limited space you're limiting yourself to begin with. Why not spend $20 a month or so on a pay host, register a couple of domains at $8.95 each per year and mirror them in a not-so-obvious way.
That is the much simpler way, and is very cheap as well, why not use it?
Sounds sorta like you're looking for something for nothing.
And why, even on a freehost, would you put your content in a different directory than your index?
I'll accept even obvious mirror sites, but only if the other links are to LL's that will do the same, and there are very few of them.

[virgohippy]

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

I'll accept even obvious mirror sites, but only if the other links are to LL's that will do the same, and there are very few of them.

I don't mind being on a mirror. I almost expect people to do that. I don't even require that I'm on an index page either.

mniki, again, if you're not going to make a new dir for a new index page I'd suggest you label your page some-keyword-combo.html. Just be sure to read through the LL rules before you add a recip to that page and expect to get listed, or not banned.

And SheepGuy's comment brings up a good point:

Originally Posted by SheepGuy

Sounds sorta like you're looking for something for nothing.

I hate to be a pest, but if you won't invest the necessary resources to run your business you won't send a very good message to potential business partners.

[MrYum]

Originally Posted by mniki

I am not looking for a way to annoy a reviewer, but I am looking for a way to submit my site to as many LL I can. Have virtual hosting account with limited space can't upload same content few times.

Think you guys may have mis-read his post...he says he has virtual hosting, not free hosting.

That said, the Hippy is right of course though...many reviewers (myself included) hate numbered entry pages. I'll decline for it with notice a few times, then blacklist.

Using keyword.html works for a lot of lists, but also doesn't work for some. There are multiple threads on the board about folder structures to avoid problems and still use index.html pages

I am surprised someone declined your sites for the content not being in the same folder though. Always thought as long as the content was on the same domain, it was fine. And people call me a hardass

[mniki]

No I am not using free host abendoned that long time ago, have virtual hosting account ( not dedicated server) also have few domain names.
Will spend some time searching the forum for folder structure posts.

Thx

[iMan]

Forgot to mention that In the past some of my sites were rejected for reason: content not being in the same directory as site (but same domain)

wow.. I've never got that rejection, but if I one day do, I'll stop submitting there in a snap.
I might be missing something but why would anyone care about the location of the content |confused|

I only build free sites for now, but I plan on using the same content for different things in the future so it makes most sense to have it and the ads in a separate central location that's different from where the sites reside.. cos it seems stoopid to have to upload the same exact content several times.

[MrYum]

Originally Posted by iMan

wow.. I've never got that rejection, but if I one day do, I'll stop submitting there in a snap.
I might be missing something but why would anyone care about the location of the content |confused|

I only build free sites for now, but I plan on using the same content for different things in the future so it makes most sense to have it and the ads in a separate central location that's different from where the sites reside.. cos it seems stoopid to have to upload the same exact content several times.

Well...yes and no...

Most do require that the content at least be hosted on the same domain. If we didn't, some of the nefarious types out there would hotlink to others content

[virgohippy]

iMan, a while back I experimented with dropping freesite mirrors on different domains in the hopes of getting some small SEO perk. The effect was null.

In general, I find it much easier and simpler to just keep all my freesites and mirrors in a single folder on a single domain and keep track of all my pages in a spreadsheet.

Since I treat each freesite as an independent entity, all contents are allocated to it's respective folder, and after submission is left alone. If I must make a change/substitution, I refer to my records.

And as MrYum hinted at, be wary of hotlinking to your own images across multiple domains. Preventing hotlinking from other people across all those domains while creating exceptions for your own is a real pain.|shocking|

[iMan]

Well...yes and no...

Most do require that the content at least be hosted on the same domain. If we didn't, some of the nefarious types out there would hotlink to others content

sure, I can see why the same domain would be required. That makes sense, but this was the same domain.

iMan, a while back I experimented with dropping freesite mirrors on different domains in the hopes of getting some small SEO perk. The effect was null.

Hmm.. so Google figured out that they were still doorways?
Did you keep everything except the recips the same?

In general, I find it much easier and simpler to just keep all my freesites and mirrors in a single folder on a single domain and keep track of all my pages in a spreadsheet.

Since I treat each freesite as an independent entity, all contents are allocated to it's respective folder, and after submission is left alone. If I must make a change/substitution, I refer to my records.

I personally prefere to have the content at a central place, but whatever works. All I'm saying is that it seems strange to deny listing because the pics are not in the same exact dir as the site when it's still on the same domain.

And as MrYum hinted at, be wary of hotlinking to your own images across multiple domains. Preventing hotlinking from other people across all those domains while creating exceptions for your own is a real pain.

yeah, I wouldn't do it accross domains... just within the same domain.
Anyways, I'm just using 1 domain for now

[virgohippy]

Originally Posted by iMan

Hmm.. so Google figured out that they were still doorways?
Did you keep everything except the recips the same?

Only recips, copyright notice, and 2257 url changed, but the sites weren't unique enough otherwise for google, msn, or yahoo to be loved. It was a lot of work and I saw no significant benefit.

I get far more attention far easier from the big three, especially google, when I re-write the text on my mirrors to read something a little different.