Greenguy's Board


Go Back   Greenguy's Board > Link Lists & Getting Listed
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2008-09-01, 12:14 PM   #1
elKabong
And Lord, we are especially thankful for nuclear power, the cleanest, safest
energy source there is. Except for solar, which is just a pipe dream
 
elKabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 225
2257 Compliance Statement

Do link list owners look at, or care about 2257 statments on submitted free sites?

I've been doing some research into 2257 and I'm still a bit confused about whether the statement is needed only on the index page, or on every page of a site?

I looked at some random free sites and every one seems to do it differently, so that didn't help me much.

Then I looked at a few link lists and I'm still confused:

LOR - couldn't find a 2257 statement, but did see RTA/ASCAP labels.

Smutgremlins - 2257 statement on index page only.

Cleo's - 2257 statement on every page.

If I only put a 2257 statement on the index page, could that cause a site to be rejected?

Thanks!
elKabong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-01, 04:28 PM   #2
balls_deep
If you really need money, you can sell your kidney or even your car
 
balls_deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 374
Quote:
Originally Posted by elGordo View Post
If I only put a 2257 statement on the index page, could that cause a site to be rejected?

Thanks!
nope, i have a statement on every page and get accepted everywhere.
balls_deep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-01, 06:12 PM   #3
elKabong
And Lord, we are especially thankful for nuclear power, the cleanest, safest
energy source there is. Except for solar, which is just a pipe dream
 
elKabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by balls_deep View Post
nope, i have a statement on every page and get accepted everywhere.
You're right, I've seen a lot of free sites with the statement on every page, but my preference would be to have it on the index page only and so was wondering whether link list owners care one way or the other.

The original 2257 reg required that the statement be on every page, but then during the open comment period it appeared that the DOJ was willing to go with index page only, and now it seems the whole law is up in limbo so I'm not sure what's what.

The thing is that I don't want to put an extra outgoing link on each page if I don't have to.
elKabong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-01, 07:34 PM   #4
Licker4U
Mean people suck, nice people swallow, are you mean or nice?
 
Licker4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Lower Alabama-The Redneck Riviera
Posts: 2,376
Send a message via ICQ to Licker4U Send a message via AIM to Licker4U
Quote:
Originally Posted by elGordo View Post
The thing is that I don't want to put an extra outgoing link on each page if I don't have to.
Why? No one is going to click it and if they do they won't get much. It's a small bit of html that won't detract from the site. Look at the bottom of this page. You have a problem putting that on every page? It's nothing. It may not be totally 2257 compliant but it's just another line of defense if you need it.
__________________
Submit to Girls That Squirt , Hairy Pussy Links and Best Wet Pussy
Licker4U is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-02, 07:20 AM   #5
elKabong
And Lord, we are especially thankful for nuclear power, the cleanest, safest
energy source there is. Except for solar, which is just a pipe dream
 
elKabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Licker4U View Post
You have a problem putting that on every page?
If I'm only allowed three outgoing links per page, why waste one on a 2257 notice?

I realize that manually reviewed link lists might allow the additional outgoing link, but what about link lists that use scripts to check submissions?
elKabong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-02, 09:39 AM   #6
Maya
Trying is the first step towards failure
 
Maya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 120
Your 2257 link does not count against the three outgoing links rule.
I actually doubt than any serious LL would use scripts for reviewing, as far as I know they all check the submitted sites manually.

I am submitting to as many as 81 LLs for some niches (9 mirrors of 9 recips each) and I never had a FS rejected for having 3 sponsorlinks + the 2257 link.

I did have one rejected for having the 2257 opening in a new window, so make sure not to do that
__________________
Hardlinks & Submissions:
ErotiCult - Submit here - PM for trade. My Freesites
Maya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2008-09-02, 06:28 PM   #7
elKabong
And Lord, we are especially thankful for nuclear power, the cleanest, safest
energy source there is. Except for solar, which is just a pipe dream
 
elKabong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maya View Post
I actually doubt than any serious LL would use scripts for reviewing, as far as I know they all check the submitted sites manually.
Kewl! Thanks for the info.

I didn't realize that most link lists would check sites manually. I just assumed that they would use scripts, or at least use a script to check for outgoing links, image size, etc. to screen out sites that don't follow the basic rules.

I learn something new every day...
elKabong is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Mark Read
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc