|
|
2009-04-24, 11:45 PM | #1 |
ICQ:147*079*406
|
Im not against it. Im against the real shit. But I cant say that seeing someone dressed up in a plaid skirt and white shirt with ponytail and black leather shoes makes it a bad thing. I personally feel that most if not all do it in a playful so far over the top way that it comes off as totally fake - if that type of site helps get a guy off and keeps him from living it out..Im OK with it.
__________________
The Sexy Side of Porn |
2009-04-25, 09:29 AM | #2 | |
If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 249
|
Quote:
Bottom line: it's a fantasy, and as long as the gals are 18 or older I don't have much problem simply because, as you mention, I would prefer the creeps be looking at 18-21 yos in those outfits and jerking off ... with the legal statements on the page! .... than to actually go try to do something IRL where they either don't check IDs or specifically look for ones under legal age. As mentioned above, the 18 is federal, while some states are lower ... some much lower.
__________________
"TGP2 Queen" and yes, still crazy! My TGP2 articles on right hand side |
|
2009-04-25, 12:25 PM | #3 | |
Lonewolf Internet Sales
|
Quote:
It really comes down to the perceived intent. An entire site built around that petite 18 year old in such attire and settings is obviously targeting a surfer with a "younger than legal" fantasy. Yes, still a fantasy and still completely legal, but one that I want absolutely no part of on any of my sites. |
|
2009-04-25, 12:38 PM | #4 | |
You can now put whatever you want in this space :)
|
I agree when people say "to each his own". That's is why we have our own sites. We can decide what goes on it (or not). I have nothing against young looking women (or BDSM type sites). I would and do list those. None-the-less, I personally feel uncomfortable with implied CP (and implied rape). If there is a notion that the person is not consenting then I have an issue.
Toby you put it very well. Quote:
|
|
|
|