Your submission:
Site Name: Nasty Poppy
Site URL: http://galleries.chasing-white-booty...es/cwb4-poppy/
Category: Interracial_Hardcore

Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links

Can you please tell me how to fix this??


thx

It's a couple of your recip links - you can read this thread for more info & examples of how to fix them (if you choose to do so)
http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=44552

Your submission:
Site Name: Ass Fucking Pornstars
Site URL: http://www.smutguy.com/links/freesit...nal/index.html
Category: Anal_Sex

Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links

not sure where Blind or Misleading Links is

This site was declined for content not fitting catagory: http://www.best-wet-pussy.com/babe2/...-ejaculations/

What's not "Reality" about squirting?

There's a couple in your recips - blue candy & sort links are 2 of them.

And while we're talking about your recips, you seem to have 10 lbs of shit in a 5 lb bag - that Sex Seek recip is too wide & fucking everything up.

You're kidding, right?

thank you for the advice and help... i will drop and rearrange the recipts that you have mentioned

Not at all, it's very real but I guess you don't think it is. What then is "Reality" porn? It's really all make believe and fantasy. Secretaries fucking the boss? Yeah, right. School teachers fucking at school? I doubt it. We know they're porn actors making a buck. We're just fulfilling fantasies so if surfers believe something is real then we and the sponsors have done our jobs. Your thoughts?

Based on your thinking, ANY porn can go into a reality porn category.

Reality porn, like reality TV, is the fake stuff that might be real if it wasn't scripted - bang bus, the cable guy, this ridiculous pizza site, etc.

Your submission:
Site Name: Whaletails and Nice Asses
Site URL: http://www.lusciousdelights.com/fsapr08/whale2tail/
Category: Lingerie

Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Site Does Not Fit Into The Category



AND

Your submission:
Site Name: Whaletails and Nice Asses
Site URL: http://www.lusciousdelights.com/fsapr08/whale2tail/
Category: Reality_Sex

Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Site Does Not Fit Into The Category


Have you got something I could put this in? Didn't see a general hardcore....

I did look at each gallery & try to come up with a quick fix, but nothing came to mind :(

I'll catch you in the next one then...thanks for the consideration.

http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...ink-o-ramacom/
Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links ... Show me ?
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...uneedfreeporn/
Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links ... Show me ?
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...ealitypornxxx/
Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links ... Show me ?
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...y/hoescomporn/
Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Reviewer Is Uncomfortable With Content |shocking|

Help me to make the necessary corrections my lord ... ??? Explain ?

Lord?

Buff - 1st off, why is the name of a link list in the URL of each free site?

As far as the Blind or Misleading Links, they are in the recips - like the one that has "Free Sex Pics - Sexy Latinas Nude" for the text - that's a blind link.

For the "Reviewer Is Uncomfortable With Content" rejection, I'm uncomfortable with girls having sex with fake over-sized cocks.

Lord - It's a joke ... OK ... Nothing bad ...
1st off, why is the name of a link list in the URL of each free site? - Is this some problem ?

For the recips I understood ...

For the "Reviewer Is Uncomfortable With Content" rejection, I'm uncomfortable with girls having sex with fake over-sized cocks. - So,may be you have to write in your rules " no promoting sites with fake things or something like that ... "

Thanks for the attention

Yes.

It's 2 fake cocks! I didn't know I had to make a rule that the cocks had to be real |crazy|

I'm not in your head and I don't know what you think about fake sites and so on ... |huh

and you don't mean only for fake cocks(suppose) ... fake amateurs and so on ... |yawn|

That's why you have to write something when you don't list free sites which promote fake(scene or as this case "fake cocks" ... ) pay sites ...

Can you tell me what's wrong with this one?
 

http://hosted.freepornfilth.com/emilianna/01/index.html

It's hosted on my own server?

I rejected it because the template is someone else's.

Shit you got me! ;) I'll came up with some new CSS and resubmit. Has given me an idea though to write a script that takes 6 movies and spews out random templates.

You copy the work of a trusted submitter & that's all you can say for yourself?

Site Name: Huge Cock Sex
Site URL: http://www.smutguy.com/links/freesit...ard/index.html
Category: Big_Cock

Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Site Structure Violation

smutguy - it's like looking at 3 different sites with you :) The warning page is all white, the main page is all blue & the gallery pages are blue tables on a white background. My suggestion is try to make all the pages with the same color scheme.

thank you for the advice i will make the proper adjustments

This site was rejected for blind or misleading links: http://www.best-wet-pussy.com/black-pussy-white-cock/

Where?

Licker - it's that bottom right recip.

Sorry about that, I've had several other sites accepted at Porn Movie Links with that link lists recip in place and didn't even think about it. I'll get it fixed.

Is there still a problem with the movies (hoping it may just have been a temp glitch)? They all play fine for me with WMP 11 in both IE and FF.

Like I said I'll fix that recip link. But why have all my submits up till now been accepted with that link lists recip in place? (Different catagories but the same format) I only checked the last ten submits but I know there are more. You've been on this blind links in recip tables thing for quite some time now and this is the first time I've been notified about a problem. Since I use SSI I'll go and fix all previously submitted sites but a little consistency would be helpful. Since all previous sites were accepted I thought everything was fine. What am I to think? |huh

2nd gallery - movie #7 - the text underneath the thumb links to a different movie (probably a typo) LMK when it's fixed & I'll add it in there for ya.

I missed it until now. I can go back & remove the accepted sites if you want. |couch|

Don't worry about the sites that were accepted - they will stay in there, regardless of if you fix the recip or not. I think I rejected more than one, so PM me the URL's once you've fixed the recip & I'll add them by hand.

The two that were rejected have been fixed and re-submitted this morning before I saw your post.

Oops, newbie mistake. :(
Fixed and thanks!

Site URL: http://www.greatsex4me.com/teen12/
Category: Big_Cock

Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Grammar Or Spelling Errors

Site URL: http://www.hotlove4me.com/bigteens/
Category: Big_Cock

Has been rejected and it will not be listed. Reason:
Grammar Or Spelling Errors
I spelt stretched wrong i can see that

Please tell me that's a joke.

(and my problem was before the word "stretched")

Have received a few declines in a row. Reason: "Invalid or No Recip Link". I've checked and found that links are ok. For example the last rejected site:
http://www.crueldick.com/jamie_n_kylee/index.html

Reminds me of what my brother said after graduating with a degree in engineering "When I started I couldn't even spell engineer, now I are one" |jester|

It's the Snizzshare recips (seeing as that's not a link list, it should not be in with the recips)

I think Jay said he was taking all the 3rd party links out of his recips this week.

No joke Greeny just a legit request
I will use rogets and a spellchecker next time
I just dont see the error.

I was an Engineer before I retired
Who said Engineers needs spell (its all about the maths)

I shot up a lot of text for the search engines maybe surfers spell like what i can..lol

If we fix a rejected site and re-submit do we need to wait 24 hrs. to submit a new site?

Yes