The question is where are you hosted your whois information is not clear on that for this domain.

That to do?

Site Name: Indian Princess Pussy
Site URL: http://www.pornlinksfordummies.com/fs/idg/1/2a/
Category: India

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Missing Images or Movies



Not sure why, but two mpgs weren't uploaded...this has now been fixed...should I resubmit? Sorry about this...I'll double check better in the future and make sure it doesn't happen again.

Please resubmit :)

Rejected Site
 

Hi Guys,

Thanks for considering us, we were rejected because "That's Not A Free Site". The URL is http://www.hotswhat.com/categories/lesbian

Our site is totally free :( - there is no where to sign up to pay.... And we have lots of free images.

We would be very grateful if someone could have a look over for us please?

Many thanks!

Andrew

That's not what a Link List considers a "Free Site". Please go back & re-read the rules:
http://www.link-o-rama.com/greenguy/therules.htm

Hi Greenie,

I have read over them again (especially number 1), we have a site with the warning page, entrance galleries clearly located below, and 300+ pics. I am not trying to be rude or smart (we are new to this, so please be forgiving), but I still don't understand why you don't consider it a free site?

Thanks again for your time!

Cheers,
Andrew

Surf the L-O-R and see what's listed on any category page. The definition of free site for most link lists is a warning page, a main page (with links to the galleries) and usually 2 or 3 gallery pages. Most free sites have around 24 pics on two galleries -or- 120 seconds of movie clips on two galleries. Also, most free sites won't give away more than those 24 pics or 120 seconds of clips. Their entire purpose is it push traffic towards a paysite, not become the place for the surfer to relieve himself.

Hi,

I read that as a 'minimum' number of photos (not a maximum). I have been happily accepted by other link exchanges. I will consider making a reduced site in the future and re-submitting.

Thanks for your time.

Andrew.

I get the impression what I would need to do, if you are still accepting story sites, is to pull a sample of a dozen or so stories, make them public (and pretty), set up a proper entry page and have it drive to the forum proper?

Or is the Otherlists what cases like ours are for?

Thank you.

I don't link to forums.

Hi GG,

Got http://www.lesbianpornnews.com/lesbians-using-dildos/ rejected for: Movies Will Not Load. I checked in IE & Firefox and can view the movies in both, is it the fact that they are embedded that caused the rejection?

Thanks :)

They do play for me, but let me check with MML as he reviewed it.

It was a problem I had with a browser setting it will be in the next update :)

Thanks guys :)

Hi, folks, got a rejection based on category, which I could use some help with. I put This site linked here under "Public Nudity" and it's two girls flashing their bodies on a public highway, using a car as a prop. Where can I find a better definition of what public nudity should be, and how to categorise sites like this which could really go into any one of three or four categories, on the face of it. In fact, as a newcomer, a list of definitions would be very useful if anyone knows of one.

There is also the one linked here. I submitted it and got your automated reply to my email address on 16 Jan, while you were all away, but have never received an official acceptance or rejection letter. Did it get lost in the system, or has it been rejected? I need to know on what basis to resubmit, i.e. whether to make changes first.

Many thanks on both counts.

Would you believe me if I said my reviewer was being too cautious? :D I'll have it listed with the next update.

Do you remember which category you submitted this one too? If it wasn't TeenSologirls then that's the reason (which is the same problem as above)

I have a couple of Sologirl categories that are for Free Sites that promote the paysite of a specific model/girl (a sologirl site) So anytime we see submits come in that belong in a sologirl category, we reject it.

And, as dumb as this sounds, this current manner of thinking may change in the near future - but for now, Free Sites promoting a Sologirl have to be submitted into a Sologirl category.

Thanks, Greenie. I'll have another go at getting the earlier one right.

Hi, I'm back, already. :) Got another rejection which says refer to webmaster and the help on different rejections says that's one to post here. This is the link and the free site is about a girl sticking toys up herself. The pics aren't strictly in order, for visual impact and layout, but I doubt if that's the reason.

What have I done this time? |badidea|

I think it's one of 2 things (or both) The text box with the warning text in it is left aligned (rest of the page is centered) and the 1st pic in gallery 2 doesn't go with the rest of the pics.

Ah. OK, thanks, greenie. I've fixed the first one - that's an IE bug I was going back to fix the stylesheet for anyway. I'll fix the pic and resubmit.

Cheers.

You've got me stumped. The text is centred - I've checked in IE6 which is the worst wrecker of good web sites since IE5 and is now so far out of date I'm getting just a few visitors using it. My site works. I've swapped the images, and they all go together.

Thanks for looking and responding so quickly, but since you told me what was wrong and I fixed it, what's it about?

horney - ugh. Let me see what my reviewer (who's ICQ is off) has to say. I'll get this sorted out :)

horny - I just noticed that when you mouseover the recips, the text disappears (hover link color is the same as the background) That might be what my reviewer saw.

I know I'd get confused if I put my mouse on some text & the words vanished.

Oh, shit. Playing with which colours worked best, missed that. I'll fix it. Thanks.