Your friend, yeah right friend lol |bananna|

I would imagine it comes down to shooting. As long as content providers aren't shooting asses only, no webmaster's gonna feel comfortable chucking the rest of the shoot. If webmasters shoot their own content or pay for custom, it's more doable, but still. The girl's willing to be in porn. You really gonna not take shots of her tits?

Also, getting the girls isn't necessarily easy. A subset of girls shoot for porn, and a subset of those have nice asses. Don't necessarily need Keyra-level, but definitely very nice. That's why you don't see "Nice Tits" as a category, only "Big Tits". Easier to find big tits than it is to find nice tits (and I'm not a fan of the fakies look). The only consistent category where there is a specifically elevated standard as part of the category is "Babes", which is general as it is.

I have to disagree here. Most webmasters catering to a specific niche and who is worth his salt would be quite happy to cull the set in favour of those specific shots his members are interested in.
There is no 'nice tits' category because 'nice' is subjective.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and the internet drives that point home. What you consider to be a nice ass or tits may or may not appeal to someone else. In a highly targeted niche, members are quite happy to forego the "one million photos" in order to have the 2000 that they are specifically interested in; and pay a premium in the process.

A recent example: Last week I requested that members of balloon-guys.com email me with feedback to a couple of specific questions. The response was unanimous. They have zero interest in us adding a bit of gay oriented but non-balloon fetish material as a bonus, nor are they the least bit interested in live cam upsells. They come for the highly prized and rare collection of material we provide, and nothing more.
Did I mention that these members are incredibly loyal too? :-)

Simon's and Emmanuelle's posts illustrate what I said before. If (for example) asses don't turn you on, then don't do that niche. If Simon were to try it it would be a failure. But if you are turned on by asses, then there is a lot of money to be made there. On the other hand, something that turns Simon on, and that he would make a fortune at, would fail if an ass fan tried it.

As to the comment "The girl's willing to be in porn. You really gonna not take shots of her tits?" I can't speak for tits/ass shots, but if I were doing a photoshoot of two women wrestling (one of my turn ons) and they suggested doing some lesbian stuff, my thought would be "I am paying for wrestling, wrestling is hard to get. But lesbian is easy to get, so why waste the studio/models time (neither is cheap) on lesbian stuff?" I would guess that since ass stuff is harder to get than tit stuff the same would apply.

I can't think of a single set I own where I've used every photo in it.

I have sets I have bought for just a couple of pictures that would suit a fetish I do. I don't use the other pictues on that site as my fetish surfers want that fetish and nothing else.

http://bellydancefetish.com/

(A pet project of mine I haven't had time for -- destined to be mostly softcore, though)

Woo Hoo! Softcore is absolutely fine! It's the teasing and glimpses of what could be that are so appealing!
|bow|

There are a bunch of Clips4Sale stores specializing in sneezing . . . and seems to be enough interest to support all of them.

I think one problem with doing a whole sneeze fetish site is the potential problems with payment processors taking issue with snot. You think I'm kidding, but I'm not.

There are a lot of sexy butt sites out there, it's just that a lot of sites that are hardcore have the word "butt" in the title.

Sunny Dollars has True Butts, Pimp Roll has Really Nice Asses

But I do agree, I think the term "butt" should be for sexy asses & leave "anal" to the hardcore stuff.

Many of the so called "niche" sites in the major sponsors' portfolios are just tours that get the surfer to the same collection of porn (a lot of it is junk feed anyway). Any wonder those sales don't retain? I am selling a gay uniform site by a big sponsor, it converts ok, but retains very poorly.

male squirting...........stu--->|couch|

I'd like to see more quality somnophilia sites that aren't "drunk" sites. Girl-on-guy sleepy sex in particular.

Also some more reverse gang bang would be nice.

You do see a lot of Indian (Asian Indian) porn on the market already, in my opinion. But what you don't see is arab and persian women. In my experience, the culture is a lot more conservative and "family honor" based, so good luck finding too many of them doing porn.

I saw a Lesbian Bukkake clip with Ashley Blue that I thought was pretty different!

Damn I'd be curious to see that. She's a champ.

You can check them out here.
http://jerkoffzone.com/divx/lesbianbukkake/

Nice thanks!