Greenguy's Board - what i have notice

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)

- Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)

- - what i have notice (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=5929)

I prefer the term coed. That congers up the right image in my targets eyes. :D

Quote:

Originally posted by spazlabz
"Watch these over the age of 18 yet not to mature women as they engage in consensual sex with a partner of their choosing while sober and after carefully considering the ramifications of their action.
Get relatively quick access to the pictures and videos of the event by moving forward to the next page"

LMFAO!!|jester|

I don't like schoolgirl either. I try to use college coed, or something like that. I think "young woman" is a good replacement for "young girl". I guess having children (especially daughters) tends to make me look at it a little heavier than most people. I agree that we are under heavy scrutiny, but it goes with the biz. It is the downside, but the upside is being able to sit here and work at 2 o'clock am. in my panties and a t-shirt. :)

must... control ... self

cant... make ... lewd comment..... about ..... milf in panties!

|jester|

Hey Sec_man, you know after re-reading what you had said about if one accepts MILFs doing a younger man, than why not accept a young woman doing an older guy...than why not list that dads&babes stuff (if it's done tastefully)

I still get some of that content, but not to my surprise, the same guy who was submitting that, just started submitting the index linked to nothing but a full page add!

LOL...guess I started declining sooner than I thaught. I'm still accepting the dads&babes stuff...but only if it's done in a tastefull way though.

|peace|

I know one of the main reasons I don't list those sites is not only the wording on alot of them, but the fact that the 2257 info is nowhere to be found. There is a little disclaimer written on the sponsor site, but no link to it. And I personally would much rather err on the side of caution.....
Jaden

Quote:

Originally posted by CybrFire
Hey Sec_man, you know after re-reading what you had said about if one accepts MILFs doing a younger man, than why not accept a young woman doing an older guy...than why not list that dads&babes stuff (if it's done tastefully)

I still get some of that content, but not to my surprise, the same guy who was submitting that, just started submitting the index linked to nothing but a full page add!

LOL...guess I started declining sooner than I thaught. I'm still accepting the dads&babes stuff...but only if it's done in a tastefull way though.

|peace|

yup, i think that is the real key to all this, as owners we seem to be too quick on the delete button many times. i like volume and unless its a real violation, not just worded funny i will list it.

jaden, that is a good point. but keep in mind there are 2257 statements on a lot of ****** sites too. Technically they are legal because of the "non-sexual" loophole. many times i see sites with full on legal 2257 statements that say things like "the models depected here are all in non sexual situations" instead of flat out "all models appearing on this website were over 18 at the time of photography"

just keep in mind that just cuz they have a legal 2257 doesnt mean you wanna have anything to do with em :)

Any UK webmasters watching Eastenders right now (the 2nd biggest soap on UK TV) broadcast by the BBC - they have an incest stroyline running right now - Has there been much in the press about lately?