Maybe I'll move in with Stu…

LOL Cleo For Women They Have a HAven for Women and ya get Lodged with a Big Bull Dyke Named DORA and she has more facial hair than most men.

LOL no joke I used to work in a female Pen and I worked with some high profile women. Diane Downs to name one could have spit in that bithes child killing face but Didnt because of regs. Ilove how TV made her like she was pretty and all but that bitch is BUTT UGLY . Anyhow you'd be surprised the stuff yoou see and hear in a female pen. It was nothing to get offered Blowjobs everyday,and they always wanted to buy whole bananas and pickles, cucumbers for 10 bucks each Damn I wish I was Joe Grocer then I could have made a Killling.

hahhaa Hyaaaaa cleo good to see you again, and yep its great to be nuts |jackinthe

Heck, if I've got to go to jail, not passing go, can I get boob implants and claim to be a tranny and go to the female jail?
|thumb

I think you would need to change something besides your chest since it's genitals that determine which jail you get sent to. :D

Oh darn it |verysad

Yep. I think the whole new 2257 flap is about the fact that the feds are very very scared to bring content-based obscenity prosecutions now, since, as the Extreme case showed, even a "conservative" district may find certain content "not obscene" thereby creating a bad precedent (from the feds viewpoint) for future prosecutions.

Whereas, the 2257 scheme is a "regulation," not a law, and therefore will be civil prosecution, not criminal. Under civil prosecution, the criterion is merely "preponderance of the evidence" so one cannot use the 1st amendment as a defense - the only question a lawyer can defend on or a jury can rule on is "was the webmaster in compliance with the written rules or not?" It's a much easier prosecution from the government's point of view, since ambiguous and flexible definitions like "what is obscenity" don't have to enter into the case. If your records aren't in order or you aren't home when the feds knock, you are automatically guilty without a judge or jury having to judge the content as obscene or not.