|  | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Why would a few not allow the affilate the option? | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Read into that what what you will. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Thats nothing I pushed a site which was on CCBill then moved via some other system to Nats. - sorry my Nats rant |loony| Since the move they have added sms as a payment option because they said Nats supported it, now I make like 3 US cents per sale instead of $14.99! For one month now I have asked when it will be fixed and nothing has been done, to top all this off they also LOST my sales - on the friday night they were there, me and the sponsor saw them the next morning they were gone, about 400 USD. To this day no one has explained what happened, I got paid the missing money not before the sponor offered to pay half as a good gesture. I have two other Nats one I had started to build up though after getting the above issues I am not doing anything till I get paid and told what happened to the figures. | 
| 
 I've said this before - The person/company the comes out with something that combines the flexibility, cascading, and tracking power of NATS with the timely and combined payouts of CCBill will make a killing.  That's my biggest gripe (sorry, nothing about encoded urls, etc).  Internal payouts almost required a shift to higher payout levels, which smaller fish (like me) may take ages to reach, especially when testing new sponsors... I guess I'm just spoiled by CCBill's combining sales and timely payouts.  Imagine if NATS were partnered with a company to do all payouts; instead of having to make $100 PER SPONSOR to get a payout, all sales from all sponsors counted together a la CCBill, and you KNEW you'd be getting a check every week instead of wondering whether or not a sponsor who pays out internally has their shit together, struggling with some sponsors to hit a high payout level, etc.  Pipe dream perhaps, but somebody should get on that and make some bank!  :) | 
| 
 Hello, Mr Smith Quote: 
 Let me pull a DD here. The above is nothing more than a Chop speculation. | 
| 
 If NATS annoys you, take heart, NATS may not be used by very many people much longer. There's a new system about to be unvieled that's objectively proven to be better than NATS in many ways and costs a LOT less. The NATS folks stole code from the wrong people and rather than hiring lawyers to go after NATS legally they hired programmers to go after NATS business - very good programmers. NATS' days are numbered. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 |smooch| |blowjob| |assfuck| |cheers| | 
| 
 Moral of the story: Don't fuck with programmers. | 
| 
 Will it use encoded affiliate ID's? | 
| 
 Quote: 
 No encoding of your ID needed that I can see, though, just let you use either any of the below URLs, whichever you choose. This is easy enough: http://domain.com/hosted/index.html?nads=chopsshit http://domain.com/hosted/?nads=chopsshit http://domain.com/hosted/index.html/nads=chopsshit http://domain.com/hosted/nads=chopsshit http://domain.com/hosted/index.html/nadsEQchopsshit http://domain.com/hosted/nadsEQchopsshit Chop would probably want to use this version: http://domain.com/hosted/index.html/nadsEQchopsshit | 
| 
 As far as on hosted promos, all that foreign characters like "EQ" needs to be left out. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 | 
| 
 If my affiliate id is 'chopsshit', yes the 'EQ' is foreign to my affiliate ID. Now if the "EQ' is static, it is not a problem to do gnats=EQ%affcode%. I fully understand the "QMYDPHPRDX" in StrongBox, but that kind of bullshit has no purpose in passing affiliate ids on promo stuff. If affiliate ids are top secret, then I might be the second most trusted person in this biz. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 http://domain.com/hosted/nads=chopsshit http://domain.com/hosted/nadsEQchopsshit EQ means = | 
| 
 :D The equal sign will work just fine for old Chop.  Only have to hit one key. | 
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 AM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
	
	© Greenguy Marketing Inc