Amen.

And for my own 2 cents, regarding the assumption that women need romance and softcore imagery, whenever I actually DO take the time to look at anything, it's generally a hardcore penetration shot or gangbang stuff, so long as the image supports the interpretation that SHE'S the one getting some action and enjoying it.

Most of what's out there is one-dimensional and too solely male-targeted -- and it's wayyyyy too base and aggressive. "Dirty fuckin whore chokin on cock" is NOT likely to entice me to click on whatever crap has that description linked to it. It's more likely to make my stomach churn and congratulate myself on not leaving the house alone too often.

And consider buying a Tazer. And a gun. And a big dog. And learning Karate.

WHEN I bother to look at anything at all, I prefer genuine amateur stuff, especially when it comes from a ballsy chick with the backbone to grab a guy by the back of the head and demand some action. The few times I actually have gone to see any live content, it's certainly been amateur, from couples with a strong female.

If what was out there was more about female pleasure, as opposed to reinforcing the "brainless degraded fuckin' whore" fantasy, I might give a shit.

In the meantime, making my own, my way, is my preferred form of erotic entertainment.

Hmm, another scientific study in progress about male/female views on porn. It will be interesting to see the final results.
http://www.xxxmina.com/webmasters.html

I like the line at the end though!
"It's a losing battle for those trying to fight such addictions by ridding society of pornography. A better understanding of ourselves may go much further. "

Tickler you used the wrong URL there.

Wait, I found it by other means. It's this, right?
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/colum...orn_more_.html

I have to say, I'd get bored with having to look at hot or not pictures too. But if it was pics of people actually having sex, you'd have a very different result, I suspect.

I remember back when the Internet first became popular, I knew guys that bought a computer just so they could download really crappy images in binary format, usually tying up a phone line for hours on a slow modem. It was new, it was exciting, and 99.9999% male. Most women wouldn't go to the trouble.

I know a lot of the “women this, men that” are generalities and there are exceptions, but after reading some of the replies I am thinking women (generally speaking, there are always exceptions) are maybe more...I dunno, "discriminating" when it comes to this stuff.

Ooops! Yeah, you got the link right.

I guess I was saving the URL for Minas site at the same time, and overwrote the one on the clipboard!

I tend to think it may have a more biological base though. Guys tend to look at female sex parts because those parts have evolved to atract male attention. Notice I highlighted the LOOK.

I also figure females tend to be more thinking about whether the male will be a good provider. Notice I highlighted the THINKING.

So males are maybe more visually stimulated, and females are maybe more mentally stimulated.

That won't figure with most of the girls I know.... Most of their boyfriends are losers!

I think looking for the “provider” is a taught/learned behavior not instinctive. Too many girls fall for the “bad boys” when they're young only to get burned – most learn, some don’t.

I don't like to get into the sex vs provider argument because sometimes I feel it doesn't fit and it's a bit simplistic.

Emjay mentioned the study where it was women who were looking at the sex bits, not the men. Here's an article on it:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19330231/

The statistic I always hang my hat on is Neilsen Netratings finding that 30% of all porn surfers are women. Not as much as men, but plenty significant.