Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   General Business Knowledge (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Sites that accept the new Link O'Rama Trusted Submitter format (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=48261)

papagmp 2008-08-02 04:02 PM

My LL will accept sites based on Greenie's rules - add it to your list!

Greenguy 2008-08-02 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Star Man (Post 412963)
If |greenguy| wouldn't mind doing it,I think the best way to actually KNOW who's "trusted" would be to list them on right on his locked submit page.If they aren't on that page then obviously they aren't "trusted".What do you think about that idea Green Guy?

No, because I don't think anyone should go by who I trust & do not trust.

I will say that everyone I have as a trusted submitter is from this board & for the most part, I think people can guess who's trusted & who isn't.

I guarantee that you do not trust everyone I trust & vice versa.

Preacher 2008-08-02 05:05 PM

I'll take anything from partners and the new rules are fine for most of the others who submit as well.

Pretty much as long as you aren't trying to screw the surfer, your site should be fine.

Licker4U 2008-08-02 05:55 PM

I just thought of something that's going to help Greenie and a lot of others as well. It's not very often that I change my recip tables so every site that goes out has the same recip grouping. This is going to shake up the recip tables on a LOT of sites. Less repetition is a good thing for all (I think)

tigermom 2008-08-03 01:36 AM

I think I need to go over the rules at PB and Tommy's and see what kind of a hybrid FS comes out when merging them with the new trusted submitter rules at LOR. Looking forward to doing some freesites sometime - expect lots of good looking guys :D

Cucumber 2008-08-03 07:19 AM

Hey hey, add me to the list also ;)

tigermom 2008-08-03 10:16 AM

Forgot to mention. I know a few of you send submits to xlef every now and again - I've always had very flexible rules so the ones in the submitters section on LOR work just fine.

HC-Majick 2008-08-03 11:10 AM

My LL's will also accept freesites from board members built following the new LOR trusted submitter rules. |thumb

Surfn 2008-08-03 12:38 PM

A trusted submitter at LOR is always welcome at Surfn's Links...

bluemoney 2008-08-03 01:32 PM

I'v now added this message to my sub page;

Attention: Trusted LOR Submitters!!
Please Insert The Letters LOR At The End Of Your Description!

SheepGuy 2008-08-03 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Surfn (Post 413120)
A trusted submitter at LOR is always welcome at Surfn's Links...

How do I go about getting a PA with you?

Surfn 2008-08-03 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SheepGuy (Post 413135)
How do I go about getting a PA with you?

Send me an email with a link to this page...

hashbury 2008-08-03 02:13 PM

My tiny little link list's will also accept the new trusted submitter sites.

Licker4U 2008-08-03 02:54 PM

I had an idea all this would shake things up but I had no idea it would affect me as much as it already has. I've received several submits already from board members that have never submitted to me before |bananna| Oddly enough, they didn't take advantage of the 4 links out |huh And remember, all three of my lists are open to LOR trusted submitters |pimpin

Greenie |yourock

hashbury 2008-08-03 02:58 PM

Using 3 links is a habit i think. I made my free site and totally forgot i could use 4 links.

Pagan 2008-08-03 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U (Post 413150)
I had an idea all this would shake things up but I had no idea it would affect me as much as it already has. I've received several submits already from board members that have never submitted to me before ...
Greenie |yourock


Hehehe.. some of us are still ramping back up, and working on our recip tables. This has been a great resource, and perfectly timed. I will say, too, that I am seeing link lists that I have not noticed before.

As far as structural changes, I am not planning on making many. You may see a bonus gallery tossed in here and there, but I don't want to increase links out or clutter my clean porn up with much else. It is just cool knowing I can add these promo tools and who will accept them.

Thanks for all the hard work, and I love seeing all these new places to submit.

Licker4U 2008-08-03 04:31 PM

After checking all the posts about the new LOR rules I count 29 link lists that will follow suit. i make recip tables using 9 or 12 recips/table so we need a few more to get on the wagon.

Floyd 2008-08-03 06:00 PM

Any sites using the new rules are more then welcome at either of my sites.

SheepGuy 2008-08-03 06:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U (Post 413150)
IOddly enough, they didn't take advantage of the 4 links out |huh

Greenie |yourock

I'm experimenting a bit with the whole links out thing. I do well with my AVS sites that have no links out before the signup page so I'm working on a kind of meld of styles that fits the fs format with less ads.

papagmp 2008-08-03 06:34 PM

Hell - I just got all my templates for the old format finished - LOL

I'll build a few as soon as I have time to redo a few recip tables.

I too have received more sites in the new format that I initially thought I would!

Nice to see we're not all stuck in the old rut.

papagmp 2008-08-03 07:24 PM

And I count 42 LL's that will accept the new format.

I already submit to 35 of them and 7 that I will add to my list.

Licker4U 2008-08-03 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papagmp (Post 413186)
And I count 42 LL's that will accept the new format.

42?? I've gone over both threads and come up with 30. I need a drink and maybe I can count better....|waves|

Licker4U 2008-08-03 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papagmp (Post 413183)
Hell - I just got all my templates for the old format finished - LOL

And I just made all new text recip tables for about 10 niches...|cry|

Lemmy 2008-08-03 10:16 PM

I'm not about to change my rules pages quite yet, but anyone who already submits to my sites and gets accepted regularly won't have a problem with the new format.

papagmp 2008-08-03 11:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U (Post 413197)
42?? I've gone over both threads and come up with 30. I need a drink and maybe I can count better....|waves|

There's actually more - add Grennie's three and your two that I don't have content for and that makes - well, lets see.... 47. And there were a few in the other thread that liked the idea but never came out and said if they accept the new format or not. They should post in this thread :D

papagmp outlawfreeporn.com
Greenguy link-o-rama.com
Greenguy pornmovielinks.com
Greenguy chubbylinks.com
Greenguy oldergalslinks.com
Greenguy sexytoonlinks.com
LusciousDelight lusciousdelights.com
Fonz smilingpussylinks.com
Fonz teenspanker.com
SheepGuy youngsmut.com
annie cash creamysites.com
virgohippy erospornlinks.com
JustRobert legalteenlust.com
JustRobert erotictonaughty.com
japamor joyporn.net
Linkster linkforsex.com
TekAngel mreros.com/linklist
Maj. Stress theadultsearchengine.com
Maj. Stress passion-for-porn.com
redraven ravensbest.com
Emerald smutgremlins.com
bluemoney bluemom.com
bluebrit blue-candy.com
ponygirl liquisexxx.com
Ladydesigner sexysmutlinks.com
Ladydesigner click4sexfun.com
Licker4U best-wet-pussy.com
Licker4U girls-that-squirt.com
Licker4U hairy-pussy-links.com
pclit clitpass.com
Preacher thisdepravedworld.com
Preacher depravedpornsites.com
tigermom xlef.com
Cucumber jerkingresources.com
HC-Majick naughtyplace.com
HC-Majick unclethumper.com
hashbury slutylinks.com/links
hashbury freepornpicturez.com
Floyd floydsdirtypornlinks.com
Floyd freelinkxxx.com
hashbury nastyxlinks.com
grandmascrotum msnaughty.com
Tuna getfreexxx.com
Mr Exotic moviefuckfest.com
Star Man dickheadshit.com
bDok nymphotic.com
Surfn surfnsfreeadultlinks.com

and add Lemmy's for an even 50:
Lemmy quantumporn.com
Lemmy we-r-sex.com
Lemmy planetofporn.net

Maj. Stress 2008-08-04 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lemmy (Post 413199)
I'm not about to change my rules pages quite yet, but anyone who already submits to my sites and gets accepted regularly won't have a problem with the new format.

I'm not making any rules changes on my sites yet either (call me lazy). People who read the board will know what they can submit to me. ;)

dionizos 2008-08-04 07:51 AM

You can send your sites to my linklist|thumb

Star Man 2008-08-04 01:28 PM

Come on Tommy,don't be shy!:D

Useless 2008-08-04 01:58 PM

Two or three posters in this thread have referred to a "new format." What is this new format? |huh

Also, amongst the list of things trusted submitters are allowed to do that normal submitters are not, what are you excited about? Inquiring minds want to know.

And no - my posting in this thread should not be considered a reason to add my lists to your, um, list. There are a few things I take exception to.

Star Man 2008-08-04 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior (Post 413318)
Also, amongst the list of things trusted submitters are allowed to do that normal submitters are not, what are you excited about? Inquiring minds want to know.

For starters I can get into movies again and not have to get hit with a 80 dollar bandwidth bill.I can have a main page and do a 'bonus gallery' type thing along with my standard galleries.I'm hoping it will snap surfers out of that robot like 'click,click,click,next site,click' mode.Theres a bunch of other ideas I have but for now,this alone excites me.You didn't think I was doing back flips over a private whois did you?

LD 2008-08-04 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior (Post 413318)

Also, amongst the list of things trusted submitters are allowed to do that normal submitters are not, what are you excited about? Inquiring minds want to know.

I tend to think being able to use webmaster tools like flash and iframes will help overall sales. I think people are used to seeing them and without them sites look a little bare and surfers will click away to find something more exciting...this should help retain surfers longer. I read somewhere the longer a surfer stays on your site the more likely they are to whip out the credit card, and flash video clips will keep people on my site a little longer, i think.

I'm hoping the 4 ads per page will lead to more sales, too. I have to be careful with that one though as I have a tendency to build banner farms...I'm thinking I will probably try to use smaller button ads, and little text links, probably shit I should already be doing, but now I will be almost forced to do it if i'm gonna get 4 ads on a page.

The biggest thing for me though, is hosted galleries. Many (not all) sponsors have killer galleries, professionally designed and far better than anything I could come up with, plus it cuts building time in half or more. Greater quantity AND better quality...a win win, not mention the whole 2257 thing...and bandwidth...and...you get the picture.

Oh yeah, while excited isn't the right word, I am somewhat intrigued by...dare I say this...auto-submitting.

Twiceshy 2008-08-04 03:50 PM

you can also send sites to My Linklists :)

Useless 2008-08-04 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LusciousDelight (Post 413329)
The biggest thing for me though, is hosted galleries. Many (not all) sponsors have killer galleries, professionally designed and far better than anything I could come up with, plus it cuts building time in half or more. Greater quantity AND better quality...a win win, not mention the whole 2257 thing...and bandwidth...and...you get the picture.

Ah, so here's Free Site v1.5.1, but with mirrors. :D

Well, I don't need more submitters since I already have a queue that makes my bowels ache at night as if I'm getting DP'd, so I'm not going to jump on the bandwagon.

The only people my opinion should really matter to are those who already have submission accounts with me, so the rest of you can skip past this, or finish cooking your Ramen, or go screw something. The only reason I'm even posting is so that I won't get angry emails later when your sites get rejected months from now when I reach today's submissions in my queue.

Here goes:

Flash movies WHICH ARE HOSTED ON YOUR SERVER are fine. Do not embed sponsor hosted Flash movies. Your Flash movies may NOT be linked to anything when clicked, ie a paysite tour. You may use javascript to get past IE's two-click issue. (If you don't know what I'm talking about, you aren't ready to use Flash movies anyway.) I don't care if you have full player controls or just a play button.

I will, of course, accept MovieRoom ;) Flash banners. I use them and I deem them trustworthy.

Counters? No, you silly newbie. Just because I trust you doesn't mean I trust SexTracker and friends.

Free/Sponsor hosting. No. Of course, I assume a couple of you use sponsor hosting anyway, but the ones I suspect have been submitting quality movie sites for a long time, so I'm not digging any deeper. But as a rule, no.

Hotlinking? LOL Oh, you people make me laugh and laugh.

iframes? Depends on the ad and the sponsor and the submitter.

Sponsor hosted galleries? If you submit a free site which consists of an index page, a main page, and two hosted galleries, it will be the last free site you ever submit to me, you lazy newbie slob. (I say that with love in my heart) If you do something simple and common like link to a hosted gallery as a bonus gallery, that's fine. Why would I care?

Maximum ads? I'm not a link counter. Presentation and navigability are what I'm looking for, not the number of links out. If you submit an original work of art/free site with quality clips that give me a giggle, inspire me, or remind my cock what porn is good for, I don't care if you link to your sponsor eighty times on that page, assuming it doesn't look like poo.

Autosubmitters: I'm still against them, but I'm not going to act like I can stop you. There are a couple of you who consistently have line breaks after at the end of your descriptions. If you aren't using submission software, then you suck horribly at copying and pasting.

If there's something I forgot to mention which you are curious about, ask here or PM me.





If you're reading this and wondering which lists I own so that you don't mistakenly submit your free hosted index and main pages linked to sponsor hosted galleries to me, don't worry - you can't submit to me anyway. |thumb

Useless 2008-08-04 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Star Man (Post 413323)
Theres a bunch of other ideas I have but for now,this alone excites me.

I was excited about Free Site 1.5, but I didn't get that past the porn congress.

SheepGuy 2008-08-04 05:55 PM

The iframes are what I like, they pull like shit pulls stink, and give me checks every week that I would like to make into bigger checks.
I might experiment with the hosted galleries thing as well, the thought had never crossed my mind and it seems easy enough to do.
People who submit to me have partner accounts as well, and nobody with free hosting will get a PA from me, same goes for a hidden whois, but if you're a partner that means I trust you, if I see something I don't like I'll let you know.
And I'm not really jumping on a bandwagon, I've always allowed a lot of leeway to those who submit to me.

Greenguy 2008-08-04 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior (Post 413346)
I was excited about Free Site 1.5, but I didn't get that past the porn congress.

No matter what you say, that's still a Hub when you go to 2.0 :)

BTW - you do make a lot of GREAT points, some of which I have not thought about (like my old friends at Sextracker) so I may need to fine-tune my rules to have a couple of exceptions.

Maj. Stress 2008-08-04 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie (Post 413372)
No matter what you say, that's still a Hub when you go to 2.0 :)

BTW - you do make a lot of GREAT points, some of which I have not thought about (like my old friends at Sextracker) so I may need to fine-tune my rules to have a couple of exceptions.

I don't understand the free email rule myself. If you had a valid email before why would you have a need for a free one now?

And for those of you that like hosted movies and banners, please make sure they are reliable. I've already declined a few sites because of loading issues. It might be a good idea to randomly check hosted banners and galleries for a few days before you start using them to make sure they are reliable. It is really not worth going through the effort of building and submitting a site to have a linkchecker remove it because the page no longer works.

Maya 2008-09-28 07:13 AM

Since I finally got around to asking Greenie for this trusted submitter status, I'll probably be testing this new type of submits myself very soon :)

So I will of course accept sites submitted by trusted LOR submitters following the new rules, at ErotiCult as well.

LD 2008-09-28 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maj. Stress (Post 413378)
I don't understand the free email rule myself. If you had a valid email before why would you have a need for a free one now?

And for those of you that like hosted movies and banners, please make sure they are reliable. I've already declined a few sites because of loading issues.

Yeah, I've had that problem...also, someone pointed out to me that those hosted embedded type videos usually count as a link since most of them link back to the sponsor. I ended up with 7+ outgoing links on a couple of my site galleries, until someone was kind enough to tell me to "cut that shit out, dammit..." :D

SimonT 2008-10-16 04:20 PM

My rules got updated back in August and apart from the free email address they are inline with LOR rules.

webpornlinks.com
pornuwant.com
triplexsmut.com
bangaroo.com


Simon


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc