I just applied for a submission account, looking forward to submitting

G

that part of the site is for gallery submitters only that want accounts

I seen you gave free sites for examples...

free site submitters need no account and submitt here http://www.pornoplentyxxxlinks.com/submit.htm

I checked out your whois and your info is kinda flaky, like your name is a city and state and I cant tell where your hosted at

I would straighten out that info first cause I cant list you with that info

Hi Plateman

What is wrong here :

http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...ian-slut/free/
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...y-chicks/free/
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...s-teases/free/
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...nde-wife/free/
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...-handjob/free/
http://www.xxxgalleriesweb.com/frees...-balloon/free/

I would like to know why my free sites are not listed ?
Please tell me if I do something wrong ...

Thank you !!!

they all look the same, plus the biggest thing that i saw when looking them up in my admin was that you used LL's urls in the site url's

thats a instant ban on my LL and i didnt see the examples you posted here, cause they were prolly blocked

Dear Mr. Plateman
 

May I ask you something - how did you decide that "They all look the same" ? And furthermore another one for you (hope it is simple enough to answer me): "Do you have hair (I hope you are not bald) ? How about arms and legs ? Head (perhaps with brain in it) ? Generally speaking you are as much human as me - HOWEVER THIS DOES NOT MAKE US NEITHER EQUALL NOR TWINS IN APPEARANCE - and thank God for that...



You think that I'm some kind of joke for you as well as my work and it appears that you deliberately trying to underestimate and ruin all my work. Better think of some other reason (more substantial one) than giving me a child-like excuses, without pointing out the real reason. You can say "I don't like your free sites" and it will be clear enough for me to understand your way of thinking toward my work. Just, please DON'T tell me that they "They ALL look the same"

I'll try to explain again for you (listen carefully): THE STRUCTURE OF THESE FREE SITES IS THE SAME !

Is this clear enough for you ? Or shall I repeat myself once again ?

I'm not spending all my time looking into every tiny details to make them different one from another - I'm trying my best and at the end all I got from you is "They all look the same" - complete nonsense (all the way)

Regarding the LL's urls in the sites url's, Green Gay told me that this is a problem, therefore I didn't post them here and as you can see (you do have eyes don't you ?) they are no longer in my url's...I just don't put them any more... So, please stop playing Sherlock Holmes role and announce your greatest discovery (so far), because you haven't discovered the hot water again... Bravo (applause from the audience) You are the Man ! An old saying says: "You can't pleased them all" and there will always be people like you around - annoying...

And frankly speaking (or honestly) I don't give a rat's ass whether you are going to list me or not from now on... I've just lost interest...

And believe me - there are plenty of good link lists available which list me regularly and appreciate my work, but I may be everything else except cheater and I'm diligent in what I do, so to please you (link lists owners) and last but not least to have the opportunity to be listed...

If you were only saying as a reason the url's things I would have understand, but to point out "They all look the same" is (to put it gently) a pile of manure... And one friendly advise - go check your vision and if needed (strongly recommend this) buy yourself a pair of nice shiny glasses (Sherlock Holmes type)

Be well and God bless you, because you are pathetic...|crazy|

I am not trying to ruin your work or your name, from a reviewers POV the index of those sites do look the same, and that's the page that gets looked at the most

and as far as the url's go, you asked why you were not getting listed and I told you the truth, you got banned for it, if you didnt pop off like a asshole I would have unbanned you and you could of got listed

WOW Mister Noble ...

"if you didnt pop off like a asshole I would have unbanned you and you could of got listed"

...I don't give a rat's ass whether you are going to list me or not from now on... I've just lost interest...


END of discussion ...

Got a rejection email for a FS - no reason stated though.
http://wantonporn.com/fs/milf-mature...-american-mom/

I emailed back - no response - so trying here. I am curious as to why, since the same FS was accepted by pretty much anywhere it's been reviewed so far.

hi tigermom sorry but milf riders has excessive consoles on the tour, it's been known that plat bucks has some overly aggressive consoles on there links

Weird, I'll look into that. I always go for the no consoles links in freesites - I'll check to see if I got the wrong code there.

Fixed - I'll re-submit and sorry about that :)

You Stated

Georgia Jones
http://www.larrys-babes.com/Georgia_...ia_Jones-fs/2/
babes

was rejected

Reason:
sorry nothing opening up in new windows

Can you explain this ?
Thanks Larry

your 2257 link opens in a new window, also I just now went through the site and your galleries both have different background colors on them

I did not see this site listed:
http://luvtranny.com/mkbank/fucking-a-tranny/

Any problems?

it's coming today sometime tek I got behind a few weeks ago, am just about caught up|waves|

OK, sounds good. :)

Your submission:

Pizza Slut
http://www.btuz.com/ms/pizzaslut/m3/index.html
hardcore


Has been rejected and it will not be listed.
If you want to fix it, just resubmit it right after its done, just put
in the description thats its a 2nd submit.

no reason in email..

you might think i am off my rocker but i think the pizza logo infringes on there logo which is trademarked

if someone else can give there input on the matter, and say I'am nuts|crazy| I'll list it, i do like the site, but not the niche, which can get old real fast

Just an FYI, about 9 years ago I had an over zealous webmaster working for me that stuffed keywords in the meta keywords. One of the ones that he used was the Pizza Hut of Porn. We got a threatening letter from their lawyers about this. In this instance with your submitter, I think that if Pizza Hut is still inclined to go after folks that fuck with their branding, they'd go after the free site and not your Link List. Just an fyi and my opinion.

CJS

i created that logo from scratch, not like i copied and pasted it.. they cannot chase everyone that has something similar. besides they have a green dot on the letter "I" that left out ;)

This is actually the first LL that has rejected it out of the almost 140 i submitted to!

ok I'll get it in there on the next review, no need to resub|waves|

http://www.twistedtease.com/index.ph...products_id=72 |thumb

It's parody, so he should be safe from legal repercussions.

Actually it appears pizza slut is copyrighted from that twistedtease site

Do you send accept/reject e-mails and how long to get reviewed?

I still got a bunch of your sites listed|thumb

I do send accept emails and reject on some, right now I am about 10 days behind, but I review almost everyday

Hi I got rejected and I have no clue what to fix
Blonde Haired Cutie
http://www.tnadaisy.com/hus/aai/b/index.html

No blind linking Key word recips or recips with broken links Allowed

dan - look more closely at your recip table...

what wazza said, I was gonna list it, I'll give submitters 1 keyword recip - only if it's not out of hand, what made me reject it was that eye killing red site map links

but I did list some of your other sites :)

plus I dont read the board like a whore so I dont know a lot of the newer submitters......

a heads up if you never submitted before or I dont know you, at the end of the description put what board your from....

A Lot of fuckin people (through the years) that built good sites and you as a LL owner thought they would stay in this biz would let there domains go 404 or there host would put up a link filled page and I even found some using surfer traps, and that really pisses me of

I only want serious submitters and you dont have to submitt every day, just build good looking sites, and dont give in to the traffic leaching LL that make you use those Shit recips, most are auto submitting and are not editing the keyword recips

I know GG and me hate those recips and a few others, it fucking pisses us LL owners off

I feel like I'm in 1999 in this thread.

Im just passing by and reading through this thread. LL owners are keeping it old skool. Its like its own microcosm within a microcosm. It like being a Black Gay Jew in Saudi Arabia.

Im just reminiscing about the times when I would get accepted after being rejecting time after time. Those were the days that Google would rank a free site high.

that never really happened to me to much, it was shitty imo to have LL and tgps have you submit for a while before they would list you

Can you tell me why my site was rejected http://www.dogzinatub.com/free/looka...ers/index.html it was accepted everywhere else and in your rejection email it does not give a reason.

dont know, just resub both

Well thats kinda a problem. Your script only allows one freesite a day so if I resubmit that one i cant submit the site im making for today.

Just this one, it got accepted everywhere else so far

cheers

rob

Your submission:

Mom On Mom
http://lesbiancougarsblog.com/freepo...mom/index.html
lesbian milf


Has been rejected and it will not be listed.
If you want to fix it, just resubmit it right after its done, just put in the description thats its a 2nd submit.

Reason:
Your site has layout problems or to hard to find site navigation or confusing.

He probably hit the wrong button :)

I consider it a pain in the bum too. You should make the graphics which say Gallery One, Gallery Two, etc. clickable. After not being able to click on Gallery One, I assumed you forgot to link to your galleries.

I would have rejected you for the second gallery. You shouldn't be advertising Sapphic Erotic and Cougars Crave Kittens on a gallery using Frankie Bank's content.

I bet you're happy that you don't submit to me. |smooch|

sound like a good idea, I will start making them clickable

There is a big fat frankie bank banner in the middle of the gallery

Things have changed quite a bit, but the general rule used to be that you weren't allowed to promote anything other than that particular paysite on a page using their content. I don't know how strict reviewers or paysite owners are about such things anymore.

Hey, is that site aimed toward mobile traffic or is it so thin purely for coolness of design?

I looked at frankie's terms after you mentioned it and it says as long as you have a link back to the site the content is from,

to be honest your the first person to mention it, I have always done that on my free sites i just kind of build it like i would a blog. the link to the pay site with a banner by the actual content and then a different banner above and below the post or in this case above and below the gallery, I think If a surfer hasn't clicked one banner they won't click the other two for the same pay site, so i might as well give the surfer a choice in the same niche. I remember reading about a "Money bar" at the bottom of gallery submits for tgps when i first got started in adult and the theory stuck with me. (I am trying to make a bit of money out of this at the end of the day ;) Although I make sure the content sponsors banner is in the middle of the content so it can't be missed, I want to make money from this but i don't want to screw the sponsor who supply the content)

I mostly build them about 750px wide and just thought i could fit everything into a nice slim table, (also knowing how ll owners always like a variety of site designs) i built about four templates like that one, don't know how it will take with surfers but i guess if those sites make a ton more sales than the wider style I would switch to more slim line, not sure how it would look on a mobile, never thought of that actually. I will have to see if the slim sites get more mobile traffic than the classic wider style templates


But I did heed your advice and made the "gallery 1, gallery 2" images clickable to the actual galleries, so thanks for the heads up on that one. |thumb