Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread II (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=43245)

Useless 2009-01-16 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crown333 (Post 437101)
Greenie,

Noted. Our statement about tone was with specific reference to the following, which was the first comment in Useless's initial post following his disclaimer. Plainly, that leadoff statement had absolutely nothing to do with compliance with your rules, and was made for another purpose:

I guess I shouldn't expect an answer... People like you make me rejoice that my lists are partner-only.

My disclaimer's intent was exactly as it was stated. I am not one of Greenie's employees. I didn't want you, or perhaps a member of your massive free site-building staff, to assume that I was one of his reviewers or think that my word was the final judgment on your free site. My tone may seem adversarial now because I've come to dislike you. But that is probably based on your inability to answer my simple question and repeated claims that my tone was anything but apathetic. At this very moment, I think you are giant douche bag. You may still win me over though. I am easily bribed.

No matter my tone, my employment status or the color of my eyes, your free site is a piece of shit and you are too fucking difficult to help.

crown333 2009-01-16 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior (Post 437096)
Do you say 'we' rather than 'I' in order to make it sound as if you are something more than you are, which is a person who can't produce a decent-looking free site?

Greenie,

There's your smoking gun, again. Useless has just confirmed our initial reaction regarding tone and agenda. We would rest our case about Useless' tone, but there appears to be more of this unproductive stuff to come. Should that occur, we may take off the gloves and respond to him with "just text" of our own.


Crown333

Useless 2009-01-16 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crown333 (Post 437107)
Greenie,

There's your smoking gun, again. Useless has just confirmed our initial reaction regarding tone and agenda. We would rest our case about Useless' tone, but there appears to be more of this unproductive stuff to come. Should that occur, we may take off the gloves and respond to him with "just text" of our own.

Crown333

What are you, a fucking child? I was the first one to answer your pathetic newbie question and you've done nothing but bitch about me since. I mean, what the fuck? Let me guess -- this is your second board persona and I've pissed you off in the past.

If you had any goddamn sense, you'd be spending your time refining your free site instead of attempting to battle with. If you're here to pick a battle with me, fine. I'm up for piss and drama.

If you have a bone to pick with me, start a bitch thread in the Chit Chat forum. This thread is not the place for your childishness.

crown333 2009-01-16 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior (Post 437105)
I guess I shouldn't expect an answer... People like you make me rejoice that my lists are partner-only.

My disclaimer's intent was exactly as it was stated. I am not one of Greenie's employees. I didn't want you, or perhaps a member of your massive free site-building staff, to assume that I was one of his reviewers or think that my word was the final judgment on your free site. My tone may seem adversarial now because I've come to dislike you. But that is probably based on your inability to answer my simple question and repeated claims that my tone was anything but apathetic. At this very moment, I think you are giant douche bag. You may still win me over though. I am easily bribed.

No matter my tone, my employment status or the color of my eyes, your free site is a piece of shit and you are too fucking difficult to help.

Useless,

Well several established link lists who listed our site disagree with you. So much for your keen insight and stellar "judgment".

Win you over????????? We're blowing you off, which is plainly more than you deserve. Your pathetic, clueless, gutter trash behavior speaks for itself, and we will not sully ourselves by dignifying it with anything but benign neglect. As far as we are concerned, you no longer exist.

To all others who graciously offered advice on our site, a hearty thanks.

Crown333

Licker4U 2009-01-16 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crown333 (Post 437109)
We're blowing you off, which is plainly more than you deserve.

You consistently say "we". Are you a duo? Trio? Quad? Or do you have MPD? (Multiple Personality Disorder)

crown333 2009-01-16 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Licker4U (Post 437113)
You consistently say "we". Are you a duo? Trio? Quad? Or do you have MPD? (Multiple Personality Disorder)


We literally means more than one person. Why is this an issue with you, or anyone?

Crown333

JackDaniel's 2009-01-16 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crown333 (Post 437117)
We literally means more than one person. Why is this an issue with you, or anyone?

|pokefun| All this drama reminds me of a movie that I saw a long time ago called "Me, Myself & Irene"

crown333 2009-01-16 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackDaniel's (Post 437126)
|pokefun| All this drama reminds me of a movie that I saw a long time ago called "Me, Myself & Irene"

We were not eager to come into this venue to get the reasons our site was rejected. That's this list's format, however, and so here we are.

From a distance, we've seen this kind of drama many times before, don't particularly like it, and attempt to avoid it. Sometimes, no matter how hard you try to avoid it by being civil, gracious, and appreciative, and no matter how many times you thank everyone for their comments, for reasons we will not attempt to mention, you just can't. So we will just embrace the the civil respondents and blow off the un-civil. Life will go on.

Crown333

SheepGuy 2009-01-16 11:24 PM

We are Borg

Greenguy 2009-01-17 03:58 PM

Crown333 - I really do hate to stereotype people, but based on your site & your posts, I truly do not think that I or anyone else on this board can help you with anything. YOU turned this thread into what it's become, not Useless. I ask that you take me off your submit list & have a nice life.

Hotmodeltease 2009-01-21 11:34 AM

Just Curious
 
Hi Guys

I first would like to say how much fun I'm having in my first month of posting free sites. The learning curve is large and at times taxing, but trudge on I shall.

I was wondering why my mature site www.hotmodeltease.com/fsan4/ was rejected.

Please clarify so that the mistake will not be repeated.
Thank you
Hotmodeltease

MrMaryLou 2009-01-21 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hotmodeltease (Post 437651)
Hi Guys

I first would like to say how much fun I'm having in my first month of posting free sites. The learning curve is large and at times taxing, but trudge on I shall.

I was wondering why my mature site www.hotmodeltease.com/fsan4/ was rejected.

Please clarify so that the mistake will not be repeated.
Thank you
Hotmodeltease

The blue text you are using on your recipt table is hard to read. It almost blends in with the background.

Hotmodeltease 2009-01-21 12:28 PM

Thanks for the quick reply
 
I did not like the way it looked either, and it should not happen again.

Thanks for your support
Hotmodeltease

NY Jester 2009-01-25 01:53 AM

Quote:

Site Name: Virgin Nubile Girl
Site URL: http://www.nubiles-girls.com/f/virgin-girl/
Category: TeenSoloGirls

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links
Sites showing as parked..that was quick.

secretagentwilly 2009-01-25 07:21 PM

Hey Greenie or MML, What category would you say this site fits into:

http://www.thepornindex.com/fs/up/bald/0941/1/1/

it's a bald chick....I'm looking for fetish or interracial...please advise.

Thank you in advance.

Greenguy 2009-01-26 09:47 AM

easymama - we'd list it in unusual or interracial, but I do have "goth" on my list of categories to add.

Also - side note - that guy played Obama in the Nailin Palin movie by Hustler :D

secretagentwilly 2009-01-26 07:26 PM

Thanks greenie...I'll touch up the recip and submit...

shoosky 2009-01-26 08:23 PM

Trouble with submitting to link-o-rama
 
I've try submitting free sites to link-o-rama but they rejected my sites as reason Blind or Misleading Links.Can you check it out for me where the blind links is?Thanks.
http://www.hotlesbianlist.com/freesi..._Poolside_Duo/

MrMaryLou 2009-01-26 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shoosky (Post 438361)
I've try submitting free sites to link-o-rama but they rejected my sites as reason Blind or Misleading Links.Can you check it out for me where the blind links is?Thanks.
http://www.hotlesbianlist.com/freesi..._Poolside_Duo/

You recipt links to http://debauchery.com/ and http://www.sortlinks.com/ blind they should have the name of link list in them as you have with your others.

rblight 2009-01-30 08:58 AM

GG,

I use to get listed regularly by you but all of a sudden I get no email confirmations for submissions and I have zero traffic from old listings, which suggests to b=me that I might have have been blacklisted. The domain in question was 38dds.com. Could you check this and LMK. I never removed any links and the sites were never taken down so I don't know what the reason could have been. I have always loved Link-O-Rama. Here is a sample site that use to be listed but which no longer is.

http://www.38dds.com/stacked/

Useless 2009-01-30 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rblight (Post 438916)
GG,

I use to get listed regularly by you but all of a sudden I get no email confirmations for submissions and I have zero traffic from old listings, which suggests to b=me that I might have have been blacklisted. The domain in question was 38dds.com. Could you check this and LMK. I never removed any links and the sites were never taken down so I don't know what the reason could have been. I have always loved Link-O-Rama. Here is a sample site that use to be listed but which no longer is.

http://www.38dds.com/stacked/

http://bl.usefulscripts.com/blocked/
It may or may not have been LOR that blacklisted you. Appeal and see what happens.

NY Jester 2009-01-30 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rblight (Post 438916)
GG,

I use to get listed regularly by you but all of a sudden I get no email confirmations for submissions and I have zero traffic from old listings, which suggests to b=me that I might have have been blacklisted. The domain in question was 38dds.com. Could you check this and LMK. I never removed any links and the sites were never taken down so I don't know what the reason could have been. I have always loved Link-O-Rama. Here is a sample site that use to be listed but which no longer is.

http://www.38dds.com/stacked/

You've also got 8 outbound links on this page http://www.38dds.com/stacked/nurses/nurses.html Id say thats going against most LL rules as excessive.

rblight 2009-01-30 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior (Post 438923)
http://bl.usefulscripts.com/blocked/
It may or may not have been LOR that blacklisted you. Appeal and see what happens.

Interesting. I have had zero problems with this domain submitting to LLs, except for the problem with GG. I had another domain on that blacklist and appealed but heard nothing back, so I suspect appealing is useless. The reason some of my domains may appear on this list is because last summer I was in the hospital for a few months and as a result my hosting got canceled. The host destroyed my content and I had no backup at the time. As a result, thousands of pages were hopelessly lost forever. I lost every one of my link trades.

NOTE, however, that my current problem with Link-O-Rama has nothing to do with this. He was accepting and listing my sites when I got back online in September of last year. I recently moved and noticed that all the listings are gone. This is the only list where that has happened.

rblight 2009-01-30 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NY Jester (Post 438926)
You've also got 8 outbound links on this page http://www.38dds.com/stacked/nurses/nurses.html Id say thats going against most LL rules as excessive.

With all due respect, I rarely see the kind of maximums you are referring to, and I don't think I have ever seen a rule that says 15 is too many. In the Link-O-Rama rules, it says a minimum of five for non-partners, but there is no specific maximum limit stated.

NY Jester 2009-01-30 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rblight (Post 439033)
With all due respect, I rarely see the kind of maximums you are referring to, and I don't think I have ever seen a rule that says 15 is too many. In the Link-O-Rama rules, it says a minimum of five for non-partners, but there is no specific maximum limit stated.

But I do believe they want all the recip to other link lists on the index page. So no 15 is not too high a number just your placement seems a bit strange to me.

Useless 2009-01-31 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rblight (Post 439030)
NOTE, however, that my current problem with Link-O-Rama has nothing to do with this. He was accepting and listing my sites when I got back online in September of last year. I recently moved and noticed that all the listings are gone. This is the only list where that has happened.

The reason stated is 404s, so it probably does stem from the time that you lost those pages. You really should take a moment to appeal.

abatis 2009-01-31 11:45 AM

im just curious on this but if a domain was lost and the content was lost and the links where all lost....would it maybe be a better idea to get a new name and start over so you don't have to deal with this everywhere you try to get links?

-abatis

rblight 2009-01-31 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abatis (Post 439084)
im just curious on this but if a domain was lost and the content was lost and the links where all lost....would it maybe be a better idea to get a new name and start over so you don't have to deal with this everywhere you try to get links?

-abatis

Until now, I didn't even know that the domain was blacklisted. With the exception of GG and PB and a few others, I have had no problems getting listed anywhere. But unless I can get off the list, you are probably right.

I have heard it can be nearly impossible to win an appeal. If a LL operators wants to punish me for a bit of bad fortune, so be it. I am an honest webmaster and NEVER CHEAT. Their loss.

Greenguy 2009-02-01 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rblight (Post 439030)
...The reason some of my domains may appear on this list is because last summer I was in the hospital for a few months and as a result my hosting got canceled....

I remember seeing the appeal, but the date we/I blacklisted you was before last rummer (I think it was 2004 or 2005) I have a tendency to just delete any appeal that has an inaccurate time frame.

But you seem legit, so I'll remove it today - sorry for the hassle.

Greenguy 2009-02-01 10:20 AM

I might have to take that statement back - I have you in here 3 times for 3 different reasons:

rblight@38dds.com
Reason: redirecting after listing

rblight@38dds.com
Reason: Templates

38dds.com edit
Reason: 404


1 would be ok. 2 is iffy. 3 really does concern me, seeing as the 1st one is "inactive" meaning that we took you off the list once before.

rblight 2009-02-01 10:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenie (Post 439150)
I might have to take that statement back - I have you in here 3 times for 3 different reasons:

rblight@38dds.com
Reason: redirecting after listing

rblight@38dds.com
Reason: Templates

38dds.com edit
Reason: 404


1 would be ok. 2 is iffy. 3 really does concern me, seeing as the 1st one is "inactive" meaning that we took you off the list once before.

The redirects were due to losing all my site files when I was in the hospital. The 404s. The templates is probably legit and is likely the current reason. I use different templates but not enough I guess. I recall you saying something about not wanting the same template submitted more than once per month.

I thought that one reason might have been that the email address I used to submit the sites in September and October of last year is no longer valid. I have since moved.

Also, I have owned this domain for over 10 years and outside of the rash of submissions made in September and october, I had not submitted a site to your LL probably since 2002 or so. There have been a few times where my server was down for 24 hours so maybe your spider couldn't find a recip.

If I was a scammer, I would not be submitting sites on a domain that was blacklisted and would probably be going through a proxy, neither of which i would ever do, which hopefully will tell you something about me. But I understand that trust is a difficult thing to earn in this business and I guess you really don't know me from adam.

Greenguy 2009-02-02 10:48 AM

Fine! :) I'll take you off there today.

Sodo 2009-02-03 04:45 PM

Rejected due to blind links - question
 
Hi Greenie,

My new site:
http://www.sexat21.com/teensexisbetter/

was rejected due to blind or misleading links - is it due to the way I promote the free memberships offered by the sponsor, or what is the reason - please advice so I can change my ways, need to know what is going wrong but don't want to fix things in the blind :o)

Thanks in advance
Sodo

JackDaniel's 2009-02-03 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sodo (Post 439463)
Hi Greenie,

My new site:
http://www.sexat21.com/teensexisbetter/

was rejected due to blind or misleading links - is it due to the way I promote the free memberships offered by the sponsor, or what is the reason - please advice so I can change my ways, need to know what is going wrong but don't want to fix things in the blind :o)

Thanks in advance
Sodo

Your link to http://onlybestsex.com/ is a blind link it should have the name of the link list in it.

Sodo 2009-02-03 05:03 PM

Hi JD,

Thanks for pointing that out, I just took for granted that what they put in their recip table was what was supposed to be there, I think I'll just get rid of them and put someone else in!

are you a link-o-rama representitive...just wondering since you answered that fast!

Kind regards
Sodo

Sodo 2009-02-03 05:10 PM

Is that the only thing wrong?

Kind regards
Sodo

MrMaryLou 2009-02-03 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sodo (Post 439463)
Hi Greenie,

My new site:
http://www.sexat21.com/teensexisbetter/

was rejected due to blind or misleading links - is it due to the way I promote the free memberships offered by the sponsor, or what is the reason - please advice so I can change my ways, need to know what is going wrong but don't want to fix things in the blind :o)

Thanks in advance
Sodo

That was the only thing wrong Sodo :)

Sodo 2009-02-03 05:15 PM

I was afraid it was worse than that, thanks a bunch MrMaryLou :)

I can safely let the sponsor links stay then :)

Will correct it asap and re-submit, I hate when I get rejected and have to wait 24 hours, will keep an eye on those out of the box recips :)

I'm happy :)
Kind regards
Sodo

james-st 2009-02-06 08:14 AM

Your submission:
Site Name: Ebony Lesbians Play Nice
Site URL: http://newsexyone.com/LICK200/
Category: LesbianMovies

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Missing Images or Movies

Maybe some image is not showing
I re-uploaded everything
Cheers

Mateusz 2009-02-06 08:28 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Seems its a problem with your server/host

When I clicked for the fist time on the one of the movies I got this 503 error - 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

The movie loaded fine when I clicked again

Thought I'm not LOR reviewer


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc