Your link to http://www.virexy-porn.com/ is blind it must contain the name of the link list.

Ok, I wonder why the owner of that link list has not thought about that. Anyway, good to know. Thanks

Are links to debauchery and onlybestsex blind?

http://www.selectedgirls.com/free/pi...nette-melissa/


Is there on board some topic where is list of link lists with ok links (non blind)?

Yes they are both blind links and must have the name of the link list in them here is a thread with more information http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=44552

Having trouble identifying blind links
 

Site URL: http://www.toosxxx4.com/

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links


This is my second attempt to submit the site and, while I have plenty of experience with web technology, I am new at creating adult sites. After the first rejection I just tried to clarify where my links went and resubmitted.

At this point I am not sure which links are causing the problem and would like to ask you to point out an example or so of a problematic link on my site so I can start to understand and, hopefully, address the problem.

Thanks for running this forum.

Made another site and submited today, got the same blind link rejection, I did add the name Virexy porn to the recip this time though.

http://www.milfsexmovies.com/freesit...rate-milf-sex/

Hi - this site was rejected for blind links, I've altered the recips, but was wondering if there are more blind links on other pages:

http://www.freesexpornlinks.com/teen...nis/index.html

Sorry it was for movies under a 120 seconds you got two galleries 4 movies each they play for 11 seconds each so thats a total of 88 seconds and you need a total of 120 second between the two galleries.

If you feel you have made the corrections please resubmit.

have done - thanks MML

Sorry I saw my mistake and fixed it so disregard this please. I will resubmit it.
Thanks


Hi,

http://www.freebiguys.com/grannies/facial/

Rejected, reason:
Site Structure Violation

I don't see the violation.

Thanks!

Another question - is a resubmit classed as a submit for the 24 hour period?

I don't know how you got 11 on each, I have opened every video and they all have 15, I wouldn't have submitted if I didn't know the videos were 120 sec. Oh well, I'll try to get longer vids anyway....

Your submission:
Site Name: Heels Stockings Suspenders
Site URL: http://www.stockingsathome.com/lady-...ree/index.html
Category: Lingerie

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Site Structure Violation

I read through the reasons but the list goes on and on ;)

Any feed back would be useful thanks :)

I see that you've resubmitted it since you posted, so I'm not sure if you made corrections. But I can say that anytime we see a button that's not part of a form, we consider it a blind link since it can go anyplace.

You also might want to poke around some link lists & look at other people's free sites - all your pages are different colors & your title - TooSxxx 4 webgirls next door site ! - is kinda odd.

I'm not 100% sure what my reviewer saw as the site itself looks fine. The title is a little off (only 4 facial pics) and there is one pic out of order (17 & 18 should be swapped) and maybe those 2 things caused him to select that rejection treason (since there are rejection reasons for each of those)

Yes, there are a lot of things that can fall into this rejection reason, but the one you missed is "Take a look at your font colors..." The PenisBot recip is unreadable.

What he saw was the pictures on both galleries were the same which is what I fixed, will do the two pictures also. |loony| Thanks!

For http://www.toosxxx4.com/:

As sort of suggested by Nickname I fixed a recip that didn't clearly name it's link list before resubmitting.

There are only two buttons on the site AFAIK. They are on the entry/index page. They lead exactly where they say they lead - the top one to a search engine (yahoo/google/aol) and the bottom one into the site. I can replace these with anchor links if you still feel their removal is important.

The title was an attempt at a softcore title for a softcore site. I am open to suggestion if the current title or something like "TooSxxx 4 Indie Webmistresses" are still viewed as needing improvement.

The site may look a bit different from other free sites as I attempted to apply some newer technology, including galleries that play slide/strip shows while still serving their required role as places to download pictures. Like other free sites I still offer POTD, banners and galleries. I have not posted to "Newbies" yet but will be happy to do so if comments reacting to my galleries etc. are deemed too off topic.

Like I said, we consider it a blind link since it can go anyplace.

It's an odd title. I'm not saying you can't use it, but it's an odd title. And they are not necessarily webmistresses.

Let me ask: do you plan on adding to this site? more galleries of amateur girls? things along the line sof the potd? If so, this is not the type of free site that I'd list. I don't mind the slide/strip show thing, but it does not have the feel of a free site, as far as link lists go, to me.

Your question suggests a solution to me. I could break up the home page that covers multiple models/webmistresses into separate pages for each one, with either extended URLs of the form www.toosxxx4.com/audrey/ or subdomains like furrygirl.toosxxx4.com. There would now be new entry pages (with no buttons and new titles) for each model and one home page for each with pictures, banners, and links to the galleries making it more like most free sites. The only catch I can think of is that I might need to resubmit these "new" sites to my recip link lists and see what they say about it.

Thanks again for taking the time to look the site and postings.

That's pretty much how everyone does it :)

Use the root of the domain as a hub & then build small free sites that focus on one girl & submit them individually.

My freesite was rejected:
http://www.bbwoasis.com/freesites/bb..._plump_chicks/

Reason:
Blind or Misleading Links

Could you let me know which textlinks you consider as blinds?
Thanks.

It's not a text link it's the banner in gallery 3 that looks like a thumb if you want to unlink it from the sponsor and just have it link to the text that would be better.

True, that banner looks indeed like a thumb.

Yesterday, I didn't get my submission confirmation so I tried to submit once again - still didnt get it. Today I realized why.. one of my domain is blacklisted at UsefulScripts - reason: bad domain for se.
As far as I know, out of sites I'm currently submitting to, only LOR (besides smut gremlins where site was already accepted) is using US, so if it was one of you who blacklisted the domain I'd like to know what exactly did you mean ?

|couch|

The domain I'm speaking of is:
for-women-porn.com

Its been taken off :)