It worked for me. I also believe the width is within range, 800 pixels. I have other sites listed that are wider and longer. Not trying to argue. I just want to make sure my sites comply with the rules. I hadn't had one rejected in a long time and have used this template before with success.

Well the enter link dont work and its sill wide in IE 8 :(

What is the problem with the enter link?

And what does the site look like on IE? I am on a mac with no IE.

Drop the javascript and use a simple href tag instead. The enter link scripting is not working at all with IE 8, and there is no reason to use javascript on a free site anyway.
It's scrolling almost 2000 pixels wide. The reason is simple: your HTML coding sucks. Honestly, it's a mess. Missing multiple

I use Crossover on my Mac to run IE 6 just for checking my stuff.

IE is really picky about tables and other little things that other browsers can deal with.

You really need to find a way to check your stuff in IE since so many users use it.

If all else fails, an html validator usually does the trick. :D

You're right. I honestly don't know how the code got so mangled. I always close tags properly. I do a lot of cutting and pasting when altering a template so perhaps I need to pay more attention in the future. In both Firefox and Safari, the layout is exactly as I had intended it to be so there wasn't much reason to check code. I wish IE didn't stop putting out a Mac version.

You are also right about the java script and the enter button. Sometimes I like to add in a few fancy things but that's probably not a good idea on a free site where the object os to get the surfer to click on a sponsors' like, hopefully buy something, and not come back. Thanks for taking the time to point all this out.

Hello Jim,
Unbelievably! I have placed Recip Links in the best place!
Your robot no good?

Sunday, January 10, 2010, 4:20:13 PM, you wrote:

Your submission:
Site Name: Russian Celebrity Hardcore Actions
Site URL: http://www.redlinechannel.com/cel/
Category: Celebs

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:Not Enough Recip Links
???????????????????????????????????????????????

You might want to read the rules http://www.link-o-rama.com/greenguy/therules.htm also see rule #10 as well.

2 MrMaryLou - REASON : Not Enough Recip Links. its rule #2

He's saying that you should also look at Rule 10:
10 - Sites with poor grammar or broken English will not be listed

I'd have rejected it for #10 as soon as I read the title.

I've corrected all mistakes. Could U approve my site?

If you feel you have made the corrections please resubmit.

The SexTracker code is a mess. I see the code on the index and no enter link when viewed in Firefox.

Rejected
 

Hi

I submitted my free site www.milfhall.com and was rejected.

reason - That's Not A Link List Free Site

I am not quite sure in which context to read that?|kissass

tadpole90 - I'm not sure what kind of site you have there, but it's not the type of site that I list.

From my rules page:
1 - I only list Free Sites (warning page leads to main page leads to gallery pages) No galleries, no pay sites, no avs sites, no tube sites, etc.

Hello!
My freesite http://latinapussyvideo.com/tight-brenda/1/ has been rejected with the following reason:Blind or Misleading Links - Including Recips

The problem is that I can not find out the misleading or blind link.
Could anybody help me?
Thanks in advance!

Your link to http://www.livesexlinker.com/ is a blind link.

What blind link?
 

Hi.
I got my site Lucky Bastard Fucks Two Teens rejected due to "Blind or Misleading Links - Including Recips". Could you
please specify which is the blind link?
Thanks.

Your link to http://www.hqseek.com/ is blind it must contain the name on the link list.

hello GreenGuy!
i received some sets from a sponsor with [most\ 20 pics... is it cool if on a free i put those 20 pictures plus 4 extra from upcoming free site [like what's arriving shortly?] and then the same with next one etc. etc.

another question is can i make a free site with two different girls? i will ask for more pics/content next time, but i hoped to use what i've got:
> 4 sets with different lesbians (16 pics each - could use two per one free site),
> 6 sets with different solo girls (each one 20 pics),
> 3 different sets with one chick (each 16 pics - could make that into 2 free sites)

all of this content is not fhg's or free content available to webmasters, got it by request and it's from new updates. is it possible to utilize it somehow with 24 pics rule?

I recommend for the current site you use two sets from the sponsor one for each gallery using 12 from each set. Just like you talking about.

Hello everyone.
I've submitted a FS (Site URL: http://latinapussyvideo.com/virginoff/1/) to link-o-rama.com but it has been rejected
with the following reason:
Site Structure Violation.
The thing is that a FS structure looks the same as of my other freesites.
Any help?

The font you are using in the receipt table is unreadable.

Hey guy's I think Greenie's server and mine are not on speaking terms as my subs keep timing out. Could you please review this site here and list if it's okay? Thanks

Title: Hot Mature Blonde

URL: http://www.sultrymilf.com/sandy/sandyfs01/index.htm

Description: Busty mature babe exposed in her best lingerie

Your site was added :)

Many thanks MML!

Hosting is questionable?
 

I have a VPS with hostgator. I use private registration because I don't want some psycho stalker to follow my who-is info and kill my family in their sleep.

The nameservers go to my development domain at driaconsulting.com. If need be, you can email me at info@ driaconsulting.com for proof that it is my server:)

--------------------
Your submission:
Site Name: Demamma.Com Pregnant Fetish Blog
Site URL: http://demamma.com/
Category: Pregnant

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
Hosting Is Questionable
--------------------

Private whois is the problem.

Ok, thanks you for your answer. I don't feel right about showing the world my personal & home information, so I guess getting listed here won't happen. I thank you for taking the time to review my site anyway.

Anyone who has been doing this for a decade without hassle will tell you that's a nonsense excuse. It's really a non-issue.



(The real problem with open and honest whois info is when you decide to leave this world behind, prospective employers can search for your name and discover all the naughtiness you've been up to due to archived whois sites. The rotten, worthless cocksuckers. |banghead|)

I respect your opinion, but I hardly consider not showing my private info to the world is nonsense. If it is truly needed, a simple subpeona can get the organization my info. I list my contact info on my development website and my paying customers get my cell phone number. However, my porn site visitors and link trade partners needing my home contact info is just people being nosey. There is no reason why any of you would need to call me or mail me a letter:)

I found a couple of links I thought you should read:

http://www.networksolutions.com/educ...-registration/

http://spamtrackers.eu/wiki/index.ph...identity_theft
^recently a case of this reported at digital point.

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/security/0,1...9117667,00.htm

http://www.domainmarvelous.com/featu...-registration/

It's very thoughtful of you to think of me, but I'm not a newbie, nor am I an idiot. Far from it.

Wow, you are very much on edge, Sir. That was intended for all who think it is safe to post their home info online, especially having children.

Not that this is any of my business, but you aren't going to find many people who want to deal with you in this day and age unless they can check up on you and have faith you are not a scammer, especially as you advance further and start offering things people have to pay for. There are too many shady things that go on on the web and you're the one asking for other people's business don't forget.

On top of that, social media networks have pretty much made any sense of privacy a thing of the past the second you move one step up from becoming a lurker. There's always a risk but and you should use safeguards but the risk is probably the same as using your credit card to pay your bills as long as you check out the sites you are dealing with from your end. People can really only get so much info from who is and it's the info you should want them to have if you are legit.

To cover your home address use a P.O Box or mailing service which you should be doing anyway for any type of business. I should have probably minded my own business but thought I'd help you out cause someone did me about this when I first started. I'm paying it forward |headbang|

Couldn't you just use the address of someone you don't like...you ex, your boss, etc..?

Now I get 'hosting questionable'?
 

Hi.
Yesterday I submitted my second site to Greenguy:
http://www.hqsexxxclips.com/free-sites/asianslut/

And it got rejected due to "hosting questionable". Which is strange, since my previous site in the same host was accepted:
http://www.hqsexxxclips.com/free-sites/lucky-bastard/

What's the problem?
Thanks.

The problem is the private whois.

I don't have private whois. I specifically rejected it when I signed up with my host.