Greenguy's Board - What are you going to do about this 2257 shit?

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)

- General Business Knowledge (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)

- - What are you going to do about this 2257 shit? (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=9718)

I think we have to be very careful about masturbation... any touching could be considered masturbation....

Quote:

Originally posted by 1freepornfinder
I think we have to be very careful about masturbation... any touching could be considered masturbation....

I agree...shake it more than 100 or so times and you are playing with it.

(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

-- Could mean about anything but tits IMO.

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

-- Could mean about anything but tits IMO.

If you've got pink you should have the ink. :D

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
(E)

lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;

-- Could mean about anything but tits IMO.

you're right .... it's not cut and dried at all.... :(

my understanding is that E is not part of 2257 - its only A through D, or did i missread it?

Quote:

Originally posted by security_man
my understanding is that E is not part of 2257 - its only A through D, or did i missread it?

No, you have it right. (E) is not included in 2257 regulations.

I'm sure I missed this somewhere, but I can't find the info on if this is retro active (ie: being secondary producer needs actual docs) or if it's new content added after the date this goes into effect.

I have a few reputable providers I've purchased from who flat out won't give me the docs I requested because it's too much work to go dig them out of the back room.

If the sites prior to the change are grandfathered, how would you document that?

I also haven't seen posts by anyone who owns toplists like nastyfriends as to what they will be doing. It seems too broad as to if an is called from another site (fpa or banner, button) if you are responsible. I agree text links are probably safest, but I'd love to know what the expectation is.

I know this thread is old.. I need to get up to speed if anyone has anymore info or could point me to a resouce that has this info.

|waves|

Rollergirl, that is one of the many things about these new "clarifications" that is not clear. It is really hard to figure out what the heck is going on... if anything.

Alex

Quote:

Originally posted by RawAlex
Linkster, so far with the exception of a very few, most of the people bringing up the subject are trying to sell tracking software or DRM type arrangements for content. There has been a ton of "the sky is falling" stuff.

Personally, I think the new "rule clarifications" are not that, but in fact new laws and amendments to laws, which, when taken to a court of law, will be thrown out because these new laws were not passed by the house, the senate, and signed by POTUS. While they can calify rules with these adminstrative orders, they cannot create new offences where none previously existed, nor can they create retroactive paperwork requirements for individuals and companies that were previously exempt.

A few will get nailed, but like Acacia, someone will take them to court and things will settle back down.

1 more reason for Americans to vote Bush and his bullies out of office.

Alex

I agree. Everyone should be dilligent, but these new regs are so burley that it is not likely they can be pushed through as is.

In a few months - you will have a chance to put this away for good by voting Bush out of office.