Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   General Business Knowledge (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   Review my free site! (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=10640)

xxxjay 2004-08-30 06:42 PM

Review my free site!
 
LOL - makes me feel like a newbie again. These are some free hosted sites we are trying to perfect for linklist owners to send traffic to.

Security man did most of it and I modified a few things. Is there anything that you would change?

http://free.ocxxx.com/sites/18i/interracial_sex/

plateman 2004-08-30 07:59 PM

There great looking jay, and I'll take as many as you got..

Greenguy 2004-08-30 08:18 PM

Let me 1st say that you know I love ya :)

1 - Too graphic intesne & "flashy" looking for my taste.

2 - You're already falling into "template" mode.

Ramster 2004-08-30 08:43 PM

A free site that should sell. Nice layout.

No need for 3 galleries. Especially with that many pics per gallery. A little too flashy and not needed.

Overall though, they do look good.

Cleo 2004-08-30 08:51 PM

I like the look of the site. Lots of real text which is good.

I agree that it only needs two galleries.

Thumbler 2004-08-30 09:26 PM

I always thought hardcore on the warning page was a big no no - but what do I know?

xxxjay 2004-08-30 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greenguy
Let me 1st say that you know I love ya :)

1 - Too graphic intesne & "flashy" looking for my taste.

2 - You're already falling into "template" mode.

I welcome the criticism! :) That's why I posted here - because this is where all of the linklist people hang out.

I agree that maybe the sites are a little graphic heavy, and yeah - the galleries might be everykill.

What about reducing each gallery to 15 pics?

plateman 2004-08-30 10:12 PM

A lot of FHS are without warning pages or there's hardcore on the index Its a LL or tgp site that should have a warning before the sites or galleries..

security_man 2004-08-30 10:24 PM

oh sure jay, place all the blame on me |jester|

the real question is, is there anyone out there that would not list it? acually - if we just did 2 galleries of 10 pics each would that be too little? All info is always welcome :D

ps Thumbler, most of them do have the hardcore censored on the index, i didnt do it on this one cuz those pics were so small - good point tho

tiny 2004-08-30 10:40 PM

I don't know if I should say this but the quality of your grabs isn't good. Alot of blurrie ones and jagged edges.
I say this because if your going to also use it for people to use and make their own galleries to post alot will get declined via TGP's and MPG's.
Screen grabs should come from AVI's to get the best and with the faded colors they don't look too good.
If you have it at digital format and captured them you first start out as BMP's then go from there with compression to jpegs.
Way too much over saturation also.Don't make the mistake that a flashy design gets folks off and since your just starting the sites do it right or you'll always fall into it looks ok.Hell I've spent to much time tweakin a AVI before capture and its no fun but it needs to be done.
I like the design though its a pet peve of mine with video I guess.
And if you capture it and it doesn't look good don't use it for ads stick it in the site .Just my two cents I guess

Useless 2004-08-30 11:08 PM

That is undeniably gorgeous and the text is great. As a builder, my only suggestions would be in reinforcement of what others have said. Knock it down to two galleries of 15 thumbs each.

Greenguy 2004-08-30 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by security_man
...the real question is, is there anyone out there that would not list it?...
My greedy side tells me that yes, I would list them - LOL :D

Blue_Spade 2004-08-30 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greenguy
My greedy side tells me that yes, I would list them - LOL :D
Long live the greed!

Fonz 2004-08-31 04:10 AM

The 2nd thumb on gallery 3 leads to a broken image.
I would reduce the amount of pictures/galleries too.

Other than that it looks great :)

xxxjay 2004-08-31 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Fonz
The 2nd thumb on gallery 3 leads to a broken image.
I would reduce the amount of pictures/galleries too.

Other than that it looks great :)

I agree - I think 3 galleries of 15 pics is a good layout. Thanks for everyones input.

How about the ads? Too much? Too little? Just right?

AcidMaX 2004-08-31 07:50 AM

They look good Jay. Let us know when they are live :)

Opti 2004-08-31 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by security_man
oh sure jay, place all the blame on me |jester|

the real question is, is there anyone out there that would not list it? acually - if we just did 2 galleries of 10 pics each would that be too little? All info is always welcome :D

ps Thumbler, most of them do have the hardcore censored on the index, i didnt do it on this one cuz those pics were so small - good point tho


I like it as it appears clickable for a surfer to me.. dont care about the extra gallery personally but think the more interested the surfer is to click about a free site the mroe chance they will be intersted enough to check out sponsor.

If you just want to know if it would be accepted or not... I reckon some reviewers i know would knock it back for this banner if it was a regular submission ;-)

http://free.ocxxx.com/sites/18i/inte...i_468x80_3.gif

xxxjay 2004-08-31 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Opti

If you just want to know if it would be accepted or not... I reckon some reviewers i know would knock it back for this banner if it was a regular submission ;-)

http://free.ocxxx.com/sites/18i/inte...i_468x80_3.gif

OK, here is where we stand:

1. On 90% of the sites the galleries have been knocked down to 15-16 pictures.

2. Personally, I like the 3 gallery thing. It makes it more like a site rather than two galleries with some superfluous pages IMO.

3. We are working on busting out another series of less template looking and less graphic intensive sites.

4. We are working on video sites. I think video converts better. I am having the videos embedded on html pages for these. I'd like to bounce that off some of your here.

If you are currently an occash beta tester, you can grab the new sites in the adtools by clicking on "free" in the table. If you are interested in getting in on the occash beta test and listing these sites email me jay@occash.com.

Thanks for everyone's from this boards. Your opinion is important to me.

AcidMaX 2004-08-31 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by xxxjay
OK, here is where we stand:

1. On 90% of the sites the galleries have been knocked down to 15-16 pictures.

2. Personally, I like the 3 gallery thing. It makes it more like a site rather than two galleries with some superfluous pages IMO.

3. We are working on busting out another series of less template looking and less graphic intensive sites.

4. We are working on video sites. I think video converts better. I am having the videos embedded on html pages for these. I'd like to bounce that off some of your here.

If you are currently an occash beta tester, you can grab the new sites in the adtools by clicking on "free" in the table. If you are interested in getting in on the occash beta test and listing these sites email me jay@occash.com.

Thanks for everyone's from this boards. Your opinion is important to me.

Cool nice to have an affiliate program that listens to their whiny webmasters :) I will make sure I get someone to start entering the freesites in smutlinks soon :)

-Andy

urb 2004-08-31 04:27 PM

Nice job security_man and Jay :)

Alphawolf 2004-08-31 04:45 PM

Nice colors and overall design, but as others mentioned a bit too much on the graphics.

Why such prominent ENTER EXIT buttons?

That let me ignore the blinking ad text at the bottom and head straight for that big ENTER button.

Graphics smaller and thumbs bigger?

Nice though. Puuuuurty colors. ;)

security_man 2004-08-31 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Alphawolf
Nice colors and overall design, but as others mentioned a bit too much on the graphics.

Why such prominent ENTER EXIT buttons?

That let me ignore the blinking ad text at the bottom and head straight for that big ENTER button.

Graphics smaller and thumbs bigger?

Nice though. Puuuuurty colors. ;)

lol i know i know... it drove me nuts doing that but on most of them i had a shitload of space to fill on the index page so i had to put giant enter and exit buttons... i also know alot of owners are real picky about them so i made sure there werent any problems ;)

this batch im woking on now should be much closer to regular free sites we are all used to seeing :)

Alphawolf 2004-08-31 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by security_man
l i also know alot of owners are real picky about them so i made sure there werent any problems ;)

No worries there. |thumb

Okie dokie...enough of this- you have that rejected site of mine early this AM that is fixed and waiting your approval kind sir!

xxxjay 2004-08-31 06:03 PM

Here's a few links to some of my favorite free sites that security man has built for us:

http://free.ocxxx.com/sites/tb/first_time_anal/
http://free.ocxxx.com/sites/tb/anal_hardcore/
http://free.ocxxx.com/sites/tb/anal_movie/
http://free.ocxxx.com/sites/tb/anal_sex/

Good, no? I think it's a big improvement.

digifan 2004-09-01 12:52 PM

These are very nice... but the big pics are a tad bit blurry to me.

Jel 2004-09-01 02:20 PM

Great job guys IMHO :D
Could those Enter/exit buttons be swapped in size for the join banner beneath them? As was mentioned earlier, my eyes were also drawn to those rather than the join text.
Those pics that were considered below par - how about some text stating they have been compressed etc. and in the pay site you get the full crystal clear goodies?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc