![]() |
I remember when Richard's Realm used to list almost all my galleries
The other week I got two or three declined for slow server and just figured that there must be router issues or something since I know my servers are always fast.
Just now I got declined Reason: "Too much on thumbs page." http://kinky-cleo.com/porn/secretari...bs/boobs.shtml Hmmm, like 15 thumbs and one ad… |
I saw a similar post like this today about RR I notice on the submit page they reject so many % regardless so maybe they just put anything or something close for the reasons.
|
If I was trying to be fussy (say I needed 100 galleries today, had 110 good ones), I could say that you have actually 4 links off the page - the banner , the click here, the link to:
http://personal-porn-of-cleo.com/xxx-secretary-sin.html and the link to: http://cleos-porn-links.com/adult-links/ Again, I don't think that would NORMALLY be an issue, but if a reason was needed to blow something off, that would be it. As a side note, I had a number of galleries rejected by Richards for slow server or unable to reach server when I know the boxes were up, which makes me think that one or more of the reviewers might be experiencing some issues with their ISP or routing. Alex |
Same here Cleo |sad|
Most recently I submitted 3 galleries in the same niche ( over the space of 10 days)...using the same compression on all of them. They listed the first two then rejected the third one because of "poor thumbs" which 4 other members of this board (submitted the same gallery) have posted. I just shake my head and wait til a new reviewer comes aboard there. |
I got same problem, last 4 galleries got declined at RR, reasons: too slow, Full-size images too large.
If there is a new reviewer it sure is a pain in the ass. And i don't think its worth anyways, because when you get listed 15 min. later your at the bottom of the page. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
After two rejections for "server too slow" I received a new rejection yesterday:
We do not list pages containing lolida/schoolgirl links or references. O.K. - nothing wrong with that (I would fully support it), except that it's a gallery advertising ATK (formerly Amateur & Teen Kingdom), who are rather tough on affiliates for following all VISA rules! So I make sure that none of my galleries or banners for ATK contain words like "Teen" or any other underage references! Where I use the word "Coed" (permitted by VISA) I even put in brackets '18-23 years' behind... Seems the reviewer's fantasies were tickled by something like "Girls in Uniform" - that could be a girl in a school uniform (dirty bugger you are!), but more likely a Nurse or a cheerleader... |
They picked up most of mine this week...
Are you sure you didn't have "young" or "girl" somewhere in your meta or alt tags? |
It loaded almost instantly for me, and I use satellite internet. :S
|
Quote:
But I think I figured now what the reviewer doesn't like: I combined on the last 2 galleries Richard's Realm's button with a recip for Youngerbabes.com (actually figured they're both rather larg-ish sites so they might like it...) - looks like the YoungerBabes recip is wrong for Richards! |
Guess I am lucky with them then... |bananna|
|
|
I think I have figured out when the picky reviewer works. I submit around them :D
|
Reason:
"We do not currently list your host." Its been like a year of listing on the same host and suddenly.... :) |
Funny - i was just talking to someone about this yesterday - I had my first gallery declined in 5 years two days ago for poor quality full size images - and thats images that weren't compressed or resized LOL - I was actually kinda worried about using the pics for a tgp submit due to their higher quality :) - ah well - cross another one off the list and move on
|
Just got declined again for server too slow. |banghead|
Guess it is time to take him off my submit list. :( Kind of sad he was my oldest TGP on my submit list. |
Has anyone asked Richard?
Sounds like he has new reviewers? DD |
I know he has a board but for the life of me I can't remember or find the url.
|
Cleo, I'm not sure if this is what you are looking for or not, but hopefully it will help.
http://www.adultwebmasters.co.uk/chat/ |
Quote:
|
Just made sure that their reasons are worth %$#%.
Got declined last night, in the morning resubmitted and its listed. |
Quote:
After looking at that board I now remember why I don't ever go there. Does anyone actually like the software that it uses? Kind of a threaded flat board… |
Most welcome.
~proud of the fact that one of my three remaining brain cells remembered where I'd see the link at~ :) |
Most of my stuff is now being listed by RR. I figured out when to submit :D
Don't ask...lol |
I just resubmitted and already got listed on the one that got declined yesterday so it does look like it is one moronic reviewer over there.
|
i went threw the same earlier this week. just resubmitted and they were all accepted.
|
Anyone know how to get in touch with Richard and show him this thread?
|
Quote:
|
They don't even bother to send me an email saying my galleries are not approved. Don't know if they have me in some sort of black list or what.
Bert |
oh shit, as I remember, I never had luck with RR ... my galleries were allways rejected, and than my host was blacklisted couse they were thinking it's a freehost (DNS: xxxhosting4free.com).. after I managed to explain that I'm not on a freehost.. my galleries never got listed again... no emails, no explanation, no answers to my emails.. no nothing! ... guess, it's time to try my luck again! ...
saL |
Quote:
|
HI Cleo
I help out on Richards-Realm. I know when I see your name, I approve. I can look into this and see who and why you are being denied, because. I don't think those reasons are good enough. I know there's like 5 other reviewers also. Surfn, same for you. I know you submit quality gallerys. |
Quote:
Thanks Bert |
You got it Bert.
|
Quote:
|
Thanks Bump :)
I know it's only one reviewer and as you know working there you don't keep regular hours, it's been a hassle finding out when he "didn't" get a chance to see my subs. The person is probably the one brought in/over to replace MML if that helps? That's when this began for me. Unless you replaced him then I'm totally clueless. lol |
no prob. I didnt replace MML. In fact, I thought he was still a reviewer at RR
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc