![]() |
Filthy Earl's Filthy Fucking Rejections Thread
Assuming I don't fuck up my script doing this, Earl will be sending out rejection notices. If you receive a rejection email or are wondering why asshole Earl isn't listing you, this is the place to bitch about it.
Don't fucking email me! |thumb |
Who?
|
I heard he sold his list |huh
|
Earl is definately a sell-out, but he didn't sell anything (other than sperm, some plasma, and his soul).
|
Pre-rejection question: will yours personally - and a general opinion on the majority, if you have one - list a "TGP" that pulls it's thumbs from Remote Thumbs?
|
Earl doesn't have an "Other Lists" category. If he did, I don't think he'd really care. I've used Remote Thumbs myself in the past, so I have no reservations about them.
|
Thanks, UW. |bananna|
I'm conducting an experiment. It's called "How Much Can I Learn About Scripts Before My Head Explodes?" It was touch-and-go yesterday, but the programmer helping me and I both made it out with most of our brain cells intact. |thumb |
Hi!
Today I have received a decline from the Filthy Earls for site http://www.insiderlinks.com/ll/annem...ing/index.html with comments: Blind links. I think problem in the main.html - there are "Main Site" link which lead to the sponsor. If ratiocinate, "Main Site" link located on the the main.html page can lead to the main.html or to the sponsor main page, because on a "legend" for user, free site is a free preview for the sponsor main page. If on the gallery pages "Main Site" or "main Page" link will lead to the sponsor - this is a blind link because the main page for galleries is main.html. I think so. Or I am not right? |
"Main Site" link on your main.html is blind.
|
Quote:
If you decide to change that link, resubmit it and I'll list the site. By the way, welcome to Greenguy and Jim. This is a great place to hang with your fellow free site submitters and link list owners. |
Thanks Useless Warrior! Now all is clear.
|
What if the link said "Click here to Enter my Main sponsors paysite called
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It would be my pleasure ;)
|slice Oops! Wrong thwacker. |
Quote:
|
hi there,
what about this site who was rejected http://jakeslinks.com/teenslut10/ thanks for your time |santa| |
"start downloading" Blinder than Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles together.
Alex |
Yup, it's a combination of blind links and "This sweet young teen". I don't like to see the word 'young' on a teen site. You may resubmit it if you make some changes.
|
You know, with the amount of sites that I've been declining in the last two days while attempting to regain control over my backed-up queue, I'm sort of hurt/surprised that only one person has bothered to ask why their site was rejected.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do usually hear from my regular submitters when they make a whoops and I have to decline their site...regular submitters rock |thumb |
Quote:
|
UW, I would suspect that if you did a geo-block on your submit page, that the number of rejections would drop to almost nil. It is one of the reasons I went to partner accounts. I stopped wanting to deal with whatever comes in the door. I would rather decide who gets the use the door and leave it at that.
Alex |
I definately think it's time to put up an application page for partners for my two lists, but I'm not ready to close open submissions quite yet on either site, but I am doing a lot of banning lately, mostly at Earl's. Earl doesn't have any partner submitters yet because I haven't updated the script for it's facilitation. Wives has partners and they make up the bulk of the submissions there. (Very few submittors seem to realize that Wives now prefers free sites over galleries. That happens, I suppose, when you take a TGP and decide one day to call it a link list.;))
My plan is to share a partner database between the two lists so that if someone is a partner at Wives, they'll automatically have partner status as Earl's. Should be a good deal for the submitters. Now, I just have to motivate myself to make the changes. Admittedly, the changes would have to be easier than continuously muddling my way through a big backlog of shit. |
Hello,
This site was declined and I'm curious as to why. http://www.koalatsex.com/site/rage/c...ase/index.html Please let me know if I made a mistake so I don't make the same one twice! :) Thanks for your time. |thumb |
Ah, that was me getting a little touchy towards the end of my 2 month back-logged queue.:D Take a look at the recip table and think about the content of the site. The site itself is fine, but that recip table doesn't belong to that site. Earl doesn't use category-specific recips anymore (as you obviously know), so it's not a big deal to my list, and I usually wouldn't base my review on whether or not other lists are going to list the free site, but I do wonder if anyone else noticed that little faux paux and rejected you for it. If you resubmit it, I'll list it as is. I just wanted to make sure that you were aware of that oopsy.
|
Quote:
|
Generally, that should be fine. As you know, many lists employ bots that will flag sites that have made changes since being listed. I believe that most lists would simply take a quick glance at it to verify that it still meets the rules and unflag the site. Small changes and updates are not uncommon in the free site world.
|
I assume your missing me cause you rejected my site ;)
http://www.paradisebikinis.com/kinky...ish6/index.htm |
Quote:
Are you sure you really want to know how petty I can be? :) This is some of your code for Earl's recip: It renders colorless in my browser due to the lack of # in front of the numbers. Sometimes you have it correct, other times it's the only one in your table lacking destinct color. It always looks correct in IE because IE is a bowl of sloppy poo. I can't/won't review in IE because I don't want to be one of those reviewers begging for help with trojans and adware on the main board. :D Have you ever considered making the cells just a little taller or placing a tiny bit of space between each recip? That's a pretty compact table for clicking. BTW, thanks for taking the time to find out why I rejected the site. I've been rejecting a lot of stuff lately and seems that almost no one cares why, but they keep submitting with same problems. |
Sorted those colours out - don't know what happened there. That's sorted out now for future sites.
About the small recips. I made them based on custom recips I had seen others doing and they were the same size, but I think as I have kept the colours and styles it makes them appear smaller and a bit squashed. But as its you I have harnessed the power of CSS and made them all a bit bigger. But trust your recip to fuck it up and go into double lines: http://www.panty-sex.net/panties-and-dildo6/ |banghead| Hope all is good now |thumb |
Filthy Earl strikes again! |boobies|
Just knock the "Porn for Filthy Fucks" down to font size=1 and it'll be fine on both FF and IE. Thanks for fixing my colors. |
Hi UW,
Could you please tell me why was my site declined so that I can fix it ? http://www.adultsecret.net/sites/074/11/index.htm |
Quote:
If you choose to fix that and resubmit, please know I'll list that site as MILF, not mature. That babe needs to gain at least another ten years before she can be mature. ;) |
Everything is fixed now.
I've resubmitted the site. Thanks |
Hello Mr. Warrior,
This site was declined for a large blind thumb on the main page, but I'm not too sure how I can make it more clear that it is going to her website...|confused| http://www.thesexgarage.com/faith_be..._teen/main.htm Your thoughts would be appreciated.|thumb Thank you. |
Earl is presently sipping Moselle through a straw so I thought I'd step in
Unlink the picture... |
Quote:
Koalat, "You Make My Pussy So Wet!" does not imply that the pic will take you to her site. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc