The Official Link O'Rama Rejection Thread
 

Please Post any questions about sites that were declined to the Link O'Rama in this thread.

Please do so after you have looked at this page, which explains things in a little more detail.

Please include the URL of your site & the reason it was rejected.

My apologies to those that posted in here before Jim decided to let a bot delete posts :D

There was Sy's that was resolved, another that had the content out of order (but the reason for rejection was incorrectly marked Site Structure Violation) and a 3rd that had vid caps (and you can tell they are vid caps because the pic quality is not that great & any movement shows up as a blur)

Your submission:

Horny Black Girl
http://www.dailypornopost.com/08-200...ree/index.html

Has been rejected and it will not be listed.

Reason:
1200 Rule


The pictures were all 1300+ height + width and I think your reviewer made a mistake.


I re-did the pictures to a larger size then re-uploaded them and would like to have the site re-reviewed without re-submitting it because I want to be able to submit the site I just finished tomorrow. Yes I am a re-tard.


P.s. I dont like rejection emails. Id rather not know.

Hey Greenie!

Actually I'm not sure if my sites were rejected, but I submitted them last week, they haven't been listed so far, but I also got no rejection mail!

URL's:

http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../poppornteens/
http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../plushfuckers/

I'm a bit confused, because another one of my sites got listed, and I basically used the same template for the two above aswell. Just changed the colors & of course I now have 12 pix per gallery. Would be cool if you could have a look what's up with those sites, or if you're just some days behind with reviewing, ignore this post |thumb

WarBot - the truth shall set you free |buddy| It'll be in there with today's update (now don't you feel bad for picking on my new rules?)

OneWhoKnows:
http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../poppornteens/ - I don't have a home for sites that have a mix of soft & hardcore - can't put it TeenNudes because she's having sex in the 2nd gallery, can't put it in TeenSex because the 1st gallery is just her naked.
http://www.russianrealitysites.com/f.../plushfuckers/ - no idea on this one, so it'll be in there with the next update.

OK, thanks for the info Greenie. I'll keep that in mind for the next submission, so I don't mix up soft and hardcore anymore!

Got Declined Again (LOR)
 

Hi Greenie,

I got declined again for the reason "Lack of nudity". You should remember my site from yesterday's discussions:

http://www.camsescort.com/MagicFlyLiveCams/

I corrected everything we talked about and when I saw decline email this morning it almost killed me |cry|

I realize that my site doesn't have much nudity in it but the idea was to tease the user. If you agree with the decision of your reviewer can you tell me what the minimal nudity should be to get accepted on LOR?

Thanks
Cheetah

If you want to tease the surfer, then find non-nude link lists & tgp's to submit to.

Those pics would be tame if they were in Maxim.

No, I want to post in your LL |jester| So, can you explain what needs to be changed in my site to get listed in LOR?

Huh, I may have to start telling the truth more often... Nah! :)

Thanks Greenguy

Nudity would help. I don't have an exact number that I require, but SOME would be a good fucking start.

Shoot for 66-75% - 3-4 teaser pics followed by 8-9 pics of nipples & assholes & pussy lips.

A very smart guy told me something the other day that I think I will pass to you. Choose your content for the reviewer not the surfer. Most sales come from the index and main pages. Which the surfer will never see if you dont get listed.

That's a good advice. Looks like reviewer wasn't in a good mood when he was reviewing my site, because it was accepted already once on LOR. I'll try to get pictures of nipples & assholes & pussy lips from that chick to make reviewer happy |boobies| :D

IMO - that is an absolute crock of shit!

DD

I didnt think reviewers bought that much porn LOL

What about it do you disagree with and why?

why does the 1200 rule apply to movie images?
 

Hi greenguy and jim,

Im totally new to link lists, a week ago I thought they were called FGP's because they'd be freesite gallery pages lol.

I submitted this freesite and it was rejected
http://www.sexvps.com/fswild/blackfs1/index1.htm

it was rejected for the "1200" rule.
Now I can understand why you'd have that rule for images, but why would you have it for movie stills? |huh
That makes no sense.

lets look at one of the galleries:
http://sexvps.com/wildgals/blackwild2/wildblack2.html

those images are BIG, and pretty standard across the industry.
if you made them 700pixels on one side and 525 pixels on the other side they'd be WAY too big and too blurry, as most video slips dong go that size.

so I could submit galelries that size to you, but they would be blurry and would suck and your surfers would be like "this is garbage"

or I could submit galleries that are normal, that your surfers would enjoy.

By the way, can you point me out to Link Lists that would affect softcore free sites? Thanks!

sexvps - I think my reviewer selected the wrong reason - it was actually declined because the overall length of the movies is under 120 seconds.

By the way, can you point me out to Link Lists that would accept softcore free sites? Thanks!

cheetah - I have no idea.

Thanks Swedguy!

Well its your site and I appreciate that you let submitters voice their opinions, but those movies are 18 seconds each, and there are 6 of them.
The movies are large screen size and good quality.

I dont think your bookmarkers are going to look at the downloadable high quality 18 second movies and say "This linklist site sucks, they only gave me free 18 second movies and not 20 second movies."

I thought free sites were supposed to give away less than the tgps.
But its your site and you can do what you want. thanks for listening.

sexvps - well, let me run this past you: what should I cut it off at? It might only be 2 seconds/movie, but what if it was 4? That ok? How about 6? 10?

I have to cut it off someplace & 120 total is the current cutoff.

Don't know should I open new topic (I'm back from vacation and I see new rules etc.)

GG, my celebrity sites aren't listed on LOR anymore. Did you delete those sites because of new rules?

Example:

http://www.freesex-club.com/angelina...enes/index.htm

I had about 10-15 celebrity sites listed on your Nude Celebs page.

Thanks and sorry if this is wrong topic.

Greenie, thanks for allowing me to respond to your rule. Especially since im new to LL's and am an old tgp guy.

Ive been the owner and reviewer of a popular niche tgp for 5 years, nothing compared to you, but Ive made a nice little site for my self.
I was also the reviewer and account manager for a big BIG tgp a few years ago that gets over a million uniques a day.

I look for the quality and the freshness of the content.
If I see some HOT clear movies I think my surfer will like, I wouldnt reject them because theyre only 10 seconds each.

I post them and the surfers dont care, they got to see some hot porn and thank me for giving it to them.
Theres not one surfer out there who is counting seconds.

Even the big video tgps, who have some of the hardest rules to get listed imo doesnt require 20 seconds on their clips. and those are *Video* only site.

Ive never heard of 20 second minimum in my life. its just too much and its unfair to the surfers that theyre going to miss out on some hot new site because the reviewer wont let them see it because the clips are 16 seconds.

Ive made so many sales from small short clips because those clips had something new and exciting.
Clips are meant to tease and get someone to say "THATS HOT! I want more", theyre not meant to be so long that they bore the surfer or get him off.
I believe a site who does a 20 second minimum is shooting itself in the foot and is NOT doing the surfer any favors.

I normally wouldnt care what a site owner does, but youre the biggest and most linklists follow your example, so its going to suck when all these LL's are going to follow this 20 second rule and force their surfers to miss out on some hot new products because of it, and cause their submitters to use more bandwith or have to redo their sites to meet the requirements.

thanks again for letting me voice my opinion.

Maybe you should re-read his rules. There is no 20-second rule.

Opinions are great :D

Here's the problem (aside form the fact that you got rejected for the overall length of the movies & not the length of the individual movies) Let's say that I loved your site & you have 6 18 second movies (108 sec total) and JoeBlow submits me a site with 6 18 second movies & I decline it because it's nothing special. JoeBlow comes here & posts that I accepted your site & not his, rejecting him for 108 seconds & allowing yours.

I don't need that :D

I drank beer with the big green monster in chicago and months after that got a site rejected for lacking 1 sec of video|jester|

so there you go friends are friends and rules are rules...

also I had some sites rejected for soft reasons and I use to ask why and quit a long time ago because having 1 LL not listing your site once in a blue moon isnt really worth the time posting

Errrm... don't wanna stand on your nerves Greenie, but it's still not listed |loony|

Hi Greenie,

I submitted the following site to Link O'Rama but it was not listed. Can you please tell what wrong with my site, so I can fix please.

http://www.redhot-babes.net/index.html submitted 12th august

Cheers in advance Sat

Question
 

Hi guys,|waves|
I submitted these sites last couple of days, please tell me my mistakes |banghead| and i will fix em in the future |roses|

http://www.anime-hentai-sex.net/love...ans/index.html

http://www.hotanimexxx.com/japanese-anime/index.html

http://www.anime-porn-anime.com/cute...irl/index.html

thank you|thumb

Who are you? It seems that every domain is a different webmaster name but the same template?

So sorry for the mess:(
I live in Eastern Europe, here the people and the goverments still isnt free thinking , thats why i am submitting my sites under different names.

In the future i can use only one name and/or nickname.

Thank you

MMM two of the three domains you have here are listed as being owned by a webmaster in the UK? The other is blocked give me a break will ya

thank you MrMaryLou
You got a Private Message

Sites rejected on LOR
 

Hi, I got these 2 sites rejected

http://www.sex-xxx-sites.com/sites/23/
http://www.sex-xxx-sites.com/sites/24/

for Reason:
120 Seconds Movie Rule

but, I got 8 x 20 sec clips :(

Try posting your question into the rejection thread Greenie started:

http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...ad.php?t=33840

Hi, I got these 2 sites rejected

http://www.sex-xxx-sites.com/sites/23/
http://www.sex-xxx-sites.com/sites/24/

for Reason:
120 Seconds Movie Rule

but, I got 8 x 20 sec clips