![]() |
A>B>C Recips for linklists?
I've been playing around with making the recips for free sites listed go to
: 33.3% Back To Jays 33.3% To Snizzshare 33.3% To Other sites I have in my network I want people opinion? Is this bad? SE wise it should help because it is widely known that straight recips can lead to penelty. What do you guys think? Jay |
That will probably not help you at all. Building a quality site will..
|
I've seen a lot of LL owners (especially big ones) rejecting free sites for having their recips along with others that are not linking to a LL (for example Snizzshare).
I think that is pretty bad for the business. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Personally, I think the traditional LL model is in the shitter right now (at least compared to what it used to be), and I wonder why every time someone comes up with a new idea a lot of folks dig in their heels. I think Jay's idea has merit, and should be explored. |
Quote:
|
I don't work with recips to sites other than the LL for the reasons mentioned above (rejection by other LL's). I don't think it's a bad idea, SEO-wise though. It's probably better than the current model.
|
Quote:
I'm rejecting sites that I see linking to non-link-lists in their recips, seeing as the recips are there as a way of linking back to the link list that you have submitted to. Don't even think this is a tube site thing - it's a non-link-list thing - what the other site is is irrelevant. |
For the LL owners that are rejecting freesites with ABC recips because other LL are rejecting them, I assume the reason for that is your not seeing any benefit (other than providing content to your surfers) from them, like link juice or traffic.
Is this correct? |
There is another aspect to all this & I'll be completely honest with it: the 1st time I saw a Jay's recip linked to Snizz Share instead of his link list, I thought it was a shady way to get traffic & links to Snizz Share. It's not like he came here & started a thread & said this is what he wanted to do & ABC & whatever. They just started to pop up when I was reviewing.
I also wondered how long it'd take for a big link list to add paysite link codes to their recips. If other Link Lists want to accept them, then so be it. But I see it as another "slippery slope" that I don't want to tread on. |
I too think that a link list's reciprocal link should be a direct reciprocal link and not a link to some other site. I can't argue the SE benefit of that type of linking and we all know that Jay is a respected SE strategist - but I really don't feel that recip links are the proper place to push traffic or link juice to our other properties.
|
For me as a FS builder, the problem is getting my sites declined at the big-traffic LL's because there are non-LL links in the recip.
As an LL owner, it's trying to keep track of the mess. Why should I send traffic to site B if site B lists no sites with links back to me? And how the hell would I know if site B links to site C and site C has links back to me? Fuck, I'm confused already |loony| |
I know nothing about SEO all I know is I can't submit to Jay's any more because of your change in recips. and I miss the traffic you used to send.
|
If it doesn't link back to the listing site it's not technically a reciprocal. I'm not against thinking outside the box, but here I definitely see the slippery slope argument.
|
Jay,
Are you declining FS that use a custom recip? For example, instead of the snizzshare recip, using a textlink to Jays frontpage on top and a category link on bottom. Jay's XXX Links CATEGORY |
Quote:
Does everything have to stay in 1999? The rest of the internet has moved on and evolved. I still pay a reviewer more than enough so other people get free traffic. Snizzshare is a 100% legit (abliet fake) "tube" site, it damn sure is no Redtube or Tube 8. After some surfer sees pornhub.com do you think they will every go back to a linklist again? That all aside, the linking methods we use worked great 5 years ago, but Google is hip to recip linking and it will actually hurt you. Don't believe me, read up: http://www.webmasterworld.com/link_d...nt/3434655.htm http://www.knoge.com/make-money-onli...dont-work.html Hell just look "Google Repicolal Linking": http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...procal+linking Why do we insist on sticking to a method that just dooms up to failure? That's the one thing that really frustrates me with this who linklist game is most people refusal to evolve. Just so nobody gets their panties in a wad I am re-doing my link tables this week back to just normal recips. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1999? Hell, in 97, I asked people to link to my site & I'd do the same to theirs. I don't even think the Google guys knew about Google back then :D
|
Quote:
If "you" want to evolve... go fucking evolve.. .. but don't come here telling everyone that "we" are 'old school', or 'out of touch', or 'refuse to change'. As has been mentioned.. we HAVE been here, doing this, since before 1997 and guess what we are still here. Maybe we would have retired already if we had a dollar for every "new idea" that came along and then failed dismally, or disappeared - like the fad it was - in just a few months. "We" don't always get it right, and we don't always lead the world in innovation.... BUT! "WE" have been making sure Quote:
So if you want to go change shit.. go do it.. but don't forget the one rule that has existed almost since the beginning.. It is "OUR" Lists and "WE" make the rules for "OUR" Lists.... dont like them.. dont submit.. it is that simple DD |
Quote:
|couch| |
Help me out with something - with the ABC link trades, the way Jay has it, Jay is A, the free site is B & SnizzShare is C - right?
How is this supposed to help who out as far as SE's? And who is it supposed to help - A, B or C? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Links to other sites within a recip have always been one of my pet peeves. Bookmark Links' recip has a second link to a review site and that bugs the shit out of me. Some of Ne*Dee's recips link directly to sales pages on the site instead of category pages. That bugs me too. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Buy more than 1 domain, put your eggs in more than one back, ... we can all be on the streets as easily as the next guy just my opinion |
Hummmm....
I see your recips are still snizzing. Interesting....... XPorn |
You want interesting? I just looked at a Free Site that has this in the recips:
Jays XXX Blogs BBW Porn Blogs This could be one of 2 things: 1 - a screw up by the FS builder (he's a "trusted" submitter as far as I know) 2 - Jay thinking that the blog site is ok where the tube site was not If it's #2, I'll just have to restate that my problem is not with the tube site, my problem is that this is not a recip link - this FS was not submitted to and is not listed on the blog site. |banghead| |
Quote:
I'm just going to have Dare redo the links to the bland A>B recip this week. I know, I'm a piece of shit for trying anything innovative. Sorry about that. Welcome back to 1999. :-) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Recip links are recip links, a link telling the surfer where the site was listed, and who listed it, and returning some click traffic to the lists that listed the site. That is all! The "use" of recip links to gain search engine advantage is bullshit theory that seems to have taken hold of some peoples minds! It is a recip link.. if you want some other sort of link from/to somewhere else, get it some other way. DD |
Quote:
Quote:
If this was to continue, what's to stop a big Link List from having the webmaster link to a paysite? FPA? Auto-installer? I can see a lot of potential problems with this & causing extra review time is only the start. Like DDave said, it's a RECIP link - you link to me, I link back to you. |
I always thought of a recip link as a way of saying .. "If you like my product, here is where you can find more just like it". I am strictly console/pop-up free wherever I can possibly be and want the link lists I submit my sites to to be the same. The sites they list meet the same criteria, so everyone wins. Likewise, surfers on their sites know that if they click on a link they are not heading into some circle-jerk hell that is filled with all kinds of crapola.
Now, with the A-B-C idea, I have to agree with GG. Where does it stop? Why confuse the poor porn-hungry surfer who is looking for a Reciprocal Link -- a link to a list -- by feeding him something else. It just isn't honest to anyone. Lastly, it is a way to thank the link lists for showcasing us and pointing the visitors in our direction. I have no issue at all with giving honest recip links to both category and to the lists themselves. These guys earn it! |
Quote:
1. This is GGandJim: Everybody kisses GG's ass. 2. Nobody even clicks those links anyway. They are for SEO. 3. Study up: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&c...enalty&spell=1 |
Subject: change recips
From: jayisagoldengod@roadrunner.com Date: July 8, 2008 6:27:32 PM PDT To: kartem@gmail.com Cc: webmaster@greenguysboard.com Art, Can you change the recip table back to all straight recips back to Jay's categories. Please have this done by Friday. Jay |
Quote:
2. BS My link list's get around 20% of there traffic from recip tables 3. You are right. I could not get a good ranking in google till i started a-b-c link trades. Your idea of a-b-c recips is a great one and would earn you considerable rankings in search engines, but your not going to change anyones mind around here or anywhere else. You should find another way around this, and figure out a way for your submitters to link to one of your sites using one of there three outgoing links. |
xxxJay, I have been around too long to kiss anyone's ass. I refuse to start now, no matter who you are or what you are offering me. The few here that know me will tell you that I am not afraid to speak my mind or stand behind my work. Oh, and while we are at it, this is not the only board, nor is GG the only link list in town. While I enjoy the exposure and traffic, I know the time in his limelight is short due to so many other sites being submitted. If he links my sites, great.. if not, great.
If I submit a quality site and a LL owner chooses to add it to their list, my opinions are not attached to it. What is attached is my honesty and integrity. I won't lower the quality of a site after I submit, I won't change my exit links to something non-adult after I submit. I never have, and I don't intend to start now. Your idea of the link trades is not a bad one -- just poorly named. I do have 3 outbound links per page that I can use. What is to stop me from using one to someone's site (provided it is not blind)? For example, on my last gallery page, I can always add a named or bannered teaser that directs a hungry surfer over to another site instead of offering an advertiser's banner. But.. what is in it for me? Why should I? As commonplace as Google has become it is not the only directory in the universe, nor has it become endowed with some godlike powers. Over the years, I have gained more hits from one single Persian Kitty link than from anything else. Why? Surfers don't use Google to tell them to go to Persian Kitty or GG or Smutgremlin or any other top directory. It is word of mouth or prior experience. Also, Google has a reputation for changing their strategies and "penalties" faster than most women change their panties. The link you quoted is over a year old. YES, I do click those links on the tables. If I like the site I am on and want to see more of the same type/quality, I know from experience to check the links on the recip. If it's a LL I don't know, maybe I want to know about it. Where else would I go? If I Google for some unknown unlinked site, I am for sure going to end up virused or in some pop-up, console-fed hell. It happens every single day and it costs the unsuspecting hundreds of dollars if not more every year. How do you surf for porn? That should be a good guide right there. If you don't, ask your drinking/partying buddies. |
Quote:
http://www.jays-xxx-links.com/submit_categories.html |
Hit this one a bit late, but I agree, A>B recips hurt. Not just 'less advantage than A>B>C recips', but actually hurt* (when it comes to google, and let's be honest, we all much prefer good google serps than any other SE).
As for clicks on recips, sure, they do occur, but wouldn't people rather trade the few clicks (yeah I know they add up) from those, for better SERPS? And to answer a statement from I forget who, along the lines of 'what's in it for me, the freesite submitter?', well, better SERPS for the LLs you sub to, and consequently more of that precious SE traffic. *in my personal experience, before anyone asks for a link to my source :) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc