what i have notice
 

Oke the last days i see an increase from incest sites and sites with alot of time the word young boys or young girls on it submitted to my linksites and the ones i review, anybody notice the same? Shit is that they submit with diffrent names and emails .

We've been seeing them for the past few months - pretty much anythign submitted to me with an inappropriate use of the word "young" gets deleted.

yep i do the same, and some ended on my blacklist. Have learned that from MMl chat long time ago|bananna|

yeah, I have noticed the same thing. Quick delete here too! |angry|

this "Dads & Babes" paysite seems to be popular...

Yeah same thing here. :(

My ban list is really getting huge. :(

Yes the play on words gets worse instead of better :(

I sent them one email, and then if submit again....and they do because they dont read them i blacklist.

Fonz its not the just dad and babes , i get sites witch look like a normale mature sites the pics are normal till you read the text, all incest shit.
And for real the combination they use the word young on their is very very bad, also it looks like they cound that that people have the addblocker of norton, one linked line above the banner and one linked line under the banner, so if norton blocked that banner you get only the text and a totally different view what is offered there.It Sucks

So where do you guys/girls draw the line with the word "young"

is "young girls n*ked" a no-no?
is "young girls in their early twenties" a no-no?
is "Matures fuck with young boy" a no-no?

Generally, I only allow the word "young" in conjunction with "men" or "women". I don't allow anything with "young girls" or "young boys".

My limit:
young woman no problem
young guys no problem
ll is good as long i dont see y*ung b*ys or young g*rls, what i saw was more bad and i blacklist, dont give me the shit of mature fucking young b*ys you will make me mad
and special if they use fresh y*ung dicks from b*ys and all hel it realy make me mad, now fonz you know we are from a country that dont care about the age, but i have 2 kids and i dont like people using these words this way, if using y*ung B*ys and g*rls is the only way to make those people money.......then they dont belong in this bizz.

I've been getting the same crap submited too with the "dads & babes" stuff.

Like an ass, I listed some of that stuff...but only because it looked like some regular mature oriented porn.

After reading this thread, I think I made a really stupid move by listing those sites. How wide spread are these submits anyhow? I'm starting to think I'm going to go and remove & ban those sites. I check it all when it comes in, but it looks like some of the mature woman f'ing some guy in their mid twentys type content.

Ok...I feel like an ass now for allowing that. Live and learn I guess, huh?

|sad|

CybrFire, you not stupid some of those sites i list it al depends wich words they use, s dont feel guilty

eh the dads and babes stuff i dont automatically delete - i depends on how the free site is promoting them... i mean if we are going to accept MILF (moms id like to fuck) then why is the word "dad" automatically raising hackles.

now if they say things like "love between dads and their teenagers" or things that suggest incest or cp then i am out but the tour itself for dads n babes doesnt promote it that way imho.

Same here. Some times my wife review the submissions and she do not read all the stuff, I think she likes looking at pictures more than reading :)
I went back to some and read the banners and all the text on the sites, I am going to remove the sites

Sorry...that was ass backwards...

It was supposed to be some mature guy fucking some woman in their mid twentys.

Ok, that went smooth...


|hammer

Hi vangend, atleast now people will be more aware of certain things like that. It's a learning process. But what can ya do.

I too am guilty of going over it quickly some times, and judgeing it based on the pics. Although some of these people used average text wording and didn't really clue it off with the use of young with boy and so on.

I know I will be declining and or banning the hell out of anyone useing that content from now on.

I agree vanged , when just look at the banners and pics you wont se something is wrong but when reading the text you do know something is totally wrong.........we are only human we do make mistakes, but we have the power to remove those mistakes|bananna|

Sec_man, you've got a good point there. The shame of it all is that there's always someone out there that will take something like "dads & babes" and try and make more attractive to the sick types that like incest...just to make an extra sale or atleast try to.

Yes, there's alot of sponsors out ther that have older guys f'ing some woman in their early 20's...but it only takes one or two sick bastards to twist that and ruin it for everyone else.

As for having the power to stop it on our own sites, no problem with that. I'm no longer accepting that sponsor/content from anyone any longer.

I am not sure about the quantity of freesites getting submitted. But I have seen an increase in incest site on search engines. For many porn realated searches, lots of incest sites are listed at google. As I see most of these sites are subdomains and subfolders of few main domians and the contents are mostly the same.
It might be the Incest site sponsors themselves who are doing this.

Neo |sad|

No one should be surprised if all these "old with young" theme sites we are all seeing at the moment, suddenly dissapear.... and end up being redirected to a full on incest site eventually |pissed|

*edit. In fact, chances are they will redirect any SE clicks that come in, even if they do keep the sites online

I know at most of the countries incest is banned. Is there any country where they allow incest? (I mean in case Adult websites)

If there are o LL accpeting those sites why are they making the sites again and agin and submitting? |pissed|

Neo

if i am right dmoz list incest sites too

I am 37, if I see a young girl of 21, that's exactly what she is to me
a
young
hot looking
infinitely doable (in my dreams)
girl.
I can understand the entire disassociating yourself with CP and anyone trying to make money on CP is not only a criminal, but a seriously disturbed induhvidual. But I think the level of paranoia in the business regarding this topic has gone way off the deep end......
I would feel much more comfortable with the term young girl then I would with say the term teen personally, but that doesn't stop anyone from using the words
Teen
School
School Girl
et al....
in making their bling.
I was happy to see the word '******' go, but there has to be a point where you draw a line and say clearly
yes, she is 18 (or over) and yes she is a young girl.

I can see it now, the adult internet in 10 years promoting sites with text like this


"Watch these over the age of 18 yet not to mature women as they engage in consensual sex with a partner of their choosing while sober and after carefully considering the ramifications of their action.
Get relatively quick access to the pictures and videos of the event by moving forward to the next page"


Hot teens fucking will be a thing of the past.......as will booming sales.


spaz

LOL that might not be too far away :/

I prefer the term coed. That congers up the right image in my targets eyes. :D

LMFAO!!|jester|

I don't like schoolgirl either. I try to use college coed, or something like that. I think "young woman" is a good replacement for "young girl". I guess having children (especially daughters) tends to make me look at it a little heavier than most people. I agree that we are under heavy scrutiny, but it goes with the biz. It is the downside, but the upside is being able to sit here and work at 2 o'clock am. in my panties and a t-shirt. :)

must... control ... self

cant... make ... lewd comment..... about ..... milf in panties!

|jester|

Hey Sec_man, you know after re-reading what you had said about if one accepts MILFs doing a younger man, than why not accept a young woman doing an older guy...than why not list that dads&babes stuff (if it's done tastefully)

I still get some of that content, but not to my surprise, the same guy who was submitting that, just started submitting the index linked to nothing but a full page add!

LOL...guess I started declining sooner than I thaught. I'm still accepting the dads&babes stuff...but only if it's done in a tastefull way though.

|peace|

I know one of the main reasons I don't list those sites is not only the wording on alot of them, but the fact that the 2257 info is nowhere to be found. There is a little disclaimer written on the sponsor site, but no link to it. And I personally would much rather err on the side of caution.....
Jaden

yup, i think that is the real key to all this, as owners we seem to be too quick on the delete button many times. i like volume and unless its a real violation, not just worded funny i will list it.

jaden, that is a good point. but keep in mind there are 2257 statements on a lot of ****** sites too. Technically they are legal because of the "non-sexual" loophole. many times i see sites with full on legal 2257 statements that say things like "the models depected here are all in non sexual situations" instead of flat out "all models appearing on this website were over 18 at the time of photography"

just keep in mind that just cuz they have a legal 2257 doesnt mean you wanna have anything to do with em :)

Any UK webmasters watching Eastenders right now (the 2nd biggest soap on UK TV) broadcast by the BBC - they have an incest stroyline running right now - Has there been much in the press about lately?