Who DOESN'T allow hardcore on warning page here?
 

Hi all,
Trying to sort out my submit list into those who allow hardcore on the warning page and those who don't after reading another thread on this board. I gotta admit I thought the majority didn't allow it, seems I'm mistaken there. I'll start by assuming for the purposes of this thread that everyone allows hardcore, can you post your LL if that isn't the case so I can make sure I can group those together.
Many thanks for your time :)
Jel

None for me.

Thanks!

I allow it....I think - LOL

This remind me of AmpCheck for some reason :D

Put whatever you want on your warning page as long as they are over 18, human, and consenting. :)

as you know from the other post, none for us... thanks :)

Ok now I am intrigued?

Why?
On what premise is the rule based/?
On what law is the rule based?


DD
(Yes I am asking a serious question)

I dont care

I don't usually use hardcore on my warning page because it seems to defeat the purpose of having a warning page in the first place.

I like getting picked up by search engines, and if someone gets to my site by an SE instead of a LL (and yes I can see by my stats that I have gotten some hits for absolutely ridiculous things that have no relevance to my site whatsoever, or keywords that are relevant but can be rather ambiguous taken out of the context of porn) I feel like my warning page should at least provide some sort of buffer and let people know what they are about to see.

I mean it doesn't seem to happen often, but I would hate for little Johnny to be doing a report on milking cows, and get slammed with a page of hardcore from one of my pregnant/lactating sites that "milking" is a top keyword for. Not a good chance it would happen, but I feel better having it that way. And thats not to say he wouldn't click through, but at least I did what I could on my end and put the warning there along with the links to the parental control sites

DD

I am with Jaden. No law or anything. Just feel that they should
have to click past the warning before being expossed to hardcore.

I understand that se's make it to different pages but this is the
page that I will be linking to. So I feel that in a way I am giving the
warning page my approval for the se.

How can that make sense though?
Search engines also pick up the page after your warning coz it's linked, and i'm sure most of us do just as much promo for our main pages as well as the warning/index pages?

With that said if that url is in a search engine is there still no chance of someone clicking on the main page url and therefor bypassing the warning page anyway?

I understand what you guys are trying to say but to be honest the name, description or keywords on the seach engine should give it away that it's a porn site. |peace|

My thought is that what I link to is clean. What a se does beyond that is out of my control.

Really all I want is the warning page to be just that. A warning.

I know I would hate to find a bridge out sign at the bottom of a river.|doh|

None for me as well.

This is my thinking, as well.

Hah!

Hehehe |jester|
That makes sense, I can sort of see the logic in that.

Obviously there are a few factors we have to look at.

GOing back to the original question though all my link sites will allow hardcore images as long as they are not Severely 'obscene'.