Is this the worse ratio ever? 1:????
 

|jester| I made a sale today... to an single girl amateur site... billed via CCBill...

I couldnt remeber when I last got a sale... so I checked back for the year to date...

OMFG!

Ratio = 1:21104

Yes that is right 1 in TWENTY ONE THOUSAND.....

hmm think I should drop the link?

DD

Re: Is this the worse ratio ever? 1:????
 

Hey, why drop it now - it's starting to produce! |bananna|

are going to tell us what site it is? I am really courious...

Hey... a sale is a sale! At least it wasn't 0:21104!

Christ, even I do better than that.:D

I think I did about 1 in 25,000 with sextracker several years ago :)

If it doesn't rebill I would definitely drop the link. |rasta|

I have a webmaster who signed up under me who might be able to give you a run for you money. |jester|

http://www.morepornforme.com/1/captured.jpg

i did worse
 

I won I Won. I WON.

My SE traffick did 1 in 74325 with sextracker several years ago .
Most of the traffic was from AltaVista and Infoseek Now Dead!

Very Sad.

Congrats...1:21000 is outstanding :)

I have 1:26,496 for the year with one of the bigger sponsors. Its so rare to get a signup that I wasnt even aware I was pushing them and I only discovered it when I did a yearly review of stats remote.

That ratio sucks some serious ass :(
Im not as experienced as you but for now Im doing
0:8000 with one of the big sponsors.
Strange is that I was like 1:700 before.

i once did equaly as bad, then things just picked up on it's own. i stoped promoting and sales still come in every so often. Not enough to warant another campaign but still paid off in the long run i guess

Yikes - how sad is that?!?

What's going on out there? 0:8000 when it was 1:700? How long between the change? Is this recently or over a period of time that your results have changed?

Wow...... |pcsucks|

1 in 74325
1 in 25,000

Sheesh! Sign me up to SexTracker... NOT!


Mishi/KoolKat/Ramster - I think your right.. it "could" be the start of a run of sales... and if it doesnt Rebill, then yep it's goooooone!


I wont name the site,.. as I dont "promote" it as such.... it just sits in my LL Cat....

..but if anyone has a "convertin" amateur site, that is worth promoting I would like to hear about it.(Dont spam up this thread with BS!)

DD

Well it was converting around 1:700 and suddenly stopped, for now its 0:8000 and still growing :)

Maybe someones pushed the "shave on" button ;-)

I had some ratios like that with Maxcash (around 2000 or 2001).

Great thread,
Just checked my ccbill stats from Jan 1st this year until now, 2 sales for a total of $19.94 from a smaller sponsor at a ratio of 1:11422 Just a single banner on a page which gets pretty targeted traffic. Figure I'll remove that one lol

Re: Is this the worse ratio ever? 1:????
 

Do you use any remote stats software?

If not, you should try statsremote.com. If not for that software, I'd probably have sponsors with bad ratios getting out of control as well.

Single girl sites are a different beast. I do well by linking all of my sites together & will often notice the same guy signing up to more than one of my sites on the same day. But general TGP traffic converts terribly. |sad|

I'd be willing to bet that I have some ratios like that on some of the CCBill programs I've joined over the years.

DDave - does this program have hosted galleries or free sites that use the entire CCBill URL for the links? Like:

http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clic...m/gallery.html

If so, all those clicks count, which is why I think a lot of the ratios look very bad when this is done.

Of course, if that's not the case, then you might want to remove that link :D

I agree
 

Greenguy is right better to send you traffic to another sponsor.

Trial and error is the key.
Doesn't make money try another.
Shit, does Luck have anything to do?

Yeah GG.. first thing I checked... no galls , all traffic to tour...

Oh well.. I wont be the last time I/or anyone else see ratios like that.... it happens..

DD