Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Question for GG re lack of listing (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=13890)

Ms Naughty 2004-12-01 07:42 PM

Question for GG re lack of listing
 
Hi there.
I've submitted a couple of sites to LOR in the last 2 weeks

http://www.clitbot.com/reallystupid/ and
http://www.clitbot.com/withoutshirts/

but they don't seem to have made the grade.

Problem?

Greenguy 2004-12-01 08:12 PM

That 1st one is pretty fucking funny! |jester|

I thinkt he problem was that it didn't really fit into the 4women category, but I'll get it listed in "misc" tomorrow.

The 2nd one, well, the lack of cock got it declined :(

Ms Naughty 2004-12-01 09:18 PM

Thanks for the quick response GG.

Admittedly the stupid pics isn't necessarily "for women" - I could probably do a mirror site with the same galleries and pitch it to men (hmmm, I might do that LOL).

It was more a thought that a lot of women feel that stuff in porn is silly, so I was appealing to that idea.

Re the withoutshirts one... Ah well. Who knew a site could be TOO softcore? LOL

Mishi 2004-12-02 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by grandmascrotum
Thanks for the quick response GG.

Admittedly the stupid pics isn't necessarily "for women" - I could probably do a mirror site with the same galleries and pitch it to men (hmmm, I might do that LOL).

It was more a thought that a lot of women feel that stuff in porn is silly, so I was appealing to that idea.

Re the withoutshirts one... Ah well. Who knew a site could be TOO softcore? LOL

The boys still don't get it, do they? ;) Not all women fall down in a pool of their own juices at the first site of a cock. Frankly, I think they're pretty ugly. But I'm gay that way.

That first site is a HOOT! I'd damned well better see it at my link list soon. |waves|

Ms Naughty 2004-12-02 03:07 AM

Hi Mishi
I'll submit it shortly :)

The "without shirts" site was an attempt to appeal to those slightly squeamish ladies who like a bit of pec but not too much peen.

Of course, by the time they get to Greenguy, they're probably past that. And I'm not going to hassle him about this... he got enough abuse from me about creating a porn for women section LOL

:)

Greenguy 2004-12-02 08:42 AM

Now now, we are pornographers - people can see pics of hunky men with no shirts in catalogs.

I kick sites back all the time for lack of nudity, so don't feel slighted :D

LET'S SEE SOME COCK! |jester|

Cleo 2004-12-02 08:47 AM

I do have different rules for my For Woman listings and probably would have listed both since I really need more For Woman sites.

BUT…

I really liked the first site but was a bit confused by all the pics of woman, guess it would work for the bi-curios.

On the second one all I can say is that the Sears catalog has more nudity in it.

SmithsMedia 2004-12-02 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greenguy
That 1st one is pretty fucking funny! |jester|

I thinkt he problem was that it didn't really fit into the 4women category, but I'll get it listed in "misc" tomorrow.

The 2nd one, well, the lack of cock got it declined :(

GG - Ijust showed my girlfriend the without shirts - shes said it was very sexy and erotic - she added that women think cocks are ungly things LOL

Im not questioning you judgement just thought it was a quite a nice insight into the females point of view :-)

Mishi 2004-12-03 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Greenguy
Now now, we are pornographers - people can see pics of hunky men with no shirts in catalogs.

I kick sites back all the time for lack of nudity, so don't feel slighted :D

LET'S SEE SOME COCK! |jester|

Is there something you're wanting to get off your *cough* chest? ;)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc