Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Question regarding voyeur content (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=17311)

msanchez 2005-03-09 12:31 PM

Question regarding voyeur content
 
Hi everybody,

was thinking of expanding my horizons today and making a site in the voyeur niche.

As I have started to do this I notice that alot of the voyeur content available looks pretty much like crap in my opinion.

But maybe thats the thing with voyuer as its not set in a studio with pro photographers and such.

But before I got and submit a site I just wanted to check here first and see what input you all have regarding the quality of voyuer content and getting listed.

Thanks and cheers

Greenguy 2005-03-09 01:15 PM

If I see content that I think a surfer would think was staged (camera moves, girl looks at the camera, an obvious content set/location) then I decline it.

msanchez 2005-03-09 01:43 PM

OK thanks GG

So it looking kinda crappy is a part of it then.

Well I send you the site for today of course and we will see how it goes.

Verbal 2005-03-09 02:45 PM

Hi msanchez,
I think the non-pro feel really makes the pics more believable. This is the one niche where I'd accept somewhat below-average content (within certain limits, lol). Send me some sites too if you'd like since we don't get many voyeur submits these days. :)

msanchez 2005-03-09 03:50 PM

Hi verbal, Ill take a look at your rules and see if I comply and if I do Ill send a site over today.

Thanks and Cheers

Cleo 2005-03-09 03:56 PM

Just as my rules for pics of webcam girls or different then my other niches my unofficial rules for voyeur sites are different. Grainy not so great pics or ok for voyeur as long as they are believable voyeur pics. :)

dareutwo 2005-03-09 04:11 PM

Ummmm all of the above...
There are some good voyeur pics out there, I think there is 8 of them :D
Grainy, small, those rules are relaxed a lot.

Greenguy 2005-03-09 04:41 PM

Yeah - I wouldn't go as far as saying "crappy" pics are acceptable, but I think you get the gist of it :)

msanchez 2005-03-09 04:44 PM

Quote:

Yeah - I wouldn't go as far as saying "crappy" pics are acceptable, but I think you get the gist of it
Heh maybe crappy wasnt the right term ;)

but I hear what you all are saying. Thanks for the advice.

msanchez 2005-03-09 05:15 PM

GG thats still no vid caps right?

Greenguy 2005-03-09 06:54 PM

Correct.

RawAlex 2005-03-09 07:16 PM

Sometimes voyeur pictures are partially obscured, not centered, etc... basically NOT pro looking pics, but rather pics that look like you would see if someone hid a camera on a shelf or something. Security cams, long telephotos to couples making out, things like that...

I am NOT as fussy about voyeur as I am about others, but I don't like "pro voyeur" stuff, it's dull.

Alex

plateman 2005-03-09 08:30 PM

yeap you gotta be a true voyeur that would look through a dirty keyhole and get a look at a naked chick or a small crack and have pictures like that..


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc