Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   OK, I'm An Idiot! (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=23867)

DJilla 2005-09-09 09:18 PM

OK, I'm An Idiot!
 
So I can't find "The Official "Why I Didn't Get Listed At Link O Rama" thread... I'm looking and looking and looking and my dog is sitting here with his legs and eyes crossed telling me I have one more minute to get the leash or he's quitting. So I'm doing it here real quick so the dog doesn't do it over there...

Been submitting for awhile, decent acceptance rate at the various lists but now I'm trying to move up the rookie ladder and tighten up things. I am wondering if the below examples would be accepted at Link-O-Rama? Whadda ya think?

http://www.sexdug.com/inter/032805/alt/index.html
http://www.sexdug.com/blow/alt/042905/index.html
http://www.sexdug.com/asian/alt/042005/index.html

Thanks. Rather know now what to do rather than two more weeks down the line. Best and good luck to all.

binxgook 2005-09-09 09:43 PM

DJilla, Hi Binxgook here. A couple things I noticed are

1. None of those sites fit 8x6. That will get you rejected immediately.

2. You have some banners that arent showing. That may get you rejected.

3. You are using some REALLY OLD sponsor content on atleast one of those sites and that will surely get you rejected alot.

4. They all seem to be the same design, which is not good. I have been blacklisted because of templates so be careful of that.

"If your just looking for a few pictures to get off on then proceed to our sample galleries."

Why push the surfer to get off with your free stuff?? Why should they go to your sponsor then?? I even stopped using the word "FREE" for the most part in my sites. The more FREE thier is, the less of a need to buy anything.

Thats kinda a strange set up you have for your recip tables. Makes the page really long and some of the recips are grossly to large.

Thats some of the things I see right off the top. Hope that helps alittle. |thumb

DJilla 2005-09-09 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by binxgook
2. You have some banners that arent showing. That may get you rejected.

Hmmm! What banners aren't showing up? I just checked the sites again.. everything is there?

Cleo 2005-09-09 09:57 PM

Pages are a mess in Safari and aren't too great in Firefox either.

morruga 2005-09-09 10:11 PM

Safari and Firefox are for webmasters!
if you can see the site in IE i think that should be enough
But you are right... pages are a mess in those browsers :D

juggernaut 2005-09-09 10:19 PM

I dont know about safari but I see alot of FF comming from overseas. I would not go so far as placing them as a WM only browser. FF made a very strong play when it came out. IE was having a shit load of problems at the time and that also made for a strong campain for people to get DL it.

MrMaryLou 2005-09-09 10:20 PM

Just at first glance they scroll at 800 wide and you are using video caps both are not allowed :( I think you should take a peek at the rules and see if your work fits :) http://www.link-o-rama.com/greenguy/therules.htm

binxgook 2005-09-09 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJilla
Hmmm! What banners aren't showing up? I just checked the sites again.. everything is there?

http://www.sexdug.com/blow/alt/042905/main.htm

Second banner down on the right hand side isnt showing up for me.

DJilla 2005-09-09 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cleo
Pages are a mess in Safari and aren't too great in Firefox either.

Ya, no doubt about that. I use css but I'm just adding the the browser detect script to my main site pages now and just haven't got around to doing it on the free sites yet. But, without question the whole FF and Netscape user base has grown, is growing, too much not to have one. Safari, ehh I don't know of any scripts. If I'm adjusting for FF should be ok for Safari too right? I've never checked. Thanks.

DJ

DJilla 2005-09-09 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrMaryLou
Just at first glance they scroll at 800 wide and you are using video caps both are not allowed :( I think you should take a peek at the rules and see if your work fits :) http://www.link-o-rama.com/greenguy/therules.htm

It looks to me perfect at 800 but I use a tabbed browser overlay to IE, so maybe its diferent at 800 in IE too. I'll take a look at it in IE... oh yeah look at that a little scroll, what ya know.

Silly rabbit of course read the rules! Its just that a lot of times I've encountered the vid cap thing to be kind of flexible. Admittedly I've run into this before. In good conscience I cannot show surfers purchased content as a way to sell them on a site for a girl they'll never find. I know I would be furious and I'll just never do it. Unfortunately, the sponsors are not as forthcoming with pic content as maybe they should be. So I guess I won't be able to get many listings with you which is really sad. This is probably why I didn't get listed a long time ago.

BUT, you've got a great LL and a great board here that I'll visit often and thanks a lot for the heads up and 411.

Good Luck

DJ

DJilla 2005-09-09 11:25 PM

You were right!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by binxgook
http://www.sexdug.com/blow/alt/042905/main.htm

Second banner down on the right hand side isnt showing up for me.

Fixed! Was pulling it from my hard drive, how'd that happen |pokefun|

Its great to get that instant feedback and help from your mates. Thanks again.

2msacras 2005-09-10 12:25 AM

I'd also recomend having all your link recips above the enter link..that was the first thing I noticed on the site i check out

SortLinks 2005-09-10 04:51 AM

I can recall http://www.sexdug.com domain
you submitted to sortlinks.com long time ago..But I've rejected your sites..
I hope when you learn here you'll add sortlinks.com into your list to submit.

DJilla 2005-09-10 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SortLinks
I can recall http://www.sexdug.com domain
you submitted to sortlinks.com long time ago..But I've rejected your sites..

Right! At the time you didn't want an index.htm page and I had to move on. I've figured out reorganizing the entry pages and got you placed proper so I am actually resubmitting to you. That's why its been awhile. See you soon!

Thanks for the invite.

DJ

SortLinks 2005-09-10 08:35 AM

you're wellcome on all our LLs

DJilla 2005-09-11 08:03 AM

Reality Is Virtual
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SortLinks
you're wellcome on all our LLs

That’s very gracious thing to say and thank you. That’s nice. Our team wants to say that we are committed to our projects on the net in "we never close fashion" |clown|. We’ve tried hard to study how things are done and will always accept and follow positive standards, rules, link agreements, surfer safe practices, and proper customer service resolution. We are technically adept and remain fascinated with the quickly changing nature of this business and delivery technologies and models that are emerging ( see: http://www.current.tv and tell me that isn’t the coolest flash presentation you’ve ever seen? ) and want to be part of these new models of the future. We are always agreeable and look forward to getting to know more of you better and being productive (maybe even profitable) together.

Thanks again.

DJilla

Useless 2005-09-11 11:13 AM

Safari is an apple browser, not a 'webmaster' browser. I review in Firefox and decline sites that look that sloppy. Your sites look ok in IE because IE is a piece of shit that doesn't care about many errors. Build for Firefox and you're almost guaranteed to look good in IE.

If you can't judge what your sites will look like in 800x600 resolution, then test them in that resolution before submitting them. I get sites from experienced builder/submitters who still have the occasional horizontal scroll and it never ceases to amaze me. Test for size and click every single thumb before submitting.

You can't have Java or JavaScript on free sites. So, no browser detection scripts and no auto-date scripts (which is currently on those galleries). I'm seeing some odd full size pic dimensions. I hope you aren't cropping out sponsor watermarks.

Halfdeck 2005-09-11 06:08 PM

I see alot of spot on advice posted here. Here's what I noticed, btw I'm on Netscape browser..:D

One of your gallery pages have 5 links (one to a links page, 4 sponsor links). That's 2 too many for alot of LLs.

Also, I see pages where the source is one line long, so I'm guessing it's script generated. If I was a reviewer, I'd like to be able to read the source code.

Are you using scripts to generate as many free sites as possible using a template, rotating colors and other variables?

Your banner on sexdugs/blow/ gallery is blind. It needs to say more than sample1 $4.87 three days.

You still have javascript on some pages. No one will accept your site until you get rid of it.

If you want to insert dates into your pages, use PHP.

or whatever will get the job done...although I don't really see the point of dating your free sites.

The Asian site looks the best overall, but as MML said those are vid caps. If that's all you find in a sponsor's free content area, shoot an email to your sponsor and ask for a few pics, promote someone else, or just buy your own content.

morruga 2005-09-11 08:03 PM

apple is for webmasters and designers :D

DJilla 2005-09-12 08:23 AM

Bit By Bit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by morruga
apple is for webmasters and designers :D

Hmmm.... Apple, Apple, Apple didn't they used to sell computers? (Juuuusssst kiiiidddddiiing |bananna| )

"Build for Firefox and you're almost guaranteed to look good in IE."

You know, we use CSS like everywhere we can ( think accessability ) and are constantly trying to improve on it. Actually, unfortunatey, there are often BIG differences btw FF and IE under CSS in some areas like fonts and placement, etc. making browser detect needed.

"You can't have Java or JavaScript on free sites."

But, good point! Didn't think about that. Mostly I've seen rules that forbid java from opening new windows or pop ups or things like that. You think that a browser detct wouldn't pass muster? It's server side and wouldn't be a factor even if the surfer has got java turned off? Jeesh, don't know what to do about that :( .

"One of your gallery pages have 5 links "

Thanks! Working on that one right now!

"Also, I see pages where the source is one line long"

No script, just whitespace compression.

"sexdugs/blow/ gallery is blind. It needs to say more than sample1 $4.87 three days."

That's the same sponsor as the banner and pics on that page but it should clearer in text.

"If you want to insert dates into your pages, use PHP."

or whatever will get the job done

We date the pages merely for copyright notice reasons. Perhaps we could loose it but its a good habit to get into with all pages now a days. Particularly with companies like google moving in test waters ( see: http://www.itworld.com/Tech/2987/nls...egoogle050301/ )

On that PHP code |headbang| . I'm trying that now.

"apple is for webmasters and designers "

True dat! Muscians too! All kudos to Apple. I'm going to miss them! |pink

"Are you using scripts to generate as many free sites as possible using a template, rotating colors and other variables?"

Well, yes and no. We're going to make the three quoted sites razor sharp and then yes follwing that, basic duplication and rearrangment. Not by a script though through the use of CSS and by hand. CSS makes it fairly easy once its all right.

Thanks For All The points. Every one that's been pointed out has been or is being incoporated.

DJ

Useless 2005-09-12 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJilla
Actually, unfortunatey, there are often BIG differences btw FF and IE under CSS in some areas like fonts and placement, etc. making browser detect needed.

"You can't have Java or JavaScript on free sites."

But, good point! Didn't think about that. Mostly I've seen rules that forbid java from opening new windows or pop ups or things like that. You think that a browser detct wouldn't pass muster? It's server side and wouldn't be a factor even if the surfer has got java turned off? Jeesh, don't know what to do about that :( .

Listen, free sites are very simple things. You are complicating the process. Listen to us! You don't need a bunch of extra shit. You don't need to make altered copies for three different browsers. You don't need the date. All you need is 4 SIMPLE HTML pages. Index, main, gallery one, gallery two. Most of use CSS without a problem. Sure, there is an occasional element that IE fucks up, but that's Micro$oft for ya. Surf a few link lists and take a look at a bunch of listed free sites. You'll see what we're talking about. Don't reinvent the wheel. A new wheel always gets blacklisted.

And don't go thinking that we haven't heard all of this same shit before. We're still here and the people who have fought the system aren't.

Cleo 2005-09-12 08:45 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Yeah four pages of nice simple html is all that you need.

DJilla 2005-09-13 07:01 AM

K.I.S.S.
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Useless Warrior
Listen to us! You don't need a bunch of extra shit.
And don't go thinking that we haven't heard all of this same shit before. We're still here and the people who have fought the system aren't.

Heh, heh, heh, |blowkiss|
Ok, ok... I hear you, point taken,

Thanx,


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc