Would you decline for this?
 

I've been seeing some semi-deceptive linking techniques lately, and while technically no lies are being told I find them questionable.

1. "More Freesites Here" This one does indeed lead to more free listings, but only after a FPA where you have to scroll to the bottom of the page to find the "No thanks, take me to the free stuff" link.

2. "More Lesbian Links" Takes you to a page with lots of links, but they're all to paysites.

My gut reaction is to decline, firstly beacuse I, in surfer mode, expected freebies when I clicked, and secondly because I think the intention was to deceive. What do you guys think?

On #1, if I have to search hard to find the free sites, I tend to decline.
On #2, if it doesn't take me directly to a list with free lesbian links, I tend to decline.

For #1, I have to say as a surfer, that pisses me off
For #2, I see that as misleading for a surfer thinking more free sites

Usually when I review sites I usually have a pretty good idea on what the webmaster is trying to do and if I know deep down they are trying to instantly redirect a surfer to a pay site or anything else off domain, I won't accept them.

hmmmm...... for me, being both a free site builder and a ll owner I always put a text link on gallery pages like #2 that goes to a matching niche page on one of my link lists. When the surfer clicks it, the page has sponsor sites listed first with the free sites listed under those. I don't think there's anything deceptive about that. You've said "more lesbian links" and that's what the surfer gets. Because I do this, I don't have any problem with other link list owners doing the same on the free sites they submit to me.

Depends on the site. If it is full of "close calls" then yes. If there are popups on that page then yes. If it is clean and the site is clean otherwise then usually it is ok with me.

I don't have a problem with what you describe herel, in fact I do it myself. I checked out you Amateur cat at Click4SexFun and you have 27 clearly marked paysites at the top followed by over 200 free listings. No problem at all.

My beef is with the kind of page that has a lot of huge paysite links (that aren't even identified as such) followed by a tiny "continue-to-freesites" type link.

What Ramster says makes sense; the cumulative impression of the entire site. If I feel they're trying to bullshit the surfer it's thumbs down.

I agree with NetGoonie on both counts.

I can't think why any LL would jepordize their reputation with surfers by listing freesites with 'questionable' intentions. Why take the risk? Even if it's remote? It's the 'guilt by association' thing.

As a new submiter I've encountered many LLs using semi-deceptive links for their own benefit. Regardless of their reputation and traffic potential they will never be in my recip tables. Once again, it's the 'guilt by association' thing.

later ....................

Fucck me yeah, imagine a webmaster trying to make money, that would be a bastard wouldn't it |crazy|