Questionable sponsor - is this CP?
 

I've been browsing the net and found a site of a 12 years old girl posing clothed. On the bottom of the page there was a sponsor link. The sponsor offers 4 paysites with 12 years old girls posing clother. I checked their "rules" and the first one says that the usage of any kind of cp, nude child pics or whatever is prohibited as a promo practice.

Now how fucked up is that, cause all these girls are posing as other models, in sexy poses, you can see panties and whatnot. To me the content is pretty disturbing and I'd like if you can give me your opinion.

Fuck, I just checked the Google backlinks to the original site I found and found something even worse:

top dot flowermodels dot com

That's the domain of the sponsor:

cash dot teensagency dot com

This is fucking disturbing guys...

I didn't go look, but just based on your description I wouldn't want to touch it even with someone elses ten foot pole.

Whois info shows ownership located in Belize, and web hosting in the Netherlands.

nasty... like you said, "wouldn't touch it with someone else's ten foot pole."

How can people get away with this sort of crap? What is scary is that if they are shooting 12 y/o upskirts... what else are they doing? Horrible.

In spite of being sickening, it is not illegal.

The nice FBI people even said so on Oprah...

As long as the clothing stays on - there is no crime... even though we know what the sites are for, the customers knowing what the sites are for, and the owners knowing what the sites are for.

The girls they had on Oprah believed they what they were doing was the path to catwalk / magazine modelling fame and fortune. The parents they interviewed knew full well their membership base was primarily middle aged men - and couldn't give a flying fuck...

That pretty much sums it up.

This is really sick. I have 11 years old daughter, so my feelings about this issue are clear.

Too bad that cracking sites is illegal.

I would hang by the balls the person who would harm my kids. In fact they would have to restrain me as i would have no limit

It's a shame that there's a market for sites like this but even more disturbing is the parents of these girls. What kind of trailer trash parents would allow their children to do this?

I saw one of the Oprah episodes and the parents were defending the site, which is quite sick imo, but we all can bend our morals to suit our needs so why can't they!

Immoral...but not illegal.

I am trailer trash. I am a parent. That sort of crap pisses me off. It's all for the almighty dollar.

This thread kinda reminds me about those professional child models where they have beauty pagents and everything... they tell these 6 - 8 year old kids to wear thongs.

In my opinion, a thong is supposed to make a woman look sexy as she is showing off her ass. What the HELL is sexy about a kid?

Just fuckin sad and disturbing...not only that there's a demand for this crap, but that there are parents willing to put their kids out there to meet that demand |angry|

A couple of years ago I saw a site like this and it was based on the Gold Coast in Australia. Can't remember the name but it was set up like a college. I looked into it a bit and it was legal but man it made me feel sick. My girl is 13 and if anyone so much as suggested this sort of stuff to her or me they would want to know how to run fast.

You know, the way we all feel about this is pretty much the way anti-porn people feel about us :D

why don't we sick the "protect the children" anti-porners onto these people? oh wait I almost forgot that they don't really care about the kids, they just don't like porn |banghead|

the thing is the parents of these girls are the anti-porn GB republicans, and from southern red states. I saw that Opera show awhile back too.

There is always someone who loves or hates anything for that matter.

I think that we are on the "dark side" and perceived as perverts and whatever by general population. We do not implement moral standards by selling porn. I can talk about hypocrisy as long as you'd like, starting with a question "why is then so much money in adult industry"?

There is a line which says "do not cross" and those people involved into mentioned sites crossed it.

I feel where you're coming from, it's sad that the Christian Coalition and whatever other group is attacking mainstream pornography at the moment doesn't take some time ot focus their attack on something that 95% of people would find objectionable instead of their current 25% objectionable material.

Ugh !

Probably not illegal, but for god sake you might aswell put a metal ladder in the middle of your pool during a thunder storm.

Problem is crap like that will be used to justify the attack on our industry :(

Man thats nasty! yea and LB you're 100% right with your statement!

Not illegal if you ask me but it's a sick world out there...

Its only down hill from there for those girls, the parents should be locked up.