Using Sponsor Content that was not used before
 

I know sponsor content got itself a bad rep, but that's just because of overexposure and abnoxious watermarks, right? If I get exclusive sets from a sponsor and they have none or very small watermarks, then I'm safe, right? Is that the case even if the site itself has been overexposed?

Say, for example that I get exclusive sets from Nasty Dollars to promote MILF Hunter with - could I still get the site disqualified on the grounds of using sponsor content, even if I'm the only affiliate who can use those sets? (Using ND as an example, I have arrangements with other sponsors, but not with them as it happens ;)). I just assume that MILF Hunter sets are used often, hence this example.

To sum it up, if that particular set has not been submitted to LL's before, but others by the same site/sponsor have been, is that still overexposed content?

We mostly base it on how many times we've each seen it, so it's a crap shoot as far as who's reviewing & what they've seen before.

(btw - no sponsor content is officially banned & I doubt any ever will)

Same here |thumb

First cum first served :D

Yup, same answer here |thumb

Yeah, I guess my concern is this, I want to make an anjali or dogging site, so would have to use sponsor content (no point promoting these with anything else). I will try and go for one of their fresh sets (they just added some new ones), but I am thinking, what if the reviewer just takes a look at anjali's face and gets that de-ja-vous feeling from seeing her in other sets?