![]() |
Three Gallery Free Sites
Do any LLs not accept these?
I can see where they would be more of a challenge with content but you would also have more advertising real estate. What are some opinions on the advantages/disadvantages? |
I accept them, as long as their's still 12 pics per gallery (otherwise, people would submit 3 gallery sites with 8 pics per page or 4 gallery sites with 6 pics per page)
It is a lot of content, but you are right that it does give you another page of ads, so it's really up to you. |
No problemos here with 3 gallery sites :)
|
Fine with me
|
I list them too, thought I'd be curios how's traffic that comes off that type of free sites converting, because IMHO 3 galleries means to much content given away for free.
|
I have no problems with 3 gallery sites as well :)
|
Sometime in 2007, the 3-gallery free site will become the minimum accepted at one or more link lists.
|couch| |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As long as it's an option, either 2 galleries of 12 minimum, or 3 galleries of 8 minimum, you got my vote. |thumb |
Quote:
|
Great feedback from all on this one! I was looking at it primarily from the perspective of time management... I would think that it would be positive for SEO as well. The 3 X 8 rule would take care of that "too much" issue. Maybe I am backwards but when I surf for Free Sites I typically hit the last gallery first and only go to a previous gallery if the last was really good...I'm not a very good prospect for porn though ;-)
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
I've think I've seen 'em all MrYum ;-)
|
I have no problem with 3 galleries but I'm sick of these all gay 5-gallery (24pics each) freesites.
I've banned dozens of domains but there are more comming my way every fucking day |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc