Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   GG I havn't been getting listed ? ... (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=3873)

dubb 2004-01-15 03:16 AM

GG I havn't been getting listed ? ...
 
As of late I have not been getting list for some reason and I was wondering if you could tell me why. I have submitted 2 in in the past month 1 as far back as Dec 23. which was http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/ and I don't recall getting listed for that one or a more recent one http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/voyeur/ that was submitted on Jan 3. Then there was one more that was submitted but that was more recent like about a week now so I took that as you just not getting around to it yet since your probably packed as it is. If you could get back to be I would apresiate it . Thanks

swedguy 2004-01-15 05:12 AM

I don't know why he didn't list you. But here's couple of things I saw that would probably not get you listed....

http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...&threadid=3664

Free Tips #1: The index page lacks a complete body tag

You also have a Porn Inspector recip: http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/...threadid=3348&

Greenguy 2004-01-15 08:43 AM

I could have been the Porn Inspector links (which the issue with them has been resolved)

On the voyeur site, I would have kicked it back because that 1st gallery is cleary not voyeur (unless the girl is blind)

On the anal site, the ad on this gallery - http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/gal9.html - is a FPA in my book :(

dubb 2004-01-15 12:02 PM

Quote:

On the voyeur site, I would have kicked it back because that 1st gallery is clearly not voyeur (unless the girl is blind)
For the voyeur site I thought that upskirt and voyeur are in the same category because if you look at the the sponsors site they have both upskirt and voyeur on it which is where I got both contents from. If you don't go by that then my fault didn't know.


Quote:

On the anal site, the ad on this gallery - http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/gal9.html - is a FPA in my book
I don't see how that is a full page ad because if you look and click the images each is a thumbnail which goes to a full jpg picture.They are just cut into different styles for the effect of the gallery style. The only thing that is linked to the sponsor is the text under it.


Quote:

I could have been the Porn Inspector links (which the issue with them has been resolved)
Hmm k I read something about that but i'm still not sure about it. So is a Porn Inspector link acceptable or not just for the record so I don't make that mistake again?

Thanks for your quick response and I will try to fix the problems you said in my up coming sites.

dubb 2004-01-15 12:08 PM

Thanks swedguy for the link to that post it was very helpful.

Greenguy 2004-01-15 12:15 PM

http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/voyeur/gal8.html - pics of a girl in the bath tub while the camera is moving around the room is NOT voyeur in my book. This is a voyeur page: http://www.chestyamateurs.com/spying/3101900831.html :)

http://www.xxxpornpicsfree.com/anal/gal9.html - my bad on that one - it looked like those images up top were ads - sorry :(

& you can link to Porn Inspector if you want, but doing so does you no good what-so-ever. If you want to give traffic away for free, be my guest :)

dubb 2004-01-15 12:28 PM

Well I can understand that but I can only work with the content they gave me. So I will be more critical in how I pick my pictures from now on. Thanks again for your help.

DangerDave 2004-01-15 05:16 PM

dubb,

Your site is free-hosted ? yes?

DD

dubb 2004-01-16 12:06 AM

No DD my site is not free hosted. My friend is starting his reseller hosting program from www interquad dot net and I am signed up to him.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc