Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   I got declined... (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=4200)

sickkittens 2004-01-25 02:37 PM

I got declined...
 
and the reason was "i do not accept tgp like galleries"

What's the difference between a TGP gallery and a free site gallery?

They pretty much look the same to me on alot of sites. |sad|

Cleo 2004-01-25 02:43 PM

"a TGP gallery"
This is one page of clickable thumbs.

"free site gallery"
This is a warning page that leads to a main page that leads to two galleries of clickable thumbs so four pages in total.

stuveltje 2004-01-25 02:43 PM

......some linksites accept free sites and no tgp gallery, free site = warning, main, gallery1 and gallery2.
tgp=one gallery

if they dont accept tgp galleries it means they dont accept a gallerie submit, big difference between a tgp gallerie or a free site, check the rules of a linksite it will tell you what they do accept

sickkittens 2004-01-25 02:48 PM

No, what I mean is I submitted the free site...warning, main, 2 galleries, etc. but they won't accept it because of the way the gallery pages look.

Strange.

Cleo 2004-01-25 02:51 PM

Post the URL of the site.

grzepa 2004-01-25 02:53 PM

Hm I think I know what you mean... probably you made a site with warning with main page and 2 galleries... but these galleries were taken straight from the free hosted sponsor galleries ... unchanged, with lots of graphics that ppl rarely use bulding gallerys from scratch.


I maybe wrong.

sickkittens 2004-01-25 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cleo
Post the URL of the site.
http://www.sickkittens.com/fs/teensforcash/amateurs/

grzepa 2004-01-25 03:05 PM

Well that isnt what i thought it would be... no idea why you got declined...

grzepa 2004-01-25 03:13 PM

Well that isnt what i thought it would be... no idea why you got declined...

security_man 2004-01-25 04:14 PM

that content is pretty well used, maybe thats what got the rejection and they selected the wrong choice in the reason for rejection dropdown.

not sure tho

Surfn 2004-01-25 04:25 PM

It may be because you surrounded the banner with thumbs...

sickkittens 2004-01-25 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Surfn
It may be because you surrounded the banner with thumbs...
I didn't knwo that was a no-no :(

sickkittens 2004-01-25 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by security_man
that content is pretty well used, maybe thats what got the rejection and they selected the wrong choice in the reason for rejection dropdown.

not sure tho

Actually, I emailed them to ask for an explanation so it wasn;t an accidental drop down choice on their part.

dallasdeb 2004-01-25 06:48 PM

sickkittens, I personally rejected that site (you submitted a mirror to Adult Porn Guide) for the big blind link on the front page 'Teens Having Fun and Wild Sex' which goes straight to the sponsor.

I would suggest that may have been the main reason but other possible reasons you were rejected include
1. Overused sponsor content
2. Oversized main pics (yes they can be too big)
3. The index/front page and the rest of the site being in different directories
4. The title on the front page is not the same as the title inside the site (because of the different directories I imagine)
5. The title of the site is too similar to the sponsor
6. The link on the main page 'Visit TEENSFORCASH for more teens' is a bit dodgy, smells like a blind link
7. The links to 'free teens sites' and 'OTHER FREE TEENS SITES' go to a FPA that has no free teens sites on it, but has a link 'go 2 TEENSFORCASH for crazy sex' which is a link straight to the sponsor
8. All of the above

sickkittens 2004-02-04 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dallasdeb
sickkittens, I personally rejected that site (you submitted a mirror to Adult Porn Guide) for the big blind link on the front page 'Teens Having Fun and Wild Sex' which goes straight to the sponsor.

I would suggest that may have been the main reason but other possible reasons you were rejected include
1. Overused sponsor content
2. Oversized main pics (yes they can be too big)
3. The index/front page and the rest of the site being in different directories
4. The title on the front page is not the same as the title inside the site (because of the different directories I imagine)
5. The title of the site is too similar to the sponsor
6. The link on the main page 'Visit TEENSFORCASH for more teens' is a bit dodgy, smells like a blind link
7. The links to 'free teens sites' and 'OTHER FREE TEENS SITES' go to a FPA that has no free teens sites on it, but has a link 'go 2 TEENSFORCASH for crazy sex' which is a link straight to the sponsor
8. All of the above

I always thought it was ok to have different Titles for each page?

dallasdeb 2004-02-04 07:58 PM

Quote:

I always thought it was ok to have different Titles for each page?
I am sure it is probably fine to do that, the fact that you had the warning page and the main page in different directories is what made it look suspicious. If you are going to do doorways my advice would be to at least have all pages in the same directory.

Kezza 2004-02-05 08:51 AM

SickKittens... there are a heap of link lists out there that may not be so pedantic... check them out and modify your recip tables accordingly

We all have different ideas about what is acceptable, you just need to find your style and find link lists that accommodate your style.

Good luck with you sites in the future :)

neo-gel 2004-02-05 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Surfn
It may be because you surrounded the banner with thumbs...
Why is this a problem?

Surfn 2004-02-05 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by neo-gel
Why is this a problem?
Because many tap's and LL owners don't like that. Some of them actually explain it in their rules. A few even give examples.

neo-gel 2004-02-05 10:24 AM

Oh I know it's in the rules of many sites.

I'm just trying to understand the logic behind that rule.

I can see it being a problem if the banner can be mistaken for a thumbs but other than that I'm at a loss to understand it.

Surfn 2004-02-05 11:07 AM

Their thinking ( and I agree) is for one thing it disturbs the flow of the gallery, but most importantly it creates a sort of blind link because surfers think it's part of the picture set. I know we all know different. But surfers are not webmasters.

Cleo 2004-02-05 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by neo-gel
Why is this a problem?
I decline for this.

It is bad design. It looks like you turned the thumbs into a frame for the ad.

The site IS about the content, NOT the ads. Your galleries are our content. It is content that makes the surfer come to our sites, not to look at your ads.

This isn't to say that we aren't doing this to make sales. Sales should be the only reason we do this, but it needs to be done right or there will not be any sales.

Entice the surfer, amuse the surfer, get the surfer excited and then sell them the sponsor.

Tricking the surfer or slamming them with ads is not going to result in sales.

Go out and buy some magazines and see how they design pages. Most magazines make most of their money from the ads, not from sales of the magazine so the magazine is about the selling ad space, but the person who bought it bought it for its content.

DangerDave 2004-02-05 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cleo
The site IS about the content, NOT the ads. Your galleries are our content. It is content that makes the surfer come to our sites, not to look at your ads.
Amen Sister |buddy|

backoffbitch 2004-02-05 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by dallasdeb
sickkittens, I personally rejected that site (you submitted a mirror to Adult Porn Guide) for the big blind link on the front page 'Teens Having Fun and Wild Sex' which goes straight to the sponsor.


That's hardly a blind link. There is no deception. No trickery, no lies. There ARE teens having wild sex in the site it links to.. so tell me something... What's wrong with this other than he may actualy get a sale from the warning page withought having to actualy see content?

My god, I run a link list myself and would never decline someone for that reason. However, the rest of your reasons have very good merit.

I just think alot of link lists owners have to stop telling webmasters what words to use in advertising. At this rate the only acceptable text link will be "Click here and you might be able to find a resemblance to this girl but you will have to have a credit card and it will cost you exactly $xx.xx to join and ignore everythign else I say on this site cause I am full fo myself and am taking advantage of link lists owners by wanting to actualy make money"


end rant.

DangerDave 2004-02-05 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by backoffbitch
That's hardly a blind link. There is no deception. No trickery, no lies.
It is 100% a deceptive link! especially when the surfer has come from a Link List that has listed the site as free, and the surfer hits that link, which looks like an entrance to the site.. and find themsleves at a pay site.

Not only will you not make a sale... you will reflect badly on the linklist that listed the site.

Quote:

Originally posted by backoffbitch
I just think alot of link lists owners have to stop telling webmasters what words to use in advertising.
No one is telling anyone what text to use..! LL owners are simply saying that if you want my traffic, then you have to follow my rules and submit sites of a certain quality.

You can blind link your ass off and pop consoles and auto install anything you like on your sites.. you just can't submit them to lists that have quality standards.



DD


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc