Is this a bad gallery?
 

In the course of my day to day, I happened to be redirected to this gallery, by a webmaster who I am building some pages for.

This is the address: http://www.nenablue.com/webmasters/c..._63/index.html

I have never seen anything like this, and to say that I was shocked, was a little of an understatement. I am not religious, but this could, to me, be overstepping the boundaries of what erotica is and isn't.

I think it would make for an interesting talking point, to say the least.

Have a look and please say what you guys think to it, and whether it is morally correct, or incorrect to depict a religious icon in this manner.

I wouldn't do it but people do it on occasion.

While I believe in freedom of religion and freedom from religion, I tend to stay away from things that may inflame or defame one’s religion. I would pass on it myself.

**This is of course just my stupid opinion**

You do realize that you're a pornographer, right? :D

It's all a matter of personal preference.

Christians aren't supposed to idolize icons anyway. They shouldn't care, but they would (and yes, I understand why). We heathens would think that such sacrilege is sort of kinky though. Who doesn't wish they could screw in a church? Being that you aren't marketing to hardcore Christians, I wouldn't be overly concerned.

I'd rather look at that than an episode of MeatHoles.

I think the chick should be allowed to worship the Lord in any way she sees fit without us passing judgement.

Damn, sombody get her a tampon!

It's awesome... I love the site.

We all have our "crosses" to bare i suppose.

Kinda of reminds me of the Exorist!

I'm not Christian but I'm offended on their behalf.

|buddy| says |thumb |thumb

As a man of the cloth I am thoroughly disappointed with this gallery.

Those links are blind and there is NO reason for that header to be a swf!

I've known religious bigots who would get off on that shit. A finger to the sky shouting hell and damnation, with his dick crying out for discreet masturbation. That's what hypocracy is all about, isn't it?

Good or bad? I'm agnostic on that one.

I just hope that cross isn't made of wood. The splinters could be a bitch

As a freelance web designer, I would think that the terminology in my case would be more of a whore... I work for whoever pays!

Hi guys!
29/01/08 11:44

I would like to say that we are aware that this gallery could be seen as an offence for people who are religious, but we are talk about art... Nude art. The only goal is to take an icon (in this case Jesus) and explore a new context in the adult world. I think we must read deeper inside the concept; more than just the pictures. |headbang|

If you want to contact nenablue: nacho@nenablue.com

Can yer do a girl holding a teddy bear that's wearing a t-shirt with Mohamed on it?

Really good idea Man!!

Let me check it..... |bananna| |bananna|

I thought Jesus was a guy.

Yup, me too...

pretty interesting..Im not so disturbed by the fact that shes portraying Christ...its the scene itself..its disturbing in Passion of the Christ, and just as disturbing with a hot naked chic depicting it...But by all mean express whatever you wish artistically...

Hence, "explore a new context". Making him into a hot naked chick would be a pretty new context.

If I had Photoshop skills, I'd take one of these pics, put it in frame, and place it on the wall behind Foxy Angel in that scene where she's getting her cock sucked while dressed like a nun. Push the boundaries...

Also, I'd stay away from anything Mohammed-related. There's a big difference from possibly angering religious folk who may picket outside your office and pissing off people willing to kill you for mis-naming a stuffed animal.

Don't be such a pussy, they'd kill you just for being an American, whether you piss them off by insulting their religion or not.