Gg & Dd ---->
 

Hello I recently submitted : http://www.pornlucky.com/amateur-teen-isabella/ and its not listed on link-o-rama and DDaves

+ i submitted today http://www.pornlucky.com/amateur-teen-ariel/

was that something wrong with these sites ? please let me know.

cheers
grzepa

Todays one - declined

http://www.pornlucky.com/amateur-teen-ariel/ - pics too big.. 1000+ long side, >90K

You are also using progressive jpegs, which as a rule are larger in file size than jpegs encoded the standard way.


http://www.pornlucky.com/amateur-teen-isabella/ - declined

http://www.pornlucky.com/amateur-tee...ella/main.html - this page is "ad-dominant" eg: 99% ad, 1 % galleries. A smaller ad and some text "selling" the content proably would have made it ok.


On both sites... that content is quickly becoming overused.

DD

First site gallery http://www.pornlucky.com/amateur-tee.../gallery1.html not enough nudity :( This one is rejected content files too big :( http://www.pornlucky.com/amateur-teen-ariel/

DangerDave,

You consider jpegs encoded in progressive larger than regular encoding? I've found that they are a bit smaller than standard encoding in my usage, but maybe that's just me...

Ok I see :(

Guess there is not much there can be done to the "isabella" but if I'll resize the pics on "ariel" and make them smaller in size and in KB - it will be ok ?

cheers
grzepa

Just try to keep the conent around 50k to 35k and 500 on the long side and you shouldnt have any problems :)