Greenguy's Board

Greenguy's Board (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/index.php)
-   Link Lists & Getting Listed (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   New submission form (http://www.greenguysboard.com/board/showthread.php?t=63634)

Holister 2012-03-13 03:41 PM

New submission form
 
Hey guys, I thought that I would try something different with my LL at virexy-porn.com.
I tried to explain the idea at http://www.virexy-porn.com/submitn.php.

Basically, you would submit a free site without link to my or any other LL. Instead you'd permanently put my link on one of your domain's index page.
I would then accept one submission per day as long as that one back-link is still on your site.

Please let me know what you think. Thanks.

Greenguy 2012-03-13 04:37 PM

Interesting idea |thumb

Jeremy82 2012-03-13 06:42 PM

More domains = more free sites? (I usually submit 3/day)

Holister 2012-03-14 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeremy82 (Post 514494)
More domains = more free sites? (I usually submit 3/day)

Yeah, that could work, thanks for the suggestion. I will modify the script to allow that...

LD 2012-03-14 07:22 AM

Nice. Maybe we can get away from recip tables completely.

LeRoy 2012-03-14 01:37 PM

Very interesting.

I like the traffic back from the recip tables.

Is this bad for SEO or something?

pc 2012-03-14 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeRoy (Post 514512)
Very interesting.

I like the traffic back from the recip tables.

Is this bad for SEO or something?

for SEO should be better, for traffic back from tables not better

edit:

For his linklist SEO should be better, for fs without recip tables should be better too, forget about traffic back from recip tables. But this should work, recip links from index pages holds much more value than reciprocals on domain.com/folder/subfolder/fs.html and fs without so many reciprocals should have much better chance for higher SEO. Once linklist receives many extra backlinks from domain index/main pages, linklist should have more organic traffic from google ( mainly because lists our fs's not very heavy on external links ) therefore listed fs should receive more traffic from linklist.

|loony|

JustRobert 2012-03-14 09:08 PM

I believe this was tried by someone around here before with not much luck.

Not that this is a bad thing to try, maybe with the right list it could work.

Holister 2012-03-15 01:15 AM

Thanks for explaining it. That's what I thought, better SEO for both me and submitters, resulting in more traffic for all of us. And, less work for submitter. I realize I would lose traffic from recip tables, but I don't see any downside for submitter.

But, nobody seems to be interested, nobody registered yet. Well, I tried |huh


Quote:

Originally Posted by pc (Post 514517)
for SEO should be better, for traffic back from tables not better

edit:

For his linklist SEO should be better, for fs without recip tables should be better too, forget about traffic back from recip tables. But this should work, recip links from index pages holds much more value than reciprocals on domain.com/folder/subfolder/fs.html and fs without so many reciprocals should have much better chance for higher SEO. Once linklist receives many extra backlinks from domain index/main pages, linklist should have more organic traffic from google ( mainly because lists our fs's not very heavy on external links ) therefore listed fs should receive more traffic from linklist.

|loony|


Simon 2012-03-15 06:33 AM

While I don't submit traditional free sites any longer, I do think that doing it the way Holister is offering provides benefits for both LL owner and submitter.

Robert is right that this has been tried without much success before though. It's always hard to change the established and accepted way of doing things.

Part of the problem is that the benefit immediately flows to the LL owner, since the recip link from the submitter's index page would be there right from the start. But the submitter will usually still be submitting an old-style free site with a table full of reciprocal links that's just missing that one LL's recip link.

It could be good for the submitters who already build a "clean" (no recips) version of each free site since they could submit a link to that version. But submitters who don't already do that would have to make a clean copy to get the full benefits and not everyone wants to add more work to their schedule for something they don't know will benefit them.

I think this is something that would need to be agreed on by at least a majority of the largest LLs who currently send the most traffic to free sites before you can expect much change from submitters.

Like no one says...adapt or don't.

:)

Holister 2012-03-15 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon (Post 514532)
Robert is right that this has been tried without much success before though. It's always hard to change the established and accepted way of doing things.

I didn't know that anybody tried it, otherwise I'd probably didn't offer it...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon (Post 514532)
Part of the problem is that the benefit immediately flows to the LL owner, since the recip link from the submitter's index page would be there right from the start.

That's good point. Then maybe it would be fair to offer submitters kind of 'signup bonus'. Like 3 free sites listed immediately after registration's approval?

Jeremy82 2012-03-16 08:09 AM

I generally like this idea, but I'd like to keep the number of outgoing links on the index page on some reasonable level - it means +/- 20 for me. So in this case the TOP link lists may get some "fresh wind" but other ones may die immediately.

I also think that the links from those index pages, that are on google's botom, have quite negligible impact (and this applies to most of the free site domains I think).

mOrrI 2012-03-16 06:49 PM

hum... interesting indeed...

JustRobert 2012-03-17 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Holister (Post 514535)
I didn't know that anybody tried it, otherwise I'd probably didn't offer it...

It was smaller list I believe that had no real love by the big G engine. Thats why I stated with the right list this could work.

Fonz 2012-03-17 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustRobert (Post 514524)
I believe this was tried by someone around here before with not much luck.

Mateusz with mydailyfreeporn.com

He sold all his sites :(

Holister 2012-03-18 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fonz (Post 514608)
Mateusz with mydailyfreeporn.com

He sold all his sites :(

Okay, so it has been tried before. But I still don't understand why people don't want to try it. I thought current LL concept was on such a decline that it would seem to be reasonable to change things a bit. And submitter won't even have to do any additional work when he's submitting regular recip free sites (at least I always used to create clean site before the recip ones).

Fonz 2012-03-18 04:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Holister (Post 514611)
Okay, so it has been tried before. But I still don't understand why people don't want to try it. I thought current LL concept was on such a decline that it would seem to be reasonable to change things a bit. And submitter won't even have to do any additional work when he's submitting regular recip free sites (at least I always used to create clean site before the recip ones).

I'm not saying that it's a bad idea, I'm actually all for this idea. The reason he sold his sites wasn't the single link on his root page for sure :)

Greenguy 2012-03-18 05:02 PM

I was thinking about this & I know it's work with Link Admin as far as linking back from the root.

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

RedCherry 2012-03-19 11:31 AM

It seems to me if a network of sites got together and adopted this it would work. I for one tend to submit on domains I have a hub, link list or blog on my index and setting up all the links one time on that index would be easy.

But like everyone else said, we'd all have to all agree to do it.

Personally, I'd be open to do it on all my link lists if everyone else in the group wanted to set it up. |thumb

It seems to me it would help out the link lists, and since you weren't doing a ton of identical link backs on a domain to the LL, might make it look less "spammy" to G. Not sure how it would effect back links though.

pc 2012-03-19 02:01 PM

Helping Holister to push things in this direction a little and maybe set new trend I also added this feature to my LL.
I had recip hardcoded on my submission page so it was exactly the same as submission url. But now when you go to submission page and clicking ?lazy button, you have two simple buttons/options to choose from, "s" recip on submission page or "d" recip on root index of that domain.
I don't know if that makes sense but when you go to that page you will know what to do. Very easy.

JAI-LING 2012-03-23 05:59 AM

I am doing this with a high traffic asian tgp we submit to. We put their link on our blog page and submit galleries...If anyone will accept galleries, unique content, please let me know. I like Holister's idea. It seemed to improve the quality of our traffic from the effort.

Again, if you have a LL we can submit galleries to, please let me know.

if anyone wants a permanent link on a blog in exchange for gallery submission please let me know. Thanks
sorry for repeat, its 3am. :)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© Greenguy Marketing Inc