same site.declined again
 

One last,then I just move on.

http://xxx-mans.com/anal/1/

thanks again
|violin|

let's see...

over compressed pictures like http://xxx-mans.com/anal/1/content/019.jpg which actually shows major pixilation from rounding errors on compression.

None of your CLICK HERE links on the thumb pages work,, you are missing the A HREF statements all over those links. So none of your promos work.

That's more than far enough to stop me...

Alex

I remember this one...

It was the 200K GIF that got me..:(

http://xxx-mans.com/anal/1/content/011.GIF

DD

Same for me files are toooooooooo big

okay how about now?


|goodnight

Alot of those pics still look like crap :(

& what's with the "ungegistered version" text on the top left corner of all of them?

Pics are copyright 1995

You sure these aren't "public domain" images?

the software I used to compress this time wrote that on it.


Which crappy pics in particular?

copyright 1995 equals public domain?

Might be time to buy some decent compression software :)

This pic is a good example of what I mean by crappy: http://xxx-mans.com/anal/1/content/022.jpg

I agree. poorly compressed |sad|

the originals weren't that great before compression:D
(Old zmaster content)

As far as I am aware "public domain" is a myth.. and I believe ZMaster would back me up on that for that content.

It was some of the first legit content sold.

Still got the CD's :D

DD

Try Easy Thumbnails. It works great and it's free.

You can get it here http://www.fookes.com/

yep,so do I.bought the lifetime package thing,back in 1996

okay lets try this again
 

http://xxx-mans.com/anal/1/


okay went through and compressed each by hand,let me know |zzzzzzzzz

Re: okay lets try this again
 

hmm no comments now?

http://xxx-mans.com/anal/1/content/022.jpg

Same thing still - still that "unregister version" thing on the top, and still horrible flaring / brightness stepping on the image itself. Rather than a smooth flesh tone, you have a target effect, rings of color tone.

It would appear that the number of colors in the picture is too low, and the compression WAY too high.

Unless forbidden by your license, I would trim them down to get rid of the borders and disclaimer text, which would drop the image size down a little bit. The original images are a bit over exposed to start with, and agressive compression just makes them flare and get ugly. Remember, these are 35MM photos scanned from the slides or whatever about 10 years ago. Technology has gone a long way since!

Alex

In all honesty - I'd just junk that content and get some new stuff - I really can't see many places listing it even if it were in the "perfect" free site...