this is what it translates to via google.
Quote:
|
The question is, at the very least, controversy. We know that simplest it is to condemn hacker sumariamente that it invades a site or computer. But until point it is the guilty unico? E the Webmasters? Which the parcel of guilt of them? Many defend, also, that quick hacker a service to the community when it invades a page and it shows how much the this is vulnerable and how much he is dangerous to deposit confidence in yielding confidential information to these sites. But it is not total for there. If we only used this theory, we could for anologia say that the outlaw whom he steals is giving to a service the society when showing that the security system as a whole is defective. Hacker: outlaw or young man?
|