btw, reason I am pretty upset is that in effect what kit is saying is:
"Alpha, your style is too agressive"...
...which means I will never get listed on PB/WP again.
PB has been swapping out with tommy as #1 LL traffic lately for me.
To have my #1 LL source reject what
I know will be several sales is bad enough.
But to have then basically tell me that my style is too agressive throws up a red flag that none of my sites will be accepted from now on.
I mean- that's my style. I'm 1:298 of LL traffic for the site I promote in that free site that was rejected. Hell, I thought it would even get a good tier number.
So, this rejection feels like a personal blow to my ad copy which is all we have.
I've also never been rejected before.
I mean- if it's accepted all other places and this style works for me...I'm not even sure how to change it.
Sure, it's said to just build and move on. But this rejection is a bad omen that for whatever reason there was a policy change/ reviewer change and they don't like what works for me.
Hell, I've nver gotten under a tier 7, and usually do better than that. Now, it's like- because your ad copy is agressive we won't list you.
It's not the content, or a rule breaker- it's a judement call on a subjective thing.
I'm I really seeing my #1 / #2 and # 7 Link List traffic go *poof* over a subjective item that is the heart of what we do?
If kit could be more specific I guess there is no choice but to comply. I was expecting at least several sales this weekend from that site.
Now I tend to think others I have in their que will be rejected for exact same reason.
I hope kit reads this soon. I am well aware it's his site, his rules, but I'm willing to modify my style to get listed. However, I need specifics in order to modify.
While I don't agree with this 'agressive=bad' thing at all I am all to aware I am but a grunt and need the traffic.
I wasn't aware a porn link list could ever be in favor of censorship...but it seems this is the case. That's truly sad.